ra-qm-team/skills/mdr-745-specialist/SKILL.md
EU MDR 2017/745 compliance specialist for medical device classification, technical documentation, clinical evidence, and post-market surveillance. Covers Annex VIII classification rules, Annex II/III technical files, Annex XIV clinical evaluation, and EUDAMED integration.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills mdr-745-specialistInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
EU MDR compliance patterns for medical device classification, technical documentation, and clinical evidence.
Classify device under MDR Annex VIII:
| Factor | Class I | Class IIa | Class IIb | Class III | |--------|---------|-----------|-----------|-----------| | Duration | Any | Short-term | Long-term | Long-term | | Invasiveness | Non-invasive | Body orifice | Surgical | Implantable | | System | Any | Non-critical | Critical organs | CNS/cardiac | | Risk | Lowest | Low-medium | Medium-high | Highest |
| Information Use | Condition Severity | Class | |-----------------|-------------------|-------| | Informs decision | Non-serious | IIa | | Informs decision | Serious | IIb | | Drives/treats | Critical | III |
Example 1: Absorbable Surgical Suture
Example 2: AI Diagnostic Software
Example 3: Cardiac Pacemaker
Prepare technical file per Annex II and III:
ANNEX II TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
├── Device description and UDI-DI
├── Label and instructions for use
├── Design and manufacturing info
├── GSPR compliance matrix
├── Benefit-risk analysis
├── Verification and validation
└── Clinical evaluation report
| Requirement | Evidence | Status | |-------------|----------|--------| | Safe design (GSPR 1-3) | Risk management file | ☐ | | Chemical properties (GSPR 10.1) | Biocompatibility report | ☐ | | Infection risk (GSPR 10.2) | Sterilization validation | ☐ | | Software requirements (GSPR 17) | IEC 62304 documentation | ☐ | | Labeling (GSPR 23) | Label artwork, IFU | ☐ |
| Class | Route | NB Involvement | |-------|-------|----------------| | I | Annex II self-declaration | None | | Is/Im | Annex II + IX/XI | Sterile/measuring aspects | | IIa | Annex II + IX or XI | Product or QMS | | IIb | Annex IX + X or X + XI | Type exam + production | | III | Annex IX + X | Full QMS + type exam |
Develop clinical evidence strategy per Annex XIV:
| Class | Minimum Evidence | Investigation | |-------|------------------|---------------| | I | Risk-benefit analysis | Not typically required | | IIa | Literature + post-market | May be required | | IIb | Systematic literature review | Often required | | III | Comprehensive clinical data | Required (Article 61) |
CER CONTENTS
├── Executive summary
├── Device scope and intended purpose
├── Clinical background (state of the art)
├── Literature search methodology
├── Data appraisal and analysis
├── Safety and performance conclusions
├── Benefit-risk determination
└── PMCF plan summary
Establish PMS system per Chapter VII:
| Component | Requirement | Frequency | |-----------|-------------|-----------| | PMS Plan | Article 84 | Maintain current | | PSUR | Class IIa and higher | Per class schedule | | PMCF Plan | Annex XIV Part B | Update with CER | | PMCF Report | Annex XIV Part B | Annual (Class III) | | Vigilance | Articles 87-92 | As events occur |
| Class | Frequency | |-------|-----------| | Class III | Annual | | Class IIb implantable | Annual | | Class IIb | Every 2 years | | Class IIa | When necessary |
| Timeline | Requirement | |----------|-------------| | 2 days | Serious public health threat | | 10 days | Death or serious deterioration | | 15 days | Other serious incidents |
Implement UDI system per Article 27:
| Module | Content | Actor | |--------|---------|-------| | Actor | Company registration | Manufacturer, AR | | UDI/Device | Device and variant data | Manufacturer | | Certificates | NB certificates | Notified Body | | Clinical Investigation | Study registration | Sponsor | | Vigilance | Incident reports | Manufacturer | | Market Surveillance | Authority actions | Competent Authority |
Required elements per Article 13:
references/mdr-classification-guide.md contains:
references/clinical-evidence-requirements.md contains:
references/technical-documentation-templates.md contains:
# Quick gap analysis
python scripts/mdr_gap_analyzer.py --device "Device Name" --class IIa
# JSON output for integration
python scripts/mdr_gap_analyzer.py --device "Device Name" --class III --output json
# Interactive assessment
python scripts/mdr_gap_analyzer.py --interactive
Analyzes device against MDR requirements, identifies compliance gaps, generates prioritized recommendations.
Output includes:
| Factor | Considerations | |--------|----------------| | Designation scope | Covers your device type | | Capacity | Timeline for initial audit | | Geographic reach | Markets you need to access | | Technical expertise | Experience with your technology | | Fee structure | Transparency, predictability |
data-ai
Use when you want to understand what Claude contributed vs what you drove in a session. Triggers on: /collab-proof, session retrospective, ai contribution analysis, collaboration evidence, what did claude do.
data-ai
Personal coach that teaches users to become Claude power users. Use this skill the FIRST time a user asks to "learn Claude", "be a power user", "coach me", "teach me Claude tricks", "what can Claude do", "make me better at prompting", or any variation. After activation, also use it on EVERY subsequent turn to detect missed optimization opportunities (vague prompts, ignored capabilities, manual work Claude could automate) and surface a single power-user tip. Trigger generously — most users do not know what they do not know, so err on the side of coaching.
development
Use when designing or revisiting product pricing — selecting a pricing model (subscription seat-based, usage-based, value-based, freemium, or hybrid), running Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis on WTP survey data, or designing Good/Better/Best packaging tiers. Recommends a model and a price range with trade-offs, never a single number. For Commercial leads, Product Marketing, and CMOs at the pricing-design moment — not deal-by-deal discounting, not brand positioning.
testing
Use when a startup is approached by a prospective partner and someone has to decide should we sign this partner, at what partner tier (referral / reseller / OEM / SI-consulting / strategic alliance), with what joint GTM commitment, and at what revshare. Classifies partner tier from independent-demand evidence vs. preferential-terms hunting, designs a 90-day joint GTM plan, models revshare against direct-sale margin, and surfaces kill criteria for unwinding under-performing partnerships. For Head of Partnerships, Head of BD, and Founder-CEOs doing reseller agreement, OEM deal, or strategic alliance review — not technical sale enablement, not channel cost economics, not M&A.