engineering-team/skills/senior-data-scientist/SKILL.md
World-class senior data scientist skill specialising in statistical modeling, experiment design, causal inference, and predictive analytics. Covers A/B testing (sample sizing, two-proportion z-tests, Bonferroni correction), difference-in-differences, feature engineering pipelines (Scikit-learn, XGBoost), cross-validated model evaluation (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, SHAP), and MLflow experiment tracking — using Python (NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-learn), R, and SQL. Use when designing or analysing controlled experiments, building and evaluating classification or regression models, performing causal analysis on observational data, engineering features for structured tabular datasets, or translating statistical findings into data-driven business decisions.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills senior-data-scientistInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
World-class senior data scientist skill for production-grade AI/ML/Data systems.
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
def calculate_sample_size(baseline_rate, mde, alpha=0.05, power=0.8):
"""
Calculate required sample size per variant.
baseline_rate: current conversion rate (e.g. 0.10)
mde: minimum detectable effect (relative, e.g. 0.05 = 5% lift)
"""
p1 = baseline_rate
p2 = baseline_rate * (1 + mde)
effect_size = abs(p2 - p1) / np.sqrt((p1 * (1 - p1) + p2 * (1 - p2)) / 2)
z_alpha = stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2)
z_beta = stats.norm.ppf(power)
n = ((z_alpha + z_beta) / effect_size) ** 2
return int(np.ceil(n))
def analyze_experiment(control, treatment, alpha=0.05):
"""
Run two-proportion z-test and return structured results.
control/treatment: dicts with 'conversions' and 'visitors'.
"""
p_c = control["conversions"] / control["visitors"]
p_t = treatment["conversions"] / treatment["visitors"]
pooled = (control["conversions"] + treatment["conversions"]) / (control["visitors"] + treatment["visitors"])
se = np.sqrt(pooled * (1 - pooled) * (1 / control["visitors"] + 1 / treatment["visitors"]))
z = (p_t - p_c) / se
p_value = 2 * (1 - stats.norm.cdf(abs(z)))
ci_low = (p_t - p_c) - stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2) * se
ci_high = (p_t - p_c) + stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2) * se
return {
"lift": (p_t - p_c) / p_c,
"p_value": p_value,
"significant": p_value < alpha,
"ci_95": (ci_low, ci_high),
}
# --- Experiment checklist ---
# 1. Define ONE primary metric and pre-register secondary metrics.
# 2. Calculate sample size BEFORE starting: calculate_sample_size(0.10, 0.05)
# 3. Randomise at the user (not session) level to avoid leakage.
# 4. Run for at least 1 full business cycle (typically 2 weeks).
# 5. Check for sample ratio mismatch: abs(n_control - n_treatment) / expected < 0.01
# 6. Analyze with analyze_experiment() and report lift + CI, not just p-value.
# 7. Apply Bonferroni correction if testing multiple metrics: alpha / n_metrics
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler, OneHotEncoder
from sklearn.impute import SimpleImputer
from sklearn.compose import ColumnTransformer
def build_feature_pipeline(numeric_cols, categorical_cols, date_cols=None):
"""
Returns a fitted-ready ColumnTransformer for structured tabular data.
"""
numeric_pipeline = Pipeline([
("impute", SimpleImputer(strategy="median")),
("scale", StandardScaler()),
])
categorical_pipeline = Pipeline([
("impute", SimpleImputer(strategy="most_frequent")),
("encode", OneHotEncoder(handle_unknown="ignore", sparse_output=False)),
])
transformers = [
("num", numeric_pipeline, numeric_cols),
("cat", categorical_pipeline, categorical_cols),
]
return ColumnTransformer(transformers, remainder="drop")
def add_time_features(df, date_col):
"""Extract cyclical and lag features from a datetime column."""
df = df.copy()
df[date_col] = pd.to_datetime(df[date_col])
df["dow_sin"] = np.sin(2 * np.pi * df[date_col].dt.dayofweek / 7)
df["dow_cos"] = np.cos(2 * np.pi * df[date_col].dt.dayofweek / 7)
df["month_sin"] = np.sin(2 * np.pi * df[date_col].dt.month / 12)
df["month_cos"] = np.cos(2 * np.pi * df[date_col].dt.month / 12)
df["is_weekend"] = (df[date_col].dt.dayofweek >= 5).astype(int)
return df
# --- Feature engineering checklist ---
# 1. Never fit transformers on the full dataset — fit on train, transform test.
# 2. Log-transform right-skewed numeric features before scaling.
# 3. For high-cardinality categoricals (>50 levels), use target encoding or embeddings.
# 4. Generate lag/rolling features BEFORE the train/test split to avoid leakage.
# 5. Document each feature's business meaning alongside its code.
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold, cross_validate
from sklearn.metrics import make_scorer, roc_auc_score, average_precision_score
import xgboost as xgb
import mlflow
SCORERS = {
"roc_auc": make_scorer(roc_auc_score, needs_proba=True),
"avg_prec": make_scorer(average_precision_score, needs_proba=True),
}
def evaluate_model(model, X, y, cv=5):
"""
Cross-validate and return mean ± std for each scorer.
Use StratifiedKFold for classification to preserve class balance.
"""
cv_results = cross_validate(
model, X, y,
cv=StratifiedKFold(n_splits=cv, shuffle=True, random_state=42),
scoring=SCORERS,
return_train_score=True,
)
summary = {}
for metric in SCORERS:
test_scores = cv_results[f"test_{metric}"]
summary[metric] = {"mean": test_scores.mean(), "std": test_scores.std()}
# Flag overfitting: large gap between train and test score
train_mean = cv_results[f"train_{metric}"].mean()
summary[metric]["overfit_gap"] = train_mean - test_scores.mean()
return summary
def train_and_log(model, X_train, y_train, X_test, y_test, run_name):
"""Train model and log all artefacts to MLflow."""
with mlflow.start_run(run_name=run_name):
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
proba = model.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1]
metrics = {
"roc_auc": roc_auc_score(y_test, proba),
"avg_prec": average_precision_score(y_test, proba),
}
mlflow.log_params(model.get_params())
mlflow.log_metrics(metrics)
mlflow.sklearn.log_model(model, "model")
return metrics
# --- Model evaluation checklist ---
# 1. Always report AUC-PR alongside AUC-ROC for imbalanced datasets.
# 2. Check overfit_gap > 0.05 as a warning sign of overfitting.
# 3. Calibrate probabilities (Platt scaling / isotonic) before production use.
# 4. Compute SHAP values to validate feature importance makes business sense.
# 5. Run a baseline (e.g. DummyClassifier) and verify the model beats it.
# 6. Log every run to MLflow — never rely on notebook output for comparison.
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf
def diff_in_diff(df, outcome, treatment_col, post_col, controls=None):
"""
Estimate ATT via OLS DiD with optional covariates.
df must have: outcome, treatment_col (0/1), post_col (0/1).
Returns the interaction coefficient (treatment × post) and its p-value.
"""
covariates = " + ".join(controls) if controls else ""
formula = (
f"{outcome} ~ {treatment_col} * {post_col}"
+ (f" + {covariates}" if covariates else "")
)
result = smf.ols(formula, data=df).fit(cov_type="HC3")
interaction = f"{treatment_col}:{post_col}"
return {
"att": result.params[interaction],
"p_value": result.pvalues[interaction],
"ci_95": result.conf_int().loc[interaction].tolist(),
"summary": result.summary(),
}
# --- Causal inference checklist ---
# 1. Validate parallel trends in pre-period before trusting DiD estimates.
# 2. Use HC3 robust standard errors to handle heteroskedasticity.
# 3. For panel data, cluster SEs at the unit level (add groups= param to fit).
# 4. Consider propensity score matching if groups differ at baseline.
# 5. Report the ATT with confidence interval, not just statistical significance.
references/statistical_methods_advanced.mdreferences/experiment_design_frameworks.mdreferences/feature_engineering_patterns.md# Testing & linting
python -m pytest tests/ -v --cov=src/
python -m black src/ && python -m pylint src/
# Training & evaluation
python scripts/train.py --config prod.yaml
python scripts/evaluate.py --model best.pth
# Deployment
docker build -t service:v1 .
kubectl apply -f k8s/
helm upgrade service ./charts/
# Monitoring & health
kubectl logs -f deployment/service
python scripts/health_check.py
tools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.