alirezarezvani/gdpr-audit-prep
compliance-os/skills/gdpr-audit-prep/SKILL.md
/cs:gdpr-audit-prep <scope> — GDPR audit 6-question Article-cited forcing interrogation. Use before annual internal GDPR review, post-breach internal audit, DPA investigation readiness, or acquisition due diligence.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills gdpr-audit-prepInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Jun 13, 2026, 4:16 AM20.6s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- gdpr-audit-prep
- description:
- /cs:gdpr-audit-prep <scope> — GDPR audit 6-question Article-cited forcing interrogation. Use before annual internal GDPR review, post-breach internal audit, DPA investigation readiness, or acquisition due diligence.
/cs:gdpr-audit-prep — GDPR DPO Forcing Questions
Command: /cs:gdpr-audit-prep <scope>
The GDPR DPO auditor pressure-tests any privacy compliance work. Six Article-cited questions before any internal audit, breach response, DPA investigation, or acquisition due diligence.
When to Run
- Before annual internal GDPR audit
- Before quarterly Article 30 RoPA refresh
- Before launching new high-risk processing (Article 35 DPIA required)
- Post-breach (Articles 33-34)
- Before DPA investigation response or supervisory authority engagement
- During acquisition due diligence (target company privacy posture)
- Quarterly during high-volume new-feature shipping
The Six DPO Questions
1. Show me the Article 30 RoPA — with last-updated date.
Most-cited finding area.
- Must include all Article 30(1)(a)-(g) elements for controllers
- Must include all Article 30(2)(a)-(d) elements for processors
- Updated within reasonable time of changes (90 days expected)
- Joint controller arrangements documented per Article 26
2. For this processing activity, what's the lawful basis under Article 6?
Article 6 is exclusive — pick ONE basis per purpose.
- Six options: consent / contract / legal obligation / vital interests / public task / legitimate interests
- Where "legitimate interests": LIA documented
- Where "consent": records per Article 7; withdrawal mechanism
- Special categories (Article 9) require an Article 9(2) exception
3. For high-risk processing, where's the DPIA per Article 35?
Required for high-risk; sample 3-5 activities.
- Article 35(7)(a)-(d) required elements:
- Systematic description of processing
- Necessity + proportionality assessment
- Risks to rights + freedoms
- Measures to address risks
- DPO consulted per Article 35(2)
- Article 36 prior consultation triggered for residual high risk
- For AI systems: integrates with EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA (cross-check with cs-ai-act-compliance)
4. Show me a DSAR from the last 30 days — and the response timing.
Articles 15-22 operational workflow.
- Response within 1 month (Article 12(3)); extension up to 2 months for complex requests
- Identity verification process documented
- Right of access response includes all Article 15 information
- Right to erasure (Article 17) workflow covers backups + processors
5. Show me Transfer Impact Assessments for the largest non-EU transfers.
Schrems II discipline.
- Adequacy decision OR SCCs (Article 46) OR derogation (Article 49)
- TIA per EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 + 02/2020
- Supplementary measures where TIA flagged risk
- US transfers covered by EU-US Data Privacy Framework adequacy (Jul 2023) — verify list of certified entities
6. Show me the breach log per Article 33(5) — all breaches, not just notifiable ones.
Article 33(5) requires logging ALL breaches.
- Internal breach detection mechanism documented
- Article 33 DPA notification within 72 hours (where required)
- Article 34 data subject notification (where high risk)
- Root cause + corrective action via CAPA system
- Cross-check with cs-ciso-iso27001 for A.5.24-27 incident management alignment
Workflow
# 1. Compliance posture
python ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/gdpr_compliance_checker.py compliance_state.json
# 2. DPIA for high-risk activities
python ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/dpia_generator.py processing_activity.json
# 3. DSAR workflow validation
python ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/data_subject_rights_tracker.py dsar_log.json
# 4. Cross-framework reuse with ISO 27001 + SOC 2 + ISO 42001
python ../../skills/compliance-os/scripts/cross_framework_mapper.py program.json
Output Format
# GDPR Audit Prep: <scope>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Article Citations:** Every finding cites Article + paragraph; no paraphrase.
## The Decision Being Made
[RoPA-refresh | DPIA-required | DSAR-workflow | transfer-risk | breach-followup | DPA-readiness]
## Article 30 RoPA Status
- Last refresh: YYYY-MM-DD
- Required elements present: yes/no per processing activity
- Joint controller arrangements: documented/missing
## Article 6 Lawful Basis Discipline
- Activities reviewed: N
- Legitimate-interests claims without LIA: <list>
- Article 9 special categories with documented exception: yes/no
## Article 35 DPIA Quality
- High-risk activities requiring DPIA: <list>
- DPIAs complete per Article 35(7): pass/fail per activity
- Article 36 prior consultation triggered: <list>
## Data Subject Rights (Articles 12-22)
- DSARs in last 90 days: N
- Average response time: X days (target: ≤ 30)
- Right to erasure backup-processor flow: complete/incomplete
## Article 28 Processor Management
- Processors reviewed: N
- Contracts with all Article 28(3)(a)-(j) clauses: % complete
- Sub-processor flow-down notification mechanism: yes/no
## Schrems II Transfer Status
- Non-EU transfers: <list>
- Mechanism per transfer: adequacy / SCCs / derogation
- TIA on file: yes/no per transfer
- Supplementary measures where needed: <list>
## Article 33-34 Breach Discipline
- Breach log last 12 months: N
- Article 33 notification timing: ≤ 72h ratio
- Article 34 data subject notification (where high risk): on-time ratio
## Cross-Framework Impact
- ISO 27001 Article 32 alignment: clean / gaps
- EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA integration: applicable / not
- SOC 2 Privacy TSC alignment (if scope): clean / gaps
## Verdict
🟢 DPA-READY | 🟡 GAPS-IDENTIFIED | 🔴 NOT-READY
## Top 3 Actions
[3 concrete next steps with owner + Article-cited timeline]
## Outside Counsel Required
[Article-level ambiguities flagged: Schrems II supplementary measure adequacy, EU AI Act ↔ GDPR interaction, sectoral derogation interpretation, novel DPA enforcement]
Routing
/cs:compliance-readiness— for multi-framework view/cs:iso27001-audit-prep— for Article 32 organizational measures/cs:ai-act-readiness— for EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA integration/cs:soc2-audit-prep— for SOC 2 Privacy TSC overlap/cs:gc-review— for novel-case legal review
Related
- Agent:
cs-dpo-gdpr - Skill:
gdpr-dsgvo-expert - Playbook: gdpr_audit_playbook.md
- Adjacent:
../iso27001-audit-prep/,../ai-act-readiness/,../soc2-audit-prep/,../compliance-readiness/
Version: 1.0.0
Related Skills
alirezarezvani/weekly-review
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when someone wants to run a weekly review, close open loops, audit stalled projects and commitments, get their system back to trusted, restart a lapsed review habit, or says "/cs:weekly-review". Walks David Allen's three-phase loop — GET CLEAR, GET CURRENT, GET CREATIVE — with deterministic scripts that inventory open loops, gate the checklist with named gaps, and score commitment health 0-100.
22,702SKILL.mdUpdated Jul 18, 2026
alirezarezvani/meetings
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when someone wants to decide whether a meeting is worth calling, price a meeting in dollars, build a timeboxed agenda with desired outcomes, or turn messy meeting notes into owned action items — or says "should this be a meeting", "/cs:meeting-prep", or "/cs:meeting-actions". Runs a cost gate (ASYNC / NOT-READY / MEET), builds a decision-first agenda, and extracts an owner + due-date checklist that flags every orphan.
22,702SKILL.mdUpdated Jul 18, 2026
alirezarezvani/fable-goal
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Convert a rambling description of a desired outcome into one polished, autonomous /goal prompt ready to paste into a fresh session. Use when the user says "/fable-goal", "turn this into a goal prompt", "write me a fable prompt", "write the prompt that builds X", or rambles about something they want made and asks for the prompt that makes it happen. The output is a single copy-paste prompt, never the build itself. Do NOT use when the user wants the thing built right now in this session — only when they want the PROMPT that will make it happen in a fresh session.
22,702SKILL.mdUpdated Jul 18, 2026
alirezarezvani/deep-work
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when someone wants to plan a deep work day, time-block their calendar or task list, budget or cut shallow work, protect focus hours, track deep-work sessions and streaks, run an end-of-day shutdown ritual, or says "/deep-work" or "/time-block". Classifies tasks deep vs shallow, builds an energy-first time-blocked schedule that refuses deep demand past the 4-hour ceiling, batches shallow work into at most two windows, and logs focus sessions against a weekly target.
22,702SKILL.mdUpdated Jul 18, 2026