c-level-advisor/c-level-agents/skills/cro-review/SKILL.md
/cs:cro-review <plan> — Pipeline-paranoid interrogation of revenue, win rate, NRR, and ramp time. Use when the forecast misses pipeline coverage, win rates drop, or before scaling the sales team.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills cro-reviewInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Command: /cs:cro-review <plan>
The pipeline-paranoid operator pressure-tests revenue assumptions. Six questions that surface next-quarter pain this quarter.
What is pipeline coverage for the current quarter, by stage?
What's win rate this quarter vs the last 4 — and what's the leak point?
What's gross retention, contraction, and expansion separately?
For the last 4 hires, how many days to first deal and to quota?
What's the median discount this quarter vs last 4? Where is it creeping?
What % of pipeline is marketing-sourced, sales-sourced, partner-sourced?
python ../../../skills/cro-advisor/scripts/revenue_forecast_model.py
python ../../../skills/cro-advisor/scripts/churn_analyzer.py
# CRO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Pipeline
- Coverage: X.Xx (target 3x+)
- Win rate: X% (4Q trend: ↑ / → / ↓)
- Top leaking stage: <name>
## Retention
- Gross retention: X%
- NRR: X%
- Expansion: X%
- Contraction: X%
## Ramp
- New hires last quarter: N
- Median days to first deal: X
- Median days to quota: X
## Discount
- Median discount this quarter: X%
- Trend vs 4Q ago: <delta>
## Source Mix
- Marketing: X% | Sales: X% | Partner: X%
## Verdict
🟢 ON PLAN | 🟡 GAP | 🔴 PIPELINE CRISIS
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]
/cs:cfo-review — does this hit the cash plan?/cs:cmo-review — is pipeline source-mix healthy?/cs:execute — quarterly plan if GREEN/cs:boardroom — if REDcs-cro-advisorcro-advisor../../../../business-growth/Version: 1.0.0
data-ai
Use when you want to understand what Claude contributed vs what you drove in a session. Triggers on: /collab-proof, session retrospective, ai contribution analysis, collaboration evidence, what did claude do.
data-ai
Personal coach that teaches users to become Claude power users. Use this skill the FIRST time a user asks to "learn Claude", "be a power user", "coach me", "teach me Claude tricks", "what can Claude do", "make me better at prompting", or any variation. After activation, also use it on EVERY subsequent turn to detect missed optimization opportunities (vague prompts, ignored capabilities, manual work Claude could automate) and surface a single power-user tip. Trigger generously — most users do not know what they do not know, so err on the side of coaching.
development
Use when designing or revisiting product pricing — selecting a pricing model (subscription seat-based, usage-based, value-based, freemium, or hybrid), running Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis on WTP survey data, or designing Good/Better/Best packaging tiers. Recommends a model and a price range with trade-offs, never a single number. For Commercial leads, Product Marketing, and CMOs at the pricing-design moment — not deal-by-deal discounting, not brand positioning.
testing
Use when a startup is approached by a prospective partner and someone has to decide should we sign this partner, at what partner tier (referral / reseller / OEM / SI-consulting / strategic alliance), with what joint GTM commitment, and at what revshare. Classifies partner tier from independent-demand evidence vs. preferential-terms hunting, designs a 90-day joint GTM plan, models revshare against direct-sale margin, and surfaces kill criteria for unwinding under-performing partnerships. For Head of Partnerships, Head of BD, and Founder-CEOs doing reseller agreement, OEM deal, or strategic alliance review — not technical sale enablement, not channel cost economics, not M&A.