engineering-team/skills/senior-devops/SKILL.md
Comprehensive DevOps skill for CI/CD, infrastructure automation, containerization, and cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure). Includes pipeline setup, infrastructure as code, deployment automation, and monitoring. Use when setting up pipelines, deploying applications, managing infrastructure, implementing monitoring, or optimizing deployment processes.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills senior-devopsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Complete toolkit for senior devops with modern tools and best practices.
This skill provides three core capabilities through automated scripts:
# Script 1: Pipeline Generator — scaffolds CI/CD pipelines for GitHub Actions or CircleCI
python scripts/pipeline_generator.py ./app --platform=github --stages=build,test,deploy
# Script 2: Terraform Scaffolder — generates and validates IaC modules for AWS/GCP/Azure
python scripts/terraform_scaffolder.py ./infra --provider=aws --module=ecs-service --verbose
# Script 3: Deployment Manager — orchestrates container deployments with rollback support
python3 scripts/deployment_manager.py ./deploy --verbose --json
Scaffolds CI/CD pipeline configurations for GitHub Actions or CircleCI, with stages for build, test, security scan, and deploy.
Example — GitHub Actions workflow:
# .github/workflows/ci.yml
name: CI/CD Pipeline
on:
push:
branches: [main, develop]
pull_request:
branches: [main]
jobs:
build-and-test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Set up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '20'
cache: 'npm'
- run: npm ci
- run: npm run lint
- run: npm test -- --coverage
- name: Upload coverage
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4
build-docker:
needs: build-and-test
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Build and push image
uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
with:
push: ${{ github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}
tags: ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }}
deploy:
needs: build-docker
if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Deploy to ECS
run: |
aws ecs update-service \
--cluster production \
--service app-service \
--force-new-deployment
Usage:
python scripts/pipeline_generator.py <project-path> --platform=github|circleci --stages=build,test,deploy
Generates, validates, and plans Terraform modules. Enforces consistent module structure and runs terraform validate + terraform plan before any apply.
Example — AWS ECS service module:
# modules/ecs-service/main.tf
resource "aws_ecs_task_definition" "app" {
family = var.service_name
requires_compatibilities = ["FARGATE"]
network_mode = "awsvpc"
cpu = var.cpu
memory = var.memory
container_definitions = jsonencode([{
name = var.service_name
image = var.container_image
essential = true
portMappings = [{
containerPort = var.container_port
protocol = "tcp"
}]
environment = [for k, v in var.env_vars : { name = k, value = v }]
logConfiguration = {
logDriver = "awslogs"
options = {
awslogs-group = "/ecs/${var.service_name}"
awslogs-region = var.aws_region
awslogs-stream-prefix = "ecs"
}
}
}])
}
resource "aws_ecs_service" "app" {
name = var.service_name
cluster = var.cluster_id
task_definition = aws_ecs_task_definition.app.arn
desired_count = var.desired_count
launch_type = "FARGATE"
network_configuration {
subnets = var.private_subnet_ids
security_groups = [aws_security_group.app.id]
assign_public_ip = false
}
load_balancer {
target_group_arn = aws_lb_target_group.app.arn
container_name = var.service_name
container_port = var.container_port
}
}
Usage:
python scripts/terraform_scaffolder.py <target-path> --provider=aws|gcp|azure --module=ecs-service|gke-deployment|aks-service [--verbose]
Orchestrates deployments with blue/green or rolling strategies, health-check gates, and automatic rollback on failure.
Example — Kubernetes blue/green deployment (blue-slot specific elements):
# k8s/deployment-blue.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: app-blue
labels:
app: myapp
slot: blue # slot label distinguishes blue from green
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: myapp
slot: blue
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: myapp
slot: blue
spec:
containers:
- name: app
image: ghcr.io/org/app:1.2.3
readinessProbe: # gate: pod must pass before traffic switches
httpGet:
path: /healthz
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 10
periodSeconds: 5
resources:
requests:
cpu: "250m"
memory: "256Mi"
limits:
cpu: "500m"
memory: "512Mi"
Usage:
python scripts/deployment_manager.py deploy \
--env=staging|production \
--image=app:1.2.3 \
--strategy=blue-green|rolling \
--health-check-url=https://app.example.com/healthz
python scripts/deployment_manager.py rollback --env=production --to-version=1.2.2
python scripts/deployment_manager.py --analyze --env=production # audit current state
references/cicd_pipeline_guide.md — detailed CI/CD patterns, best practices, anti-patternsreferences/infrastructure_as_code.md — IaC step-by-step processes, optimization, troubleshootingreferences/deployment_strategies.md — deployment strategy configs, security considerations, scalabilityscripts/ directory# Scaffold or update module
python scripts/terraform_scaffolder.py ./infra --provider=aws --module=ecs-service --verbose
# Validate and plan — review diff before applying
terraform -chdir=infra init
terraform -chdir=infra validate
terraform -chdir=infra plan -out=tfplan
# Apply only after plan review
terraform -chdir=infra apply tfplan
# Verify resources are healthy
aws ecs describe-services --cluster production --services app-service \
--query 'services[0].{Status:status,Running:runningCount,Desired:desiredCount}'
# Generate or update pipeline config
python scripts/pipeline_generator.py . --platform=github --stages=build,test,security,deploy
# Build and tag image
docker build -t ghcr.io/org/app:$(git rev-parse --short HEAD) .
docker push ghcr.io/org/app:$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)
# Deploy with health-check gate
python scripts/deployment_manager.py deploy \
--env=production \
--image=app:$(git rev-parse --short HEAD) \
--strategy=blue-green \
--health-check-url=https://app.example.com/healthz
# Verify pods are running
kubectl get pods -n production -l app=myapp
kubectl rollout status deployment/app-blue -n production
# Switch traffic after verification
kubectl patch service app-svc -n production \
-p '{"spec":{"selector":{"slot":"blue"}}}'
# Immediate rollback via deployment manager
python scripts/deployment_manager.py rollback --env=production --to-version=1.2.2
# Or via kubectl
kubectl rollout undo deployment/app -n production
kubectl rollout status deployment/app -n production
# Verify rollback succeeded
kubectl get pods -n production -l app=myapp
curl -sf https://app.example.com/healthz || echo "ROLLBACK FAILED — escalate"
Use these companion skills for cloud-specific deep dives:
| Skill | Cloud | Use When | |-------|-------|----------| | aws-solution-architect | AWS | ECS/EKS, Lambda, VPC design, cost optimization | | azure-cloud-architect | Azure | AKS, App Service, Virtual Networks, Azure DevOps | | gcp-cloud-architect | GCP | GKE, Cloud Run, VPC, Cloud Build (coming soon) |
Multi-cloud vs single-cloud decision:
Start single-cloud. Add a second cloud only when there is a concrete business or compliance driver — not for theoretical redundancy.
Terraform (or its open-source fork OpenTofu) is the recommended IaC tool for most teams:
Choose Pulumi when the team strongly prefers TypeScript, Python, Go, or C# over HCL:
| Tool | Use When | |------|----------| | CloudFormation | AWS-only shop; need native AWS support (StackSets, Service Catalog) | | Bicep | Azure-only shop; simpler syntax than ARM templates | | Cloud Deployment Manager | GCP-only; rare — most GCP teams prefer Terraform |
Rule of thumb: Use Terraform/OpenTofu unless you are 100% committed to a single cloud AND the cloud-native tool offers a feature Terraform cannot replicate (e.g., AWS Service Catalog integration).
Check the comprehensive troubleshooting section in references/deployment_strategies.md.
tools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.