engineering-team/skills/senior-data-engineer/SKILL.md
Data engineering skill for building scalable data pipelines, ETL/ELT systems, and data infrastructure. Expertise in Python, SQL, Spark, Airflow, dbt, Kafka, and modern data stack. Includes data modeling, pipeline orchestration, data quality, and DataOps. Use when designing data architectures, building data pipelines, optimizing data workflows, implementing data governance, or troubleshooting data issues.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills senior-data-engineerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Production-grade data engineering skill for building scalable, reliable data systems.
Activate this skill when you see:
Pipeline Design:
Architecture:
Data Modeling:
Data Quality:
Performance:
# Generate pipeline orchestration config
python scripts/pipeline_orchestrator.py generate \
--type airflow \
--source postgres \
--destination snowflake \
--schedule "0 5 * * *"
# Validate data quality
python scripts/data_quality_validator.py validate \
--input data/sales.parquet \
--schema schemas/sales.json \
--checks freshness,completeness,uniqueness
# Optimize ETL performance
python scripts/etl_performance_optimizer.py analyze \
--query queries/daily_aggregation.sql \
--engine spark \
--recommend
→ See references/workflows.md for details
Use this framework to choose the right approach for your data pipeline.
| Criteria | Batch | Streaming | |----------|-------|-----------| | Latency requirement | Hours to days | Seconds to minutes | | Data volume | Large historical datasets | Continuous event streams | | Processing complexity | Complex transformations, ML | Simple aggregations, filtering | | Cost sensitivity | More cost-effective | Higher infrastructure cost | | Error handling | Easier to reprocess | Requires careful design |
Decision Tree:
Is real-time insight required?
├── Yes → Use streaming
│ └── Is exactly-once semantics needed?
│ ├── Yes → Kafka + Flink/Spark Structured Streaming
│ └── No → Kafka + consumer groups
└── No → Use batch
└── Is data volume > 1TB daily?
├── Yes → Spark/Databricks
└── No → dbt + warehouse compute
| Aspect | Lambda | Kappa | |--------|--------|-------| | Complexity | Two codebases (batch + stream) | Single codebase | | Maintenance | Higher (sync batch/stream logic) | Lower | | Reprocessing | Native batch layer | Replay from source | | Use case | ML training + real-time serving | Pure event-driven |
When to choose Lambda:
When to choose Kappa:
| Feature | Warehouse (Snowflake/BigQuery) | Lakehouse (Delta/Iceberg) | |---------|-------------------------------|---------------------------| | Best for | BI, SQL analytics | ML, unstructured data | | Storage cost | Higher (proprietary format) | Lower (open formats) | | Flexibility | Schema-on-write | Schema-on-read | | Performance | Excellent for SQL | Good, improving | | Ecosystem | Mature BI tools | Growing ML tooling |
| Category | Technologies | |----------|--------------| | Languages | Python, SQL, Scala | | Orchestration | Airflow, Prefect, Dagster | | Transformation | dbt, Spark, Flink | | Streaming | Kafka, Kinesis, Pub/Sub | | Storage | S3, GCS, Delta Lake, Iceberg | | Warehouses | Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks | | Quality | Great Expectations, dbt tests, Monte Carlo | | Monitoring | Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog |
See references/data_pipeline_architecture.md for:
See references/data_modeling_patterns.md for:
See references/dataops_best_practices.md for:
→ See references/troubleshooting.md for details
development
Use when someone wants to run a weekly review, close open loops, audit stalled projects and commitments, get their system back to trusted, restart a lapsed review habit, or says "/cs:weekly-review". Walks David Allen's three-phase loop — GET CLEAR, GET CURRENT, GET CREATIVE — with deterministic scripts that inventory open loops, gate the checklist with named gaps, and score commitment health 0-100.
development
Use when someone wants to decide whether a meeting is worth calling, price a meeting in dollars, build a timeboxed agenda with desired outcomes, or turn messy meeting notes into owned action items — or says "should this be a meeting", "/cs:meeting-prep", or "/cs:meeting-actions". Runs a cost gate (ASYNC / NOT-READY / MEET), builds a decision-first agenda, and extracts an owner + due-date checklist that flags every orphan.
development
Convert a rambling description of a desired outcome into one polished, autonomous /goal prompt ready to paste into a fresh session. Use when the user says "/fable-goal", "turn this into a goal prompt", "write me a fable prompt", "write the prompt that builds X", or rambles about something they want made and asks for the prompt that makes it happen. The output is a single copy-paste prompt, never the build itself. Do NOT use when the user wants the thing built right now in this session — only when they want the PROMPT that will make it happen in a fresh session.
development
Use when someone wants to plan a deep work day, time-block their calendar or task list, budget or cut shallow work, protect focus hours, track deep-work sessions and streaks, run an end-of-day shutdown ritual, or says "/deep-work" or "/time-block". Classifies tasks deep vs shallow, builds an energy-first time-blocked schedule that refuses deep demand past the 4-hour ceiling, batches shallow work into at most two windows, and logs focus sessions against a weekly target.