engineering/code-tour/skills/code-tour/SKILL.md
Use when the user asks to create a CodeTour .tour file — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: create a tour, onboarding tour, architecture tour, PR review tour, explain how X works, vibe check, RCA tour, contributor guide, or any structured code walkthrough request.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills code-tourInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Create CodeTour files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs of a codebase that link directly to files and line numbers. CodeTour files live in .tours/ and work with the VS Code CodeTour extension.
A great tour is a narrative — a story told to a specific person about what matters, why it matters, and what to do next. Only create .tour JSON files. Never modify source code.
Before asking anything, explore the codebase:
In parallel: list root directory, read README, check config files. Then: identify language(s), framework(s), project purpose. Map folder structure 1-2 levels deep. Find entry points — every path in the tour must be real.
If the repo has fewer than 5 source files, create a quick-depth tour regardless of persona — there's not enough to warrant a deep one.
One message should be enough. Infer persona, depth, and focus silently.
| User says | Persona | Depth | |-----------|---------|-------| | "tour for this PR" | pr-reviewer | standard | | "why did X break" / "RCA" | rca-investigator | standard | | "onboarding" / "new joiner" | new-joiner | standard | | "quick tour" / "vibe check" | vibecoder | quick | | "architecture" | architect | deep | | "security" / "auth review" | security-reviewer | standard | | (no qualifier) | new-joiner | standard |
When intent is ambiguous, default to new-joiner persona at standard depth — it's the most generally useful.
Every file path and line number must be verified. A tour pointing to the wrong line is worse than no tour.
Save to .tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour.
{
"$schema": "https://aka.ms/codetour-schema",
"title": "Descriptive Title — Persona / Goal",
"description": "Who this is for and what they'll understand after.",
"ref": "<current-branch-or-commit>",
"steps": []
}
| Type | When to use | Example |
|------|-------------|---------|
| Content | Intro/closing only (max 2) | { "title": "Welcome", "description": "..." } |
| Directory | Orient to a module | { "directory": "src/services", "title": "..." } |
| File + line | The workhorse | { "file": "src/auth.ts", "line": 42, "title": "..." } |
| Selection | Highlight a code block | { "file": "...", "selection": {...}, "title": "..." } |
| Pattern | Regex match (volatile files) | { "file": "...", "pattern": "class App", "title": "..." } |
| URI | Link to PR, issue, doc | { "uri": "https://...", "title": "..." } |
| Depth | Steps | Use for | |-------|-------|---------| | Quick | 5-8 | Vibecoder, fast exploration | | Standard | 9-13 | Most personas | | Deep | 14-18 | Architect, RCA |
file path relative to repo root (no leading / or ./)file confirmed to existline verified by reading the filefile or directory anchornextTour matches another tour's title exactly if set| Persona | Goal | Must cover | |---------|------|------------| | Vibecoder | Get the vibe fast | Entry point, main modules. Max 8 steps. | | New joiner | Structured ramp-up | Directories, setup, business context | | Bug fixer | Root cause fast | Trigger -> fault points -> tests | | RCA investigator | Why did it fail | Causality chain, observability anchors | | Feature explainer | End-to-end | UI -> API -> backend -> storage | | PR reviewer | Review correctly | Change story, invariants, risky areas | | Architect | Shape and rationale | Boundaries, tradeoffs, extension points | | Security reviewer | Trust boundaries | Auth flow, validation, secret handling | | Refactorer | Safe restructuring | Seams, hidden deps, extraction order | | External contributor | Contribute safely | Safe areas, conventions, landmines |
file or directory step (never content-only first step — blank in VS Code)| Anti-pattern | Fix | |---|---| | File listing — "this file contains the models" | Tell a story. Each step depends on the previous. | | Generic descriptions | Name the specific pattern unique to this codebase. | | Line number guessing | Never write a line you didn't verify by reading. | | Too many steps for quick depth | Actually cut steps. | | Hallucinated files | If it doesn't exist, skip the step. | | Recap closing — "we covered X, Y, Z" | Tell the reader what they can now do. | | Content-only first step | Anchor step 1 to a file or directory. |
engineering/codebase-onboarding — for broader onboarding beyond toursengineering/pr-review-expert — for automated PR review workflowstools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.