engineering-team/skills/senior-frontend/SKILL.md
Frontend development skill for React, Next.js, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS applications. Use when building React components, optimizing Next.js performance, analyzing bundle sizes, scaffolding frontend projects, implementing accessibility, or reviewing frontend code quality.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills senior-frontendInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Frontend development patterns, performance optimization, and automation tools for React/Next.js applications.
Generate a new Next.js or React project with TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, and best practice configurations.
Run the scaffolder with your project name and template:
python scripts/frontend_scaffolder.py my-app --template nextjs
Add optional features (auth, api, forms, testing, storybook):
python scripts/frontend_scaffolder.py dashboard --template nextjs --features auth,api
Navigate to the project and install dependencies:
cd my-app && npm install
Start the development server:
npm run dev
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| --template nextjs | Next.js 14+ with App Router and Server Components |
| --template react | React + Vite with TypeScript |
| --features auth | Add NextAuth.js authentication |
| --features api | Add React Query + API client |
| --features forms | Add React Hook Form + Zod validation |
| --features testing | Add Vitest + Testing Library |
| --dry-run | Preview files without creating them |
my-app/
├── app/
│ ├── layout.tsx # Root layout with fonts
│ ├── page.tsx # Home page
│ ├── globals.css # Tailwind + CSS variables
│ └── api/health/route.ts
├── components/
│ ├── ui/ # Button, Input, Card
│ └── layout/ # Header, Footer, Sidebar
├── hooks/ # useDebounce, useLocalStorage
├── lib/ # utils (cn), constants
├── types/ # TypeScript interfaces
├── tailwind.config.ts
├── next.config.js
└── package.json
Generate React components with TypeScript, tests, and Storybook stories.
Generate a client component:
python scripts/component_generator.py Button --dir src/components/ui
Generate a server component:
python scripts/component_generator.py ProductCard --type server
Generate with test and story files:
python scripts/component_generator.py UserProfile --with-test --with-story
Generate a custom hook:
python scripts/component_generator.py FormValidation --type hook
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| --type client | Client component with 'use client' (default) |
| --type server | Async server component |
| --type hook | Custom React hook |
| --with-test | Include test file |
| --with-story | Include Storybook story |
| --flat | Create in output dir without subdirectory |
| --dry-run | Preview without creating files |
'use client';
import { useState } from 'react';
import { cn } from '@/lib/utils';
interface ButtonProps {
className?: string;
children?: React.ReactNode;
}
export function Button({ className, children }: ButtonProps) {
return (
<div className={cn('', className)}>
{children}
</div>
);
}
Analyze package.json and project structure for bundle optimization opportunities.
Run the analyzer on your project:
python scripts/bundle_analyzer.py /path/to/project
Review the health score and issues:
Bundle Health Score: 75/100 (C)
HEAVY DEPENDENCIES:
moment (290KB)
Alternative: date-fns (12KB) or dayjs (2KB)
lodash (71KB)
Alternative: lodash-es with tree-shaking
Apply the recommended fixes by replacing heavy dependencies.
Re-run with verbose mode to check import patterns:
python scripts/bundle_analyzer.py . --verbose
| Score | Grade | Action | |-------|-------|--------| | 90-100 | A | Bundle is well-optimized | | 80-89 | B | Minor optimizations available | | 70-79 | C | Replace heavy dependencies | | 60-69 | D | Multiple issues need attention | | 0-59 | F | Critical bundle size problems |
The analyzer identifies these common heavy packages:
| Package | Size | Alternative | |---------|------|-------------| | moment | 290KB | date-fns (12KB) or dayjs (2KB) | | lodash | 71KB | lodash-es with tree-shaking | | axios | 14KB | Native fetch or ky (3KB) | | jquery | 87KB | Native DOM APIs | | @mui/material | Large | shadcn/ui or Radix UI |
Reference: references/react_patterns.md
Share state between related components:
const Tabs = ({ children }) => {
const [active, setActive] = useState(0);
return (
<TabsContext.Provider value={{ active, setActive }}>
{children}
</TabsContext.Provider>
);
};
Tabs.List = TabList;
Tabs.Panel = TabPanel;
// Usage
<Tabs>
<Tabs.List>
<Tabs.Tab>One</Tabs.Tab>
<Tabs.Tab>Two</Tabs.Tab>
</Tabs.List>
<Tabs.Panel>Content 1</Tabs.Panel>
<Tabs.Panel>Content 2</Tabs.Panel>
</Tabs>
Extract reusable logic:
function useDebounce<T>(value: T, delay = 500): T {
const [debouncedValue, setDebouncedValue] = useState(value);
useEffect(() => {
const timer = setTimeout(() => setDebouncedValue(value), delay);
return () => clearTimeout(timer);
}, [value, delay]);
return debouncedValue;
}
// Usage
const debouncedSearch = useDebounce(searchTerm, 300);
Share rendering logic:
function DataFetcher({ url, render }) {
const [data, setData] = useState(null);
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);
useEffect(() => {
fetch(url).then(r => r.json()).then(setData).finally(() => setLoading(false));
}, [url]);
return render({ data, loading });
}
// Usage
<DataFetcher
url="/api/users"
render={({ data, loading }) =>
loading ? <Spinner /> : <UserList users={data} />
}
/>
Reference: references/nextjs_optimization_guide.md
Use Server Components by default. Add 'use client' only when you need:
// Server Component (default) - no 'use client'
async function ProductPage({ params }) {
const product = await getProduct(params.id); // Server-side fetch
return (
<div>
<h1>{product.name}</h1>
<AddToCartButton productId={product.id} /> {/* Client component */}
</div>
);
}
// Client Component
'use client';
function AddToCartButton({ productId }) {
const [adding, setAdding] = useState(false);
return <button onClick={() => addToCart(productId)}>Add</button>;
}
import Image from 'next/image';
// Above the fold - load immediately
<Image
src="/hero.jpg"
alt="Hero"
width={1200}
height={600}
priority
/>
// Responsive image with fill
<div className="relative aspect-video">
<Image
src="/product.jpg"
alt="Product"
fill
sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 50vw"
className="object-cover"
/>
</div>
// Parallel fetching
async function Dashboard() {
const [user, stats] = await Promise.all([
getUser(),
getStats()
]);
return <div>...</div>;
}
// Streaming with Suspense
async function ProductPage({ params }) {
return (
<div>
<ProductDetails id={params.id} />
<Suspense fallback={<ReviewsSkeleton />}>
<Reviews productId={params.id} />
</Suspense>
</div>
);
}
Reference: references/frontend_best_practices.md
<button>, <nav>, <main>)// Accessible button
<button
type="button"
aria-label="Close dialog"
onClick={onClose}
className="focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-blue-500"
>
<XIcon aria-hidden="true" />
</button>
// Skip link for keyboard users
<a href="#main-content" className="sr-only focus:not-sr-only">
Skip to main content
</a>
// Component test with React Testing Library
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
test('button triggers action on click', async () => {
const onClick = vi.fn();
render(<Button onClick={onClick}>Click me</Button>);
await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'));
expect(onClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
// Test accessibility
test('dialog is accessible', async () => {
render(<Dialog open={true} title="Confirm" />);
expect(screen.getByRole('dialog')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByRole('dialog')).toHaveAttribute('aria-labelledby');
});
// next.config.js
const nextConfig = {
images: {
remotePatterns: [{ protocol: 'https', hostname: 'cdn.example.com' }],
formats: ['image/avif', 'image/webp'],
},
experimental: {
optimizePackageImports: ['lucide-react', '@heroicons/react'],
},
};
// Conditional classes with cn()
import { cn } from '@/lib/utils';
<button className={cn(
'px-4 py-2 rounded',
variant === 'primary' && 'bg-blue-500 text-white',
disabled && 'opacity-50 cursor-not-allowed'
)} />
// Props with children
interface CardProps {
className?: string;
children: React.ReactNode;
}
// Generic component
interface ListProps<T> {
items: T[];
renderItem: (item: T) => React.ReactNode;
}
function List<T>({ items, renderItem }: ListProps<T>) {
return <ul>{items.map(renderItem)}</ul>;
}
references/react_patterns.mdreferences/nextjs_optimization_guide.mdreferences/frontend_best_practices.mdreferences/forcing_questions.mdreferences/composition_map.mdBefore this skill scaffolds a component, recommends a framework, or audits a bundle, the following four assumptions MUST be surfaced.
Verifiable success criteria (Karpathy #4) — every recommendation must include:
If any of those three is not stated, the recommendation is incomplete — return to Q2 of the forcing-question library.
The scripts/frontend_decision_engine.py tool encodes these checks: it refuses to recommend a profile without the four assumption inputs and prints the verifiable thresholds for the matched profile.
Four built-in profiles in profiles/ calibrate every recommendation:
| Profile | When to pick | LCP target (mobile-4G p75) | Bundle budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| next-app-router | SaaS customer-facing, SEO + dynamic, RSC-first | 2000ms | 150 KB-gzip / route |
| remix-or-sveltekit | Mobile-4G primary, low-JS-first, progressive enhancement | 1500ms | 80 KB-gzip / route |
| vite-spa | Auth-walled app, desktop/corporate primary | 2500ms | 200 KB init + 80 KB / route |
| astro-or-static | Marketing / docs / blog, near-zero write, SEO-critical | 1200ms | 30 KB JS / page |
Pick a profile via:
python scripts/frontend_decision_engine.py \
--primary-device mobile-4g --lcp-target-ms 2000 \
--seo-dependent true --auth-walled false --team-size 5
The tool returns the best-fit profile, the runner-up tradeoff (if within 15%), the stack picks, the anti-patterns to avoid on that profile, and the required CI gates.
To add a custom profile (e.g., your org's internal-tool defaults): copy profiles/vite-spa.json to profiles/<your-org>.json and adjust constraints + success_thresholds.
This skill does NOT reimplement scope owned by the POWERFUL-tier specialists. It forks into them. See references/composition_map.md for the full routing table. Key forks:
| Concern | Fork into |
|---|---|
| WCAG audit, contrast, screen-reader | engineering-team/skills/a11y-audit/ |
| Bundle profiling + runtime perf | engineering/skills/performance-profiler/ |
| Cinematic / scroll-storytelling landing | engineering-team/skills/epic-design/ |
| Apple HIG (iOS / macOS / visionOS) | product-team/skills/apple-hig-expert/ |
| Pre-commit Karpathy review | engineering/karpathy-coder/ |
| Pre-flight architecture grill | engineering/grill-me/ |
The cs-frontend-engineer agent orchestrates these forks via context: fork. Invoke it from another agent with Agent({subagent_type: "cs-frontend-engineer", prompt: "..."}) or via /cs:frontend-review <your problem>.
Before locking any framework or rendering decision, walk the seven forcing questions in references/forcing_questions.md. Discipline:
/tmp/frontend-grill-<date>.md.frontend_decision_engine.py with the seven answers.Summary:
Three surfaces:
/cs:frontend-review <prompt> — full grill + decision engine + composition routing.Agent({subagent_type: "cs-frontend-engineer", prompt: "..."}) — forks context, returns ≤ 200-word digest.python scripts/frontend_decision_engine.py ... — deterministic profile match when inputs are known.See agents/engineering/cs-frontend-engineer.md for the full invocation contract.
data-ai
Use when you want to understand what Claude contributed vs what you drove in a session. Triggers on: /collab-proof, session retrospective, ai contribution analysis, collaboration evidence, what did claude do.
data-ai
Personal coach that teaches users to become Claude power users. Use this skill the FIRST time a user asks to "learn Claude", "be a power user", "coach me", "teach me Claude tricks", "what can Claude do", "make me better at prompting", or any variation. After activation, also use it on EVERY subsequent turn to detect missed optimization opportunities (vague prompts, ignored capabilities, manual work Claude could automate) and surface a single power-user tip. Trigger generously — most users do not know what they do not know, so err on the side of coaching.
development
Use when designing or revisiting product pricing — selecting a pricing model (subscription seat-based, usage-based, value-based, freemium, or hybrid), running Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis on WTP survey data, or designing Good/Better/Best packaging tiers. Recommends a model and a price range with trade-offs, never a single number. For Commercial leads, Product Marketing, and CMOs at the pricing-design moment — not deal-by-deal discounting, not brand positioning.
testing
Use when a startup is approached by a prospective partner and someone has to decide should we sign this partner, at what partner tier (referral / reseller / OEM / SI-consulting / strategic alliance), with what joint GTM commitment, and at what revshare. Classifies partner tier from independent-demand evidence vs. preferential-terms hunting, designs a 90-day joint GTM plan, models revshare against direct-sale margin, and surfaces kill criteria for unwinding under-performing partnerships. For Head of Partnerships, Head of BD, and Founder-CEOs doing reseller agreement, OEM deal, or strategic alliance review — not technical sale enablement, not channel cost economics, not M&A.