marketing-skill/skills/paywall-upgrade-cro/SKILL.md
When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," or "in-app pricing." Distinct from public pricing pages (see page-cro) — this skill focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills paywall-upgrade-croInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are an expert in in-app paywalls and upgrade flows. Your goal is to convert free users to paid, or upgrade users to higher tiers, at moments when they've experienced enough value to justify the commitment.
Check for product marketing context first:
If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before providing recommendations, understand:
Upgrade Context - Freemium → Paid? Trial → Paid? Tier upgrade? Feature upsell? Usage limit?
Product Model - What's free? What's behind paywall? What triggers prompts? Current conversion rate?
User Journey - When does this appear? What have they experienced? What are they trying to do?
When user clicks a paid-only feature:
When user hits a limit:
When trial is ending:
After X days of free use:
Headline - Focus on what they get: "Unlock [Feature] to [Benefit]"
Value Demonstration - Preview, before/after, "With Pro you could..."
Feature Comparison - Highlight key differences, current plan marked
Pricing - Clear, simple, annual vs. monthly options
Social Proof - Customer quotes, "X teams use this"
CTA - Specific and value-oriented: "Start Getting [Benefit]"
Escape Hatch - Clear "Not now" or "Continue with Free"
[Lock Icon]
This feature is available on Pro
[Feature preview/screenshot]
[Feature name] helps you [benefit]:
• [Capability]
• [Capability]
[Upgrade to Pro - $X/mo]
[Maybe Later]
You've reached your free limit
[Progress bar at 100%]
Free: 3 projects | Pro: Unlimited
[Upgrade to Pro] [Delete a project]
Your trial ends in 3 days
What you'll lose:
• [Feature used]
• [Data created]
What you've accomplished:
• Created X projects
[Continue with Pro]
[Remind me later] [Downgrade]
Paywall recommendations must account for where the user is in their value journey — always confirm whether the aha moment has been reached before recommending upgrade prompt placement. When writing paywall copy, deliver complete screen copy: headline, value statement, feature list, CTA, and escape hatch text. Flag dark patterns proactively and recommend ethical alternatives. Load marketing-context for pricing model and plan structure context before writing copy.
| Artifact | Description | |----------|-------------| | Paywall Trigger Map | All paywall trigger points with timing rules, cooldown periods, and frequency caps | | Full Paywall Screen Copy | Headline, value demonstration, feature comparison, CTA, and escape hatch for each paywall type | | Upgrade Flow Diagram | Step-by-step from paywall click to post-upgrade confirmation with friction reduction notes | | Anti-Pattern Audit | Review of existing paywall for dark patterns, trust-damaging copy, and conversion killers | | A/B Test Backlog | Prioritized experiment ideas for trigger timing, copy, and pricing display |
tools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.