c-level-advisor/skills/chief-of-staff/SKILL.md
C-suite orchestration layer. Routes founder questions to the right advisor role(s), triggers multi-role board meetings for complex decisions, synthesizes outputs, and tracks decisions. Every C-suite interaction starts here. Loads company context automatically.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills chief-of-staffInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The orchestration layer between founder and C-suite. Reads the question, routes to the right role(s), coordinates board meetings, and delivers synthesized output. Loads company context for every interaction.
chief of staff, orchestrator, routing, c-suite coordinator, board meeting, multi-agent, advisor coordination, decision log, synthesis
[INVOKE:role|question]
Examples:
[INVOKE:cfo|What's the right runway target given our growth rate?]
[INVOKE:board|Should we raise a bridge or cut to profitability?]
If loop detected: return to founder with "The advisors are deadlocked. Here's where they disagree: [summary]."
| Score | Signal | Action | |-------|--------|--------| | 1–2 | Single domain, clear answer | 1 role | | 3 | 2 domains intersect | 2 roles, synthesize | | 4–5 | 3+ domains, major tradeoffs, irreversible | Board meeting |
+1 for each: affects 2+ functions, irreversible, expected disagreement between roles, direct team impact, compliance dimension.
Full rules in references/routing-matrix.md.
| Topic | Primary | Secondary | |-------|---------|-----------| | Fundraising, burn, financial model | CFO | CEO | | Hiring, firing, culture, performance | CHRO | COO | | Product roadmap, prioritization | CPO | CTO | | Architecture, tech debt | CTO | CPO | | Revenue, sales, GTM, pricing | CRO | CFO | | Process, OKRs, execution | COO | CFO | | Security, compliance, risk | CISO | COO | | Company direction, investor relations | CEO | Board | | Market strategy, positioning | CMO | CRO | | M&A, pivots | CEO | Board |
Trigger: Score ≥ 4, or multi-function irreversible decision.
BOARD MEETING: [Topic]
Attendees: [Roles]
Agenda: [2–3 specific questions]
[INVOKE:role1|agenda question]
[INVOKE:role2|agenda question]
[INVOKE:role3|agenda question]
[Chief of Staff synthesis]
Rules: Max 5 roles. Each role one turn, no back-and-forth. Chief of Staff synthesizes. Conflicts surfaced, not resolved — founder decides.
Full framework in references/synthesis-framework.md.
Output format:
## What We Agree On
[2–3 consensus themes]
## The Disagreement
[Named conflict + each side's reasoning + what it's really about]
## Recommended Actions
1. [Action] — [Owner] — [Timeline]
...
## Your Decision Point
[One question. Two options with trade-offs. No recommendation — just clarity.]
Track decisions to ~/.claude/decision-log.md.
## Decision: [Name]
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Question: [Original question]
Decided: [What was decided]
Owner: [Who executes]
Review: [When to check back]
At session start: if a review date has passed, flag it: "You decided [X] on [date]. Worth a check-in?"
Before delivering ANY output to the founder:
agent-protocol/SKILL.md)The Chief of Staff routes to 28 skills total:
See references/routing-matrix.md for complete trigger mapping.
references/routing-matrix.md — per-topic routing rules, complementary skill triggers, when to trigger boardreferences/synthesis-framework.md — full synthesis process, conflict types, output formattools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.