ra-qm-team/skills/isms-audit-expert/SKILL.md
Information Security Management System (ISMS) audit expert for ISO 27001 compliance verification, security control assessment, and certification support. Use when the user mentions ISO 27001, ISMS audit, Annex A controls, Statement of Applicability (SOA), gap analysis, nonconformity management, internal audit, surveillance audit, or security certification preparation. Helps review control implementation evidence, document audit findings, classify nonconformities, generate risk-based audit plans, map controls to Annex A requirements, prepare Stage 1 and Stage 2 audit documentation, and support corrective action workflows.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills isms-audit-expertInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Internal and external ISMS audit management for ISO 27001 compliance verification, security control assessment, and certification support.
| Risk Level | Audit Frequency | Examples | |------------|-----------------|----------| | Critical | Quarterly | Privileged access, vulnerability management, logging | | High | Semi-annual | Access control, incident response, encryption | | Medium | Annual | Policies, awareness training, physical security | | Low | Annual | Documentation, asset inventory |
Opening Meeting
Evidence Collection
Control Verification
Closing Meeting
Validation: All controls in scope assessed with documented evidence
For detailed technical verification procedures by Annex A control, see security-control-testing.md.
| Severity | Definition | Response Time | |----------|------------|---------------| | Major Nonconformity | Control failure creating significant risk | 30 days | | Minor Nonconformity | Isolated deviation with limited impact | 90 days | | Observation | Improvement opportunity | Next audit cycle |
Finding ID: ISMS-[YEAR]-[NUMBER]
Control Reference: A.X.X - [Control Name]
Severity: [Major/Minor/Observation]
Evidence:
- [Specific evidence observed]
- [Records reviewed]
- [Interview statements]
Risk Impact:
- [Potential consequences if not addressed]
Root Cause:
- [Why the nonconformity occurred]
Recommendation:
- [Specific corrective action steps]
Ensure documentation is complete:
Verify operational readiness:
| Period | Focus | |--------|-------| | Year 1, Q2 | High-risk controls, Stage 2 findings follow-up | | Year 1, Q4 | Continual improvement, control sample | | Year 2, Q2 | Full surveillance | | Year 2, Q4 | Re-certification preparation |
Validation: No major nonconformities at surveillance audits.
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
|--------|---------|-------|
| isms_audit_scheduler.py | Generate risk-based audit plans | python scripts/isms_audit_scheduler.py --year 2025 --format markdown |
# Generate annual audit plan
python scripts/isms_audit_scheduler.py --year 2025 --output audit_plan.json
# With custom control risk ratings
python scripts/isms_audit_scheduler.py --controls controls.csv --format markdown
| File | Content | |------|---------| | iso27001-audit-methodology.md | Audit program structure, pre-audit phase, certification support | | security-control-testing.md | Technical verification procedures for ISO 27002 controls | | cloud-security-audit.md | Cloud provider assessment, configuration security, IAM review |
| KPI | Target | Measurement | |-----|--------|-------------| | Audit plan completion | 100% | Audits completed vs. planned | | Finding closure rate | >90% within SLA | Closed on time vs. total | | Major nonconformities | 0 at certification | Count per certification cycle | | Audit effectiveness | Incidents prevented | Security improvements implemented |
data-ai
Use when you want to understand what Claude contributed vs what you drove in a session. Triggers on: /collab-proof, session retrospective, ai contribution analysis, collaboration evidence, what did claude do.
data-ai
Personal coach that teaches users to become Claude power users. Use this skill the FIRST time a user asks to "learn Claude", "be a power user", "coach me", "teach me Claude tricks", "what can Claude do", "make me better at prompting", or any variation. After activation, also use it on EVERY subsequent turn to detect missed optimization opportunities (vague prompts, ignored capabilities, manual work Claude could automate) and surface a single power-user tip. Trigger generously — most users do not know what they do not know, so err on the side of coaching.
development
Use when designing or revisiting product pricing — selecting a pricing model (subscription seat-based, usage-based, value-based, freemium, or hybrid), running Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis on WTP survey data, or designing Good/Better/Best packaging tiers. Recommends a model and a price range with trade-offs, never a single number. For Commercial leads, Product Marketing, and CMOs at the pricing-design moment — not deal-by-deal discounting, not brand positioning.
testing
Use when a startup is approached by a prospective partner and someone has to decide should we sign this partner, at what partner tier (referral / reseller / OEM / SI-consulting / strategic alliance), with what joint GTM commitment, and at what revshare. Classifies partner tier from independent-demand evidence vs. preferential-terms hunting, designs a 90-day joint GTM plan, models revshare against direct-sale margin, and surfaces kill criteria for unwinding under-performing partnerships. For Head of Partnerships, Head of BD, and Founder-CEOs doing reseller agreement, OEM deal, or strategic alliance review — not technical sale enablement, not channel cost economics, not M&A.