c-level-advisor/skills/c-level-skills/SKILL.md
10 C-level advisory agent skills and plugins for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. CEO, CTO, COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO, Executive Mentor. Multi-role board meetings, strategy routing, structured recommendations. For founders needing executive-level decision support.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills c-level-advisorInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A complete virtual board of directors for founders and executives.
1. Run /cs:setup → creates company-context.md (all agents read this)
✓ Verify company-context.md was created and contains your company name,
stage, and core metrics before proceeding.
2. Ask any strategic question → Chief of Staff routes to the right role
3. For big decisions → /cs:board triggers a multi-role board meeting
✓ Confirm at least 3 roles have weighed in before accepting a conclusion.
/cs:setup — Onboarding QuestionnaireWalks through the following prompts and writes company-context.md to the project root. Run once per company or when context changes significantly.
Q1. What is your company name and one-line description?
Q2. What stage are you at? (Idea / Pre-seed / Seed / Series A / Series B+)
Q3. What is your current ARR (or MRR) and runway in months?
Q4. What is your team size and structure?
Q5. What industry and customer segment do you serve?
Q6. What are your top 3 priorities for the next 90 days?
Q7. What is your biggest current risk or blocker?
After collecting answers, the agent writes structured output:
# Company Context
- Name: <answer>
- Stage: <answer>
- Industry: <answer>
- Team size: <answer>
- Key metrics: <ARR/MRR, growth rate, runway>
- Top priorities: <answer>
- Key risks: <answer>
/cs:board — Full Board MeetingConvenes all relevant executive roles in three phases:
Phase 1 — Framing: Chief of Staff states the decision and success criteria.
Phase 2 — Isolation: Each role produces independent analysis (no cross-talk).
Phase 3 — Debate: Roles surface conflicts, stress-test assumptions, align on
a recommendation. Dissenting views are preserved in the log.
Use for high-stakes or cross-functional decisions. Confirm at least 3 roles have weighed in before accepting a conclusion.
When a question arrives without a role prefix, the Chief of Staff maps it to the appropriate executive using these primary signals:
| Topic Signal | Primary Role | Supporting Roles | |---|---|---| | Fundraising, valuation, burn | CFO | CEO, CRO | | Architecture, build vs. buy, tech debt | CTO | CPO, CISO | | Hiring, culture, performance | CHRO | CEO, Executive Mentor | | GTM, demand gen, positioning | CMO | CRO, CPO | | Revenue, pipeline, sales motion | CRO | CMO, CFO | | Security, compliance, risk | CISO | CTO, CFO | | Product roadmap, prioritisation | CPO | CTO, CMO | | Ops, process, scaling | COO | CFO, CHRO | | Vision, strategy, investor relations | CEO | Executive Mentor | | Career, founder psychology, leadership | Executive Mentor | CEO, CHRO | | Multi-domain / unclear | Chief of Staff convenes board | All relevant roles |
To bypass Chief of Staff routing and address one executive directly, prefix your question with the role name:
CFO: What is our optimal burn rate heading into a Series A?
CTO: Should we rebuild our auth layer in-house or buy a solution?
CHRO: How do we design a performance review process for a 15-person team?
The Chief of Staff still logs the exchange; only routing is skipped.
Input: "Should we raise a Series A now or extend runway and grow ARR first?"
Output format:
# Company Context
- Name: Acme Inc.
- Stage: Seed ($800K ARR)
- Industry: B2B SaaS
- Team size: 12
- Key metrics: 15% MoM growth, 18-month runway
- Top priorities: Series A readiness, enterprise GTM
CEO, CTO, COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO, Executive Mentor
Founder Onboard, Chief of Staff (router), Board Meeting, Decision Logger, Agent Protocol, Context Engine
Board Deck Builder, Scenario War Room, Competitive Intel, Org Health Diagnostic, M&A Playbook, International Expansion
Culture Architect, Company OS, Founder Coach, Strategic Alignment, Change Management, Internal Narrative
CLAUDE.md — full architecture diagram and integration guideagent-protocol/SKILL.md — communication standard and quality loop detailschief-of-staff/SKILL.md — routing matrix for all 28 skillstools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.