alirezarezvani/brief
c-level-advisor/c-level-agents/skills/brief/SKILL.md
/cs:brief <topic> — Generate a one-page strategy brief from an office-hours intake. First step in the strategic sprint pipeline. Use when a strategic question needs to be framed before boardroom deliberation — e.g. locking options, assumptions, and success criteria for a pricing change or a market-entry decision.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills briefInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Jun 13, 2026, 4:09 AM78.7s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- brief
- description:
- /cs:brief <topic> — Generate a one-page strategy brief from an office-hours intake. First step in the strategic sprint pipeline. Use when a strategic question needs to be framed before boardroom deliberation — e.g. locking options, assumptions, and success criteria for a pricing change or a market-entry decision.
/cs:brief — One-Page Strategy Brief
Command: /cs:brief <topic> or /cs:brief <office-hours-output>
Turns intake (raw question or office-hours output) into a one-page strategy brief that the boardroom can deliberate on. This is Step 1 of the strategic sprint pipeline.
Pipeline Position
/cs:office-hours → /cs:brief → /cs:boardroom → /cs:decide → /cs:execute → /cs:post-mortem
↑ you are here
Inputs
- A topic string, or
- An office-hours brief (preferred — more rigor)
~/.claude/company-context.md(loaded automatically)
Output
A single Markdown file under ~/.claude/briefs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md with this structure:
# Strategy Brief: <topic>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Author:** cs-chief-of-staff
**Status:** DRAFT | UNDER REVIEW | APPROVED | RETIRED
## Context
[1-2 paragraphs: where the company sits today on this topic — pulled from company-context.md]
## Question
[The one sentence question the boardroom must answer]
## Options
1. **Option A:** <name> — <one-sentence summary>
2. **Option B:** <name> — <one-sentence summary>
3. **Option C:** <name> — <one-sentence summary>
(Minimum 2 options. "Do nothing" is always an option.)
## Assumptions
- <assumption 1 — explicit>
- <assumption 2>
- <assumption 3>
## Constraints
- Time: <by when must this decide>
- Money: <budget envelope>
- People: <who can / can't be reallocated>
- Reversibility: <one-way door | two-way door>
## Affected Roles
[Which cs-* advisors should weigh in. Used to route to /cs:boardroom panel composition.]
- [ ] cs-ceo-advisor
- [ ] cs-cfo-advisor
- [ ] cs-cto-advisor
- [ ] cs-cmo-advisor
- [ ] cs-cro-advisor
- [ ] cs-cpo-advisor
- [ ] cs-coo-advisor
- [ ] cs-chro-advisor
- [ ] cs-ciso-advisor
- [ ] cs-general-counsel-advisor
- [ ] cs-cdo-advisor
- [ ] cs-caio-advisor
- [ ] cs-cco-advisor
- [ ] cs-vpe-advisor
- [ ] cs-chief-of-staff
## Success Criteria
[Measurable outcomes that define success — set BEFORE the decision]
- <metric 1, threshold, timeframe>
- <metric 2, threshold, timeframe>
## Kill Criteria
[What signal would tell you in 90 days that this was the wrong call]
- <metric, threshold, action if missed>
Workflow
- Load company-context.md via context-engine
- If input is office-hours output, parse the 6 answers
- If input is a raw topic, prompt the founder for the missing pieces
- Draft 2-3 options (never just one — every brief needs a counterfactual)
- Make assumptions and constraints explicit
- Identify affected roles → drives panel composition for
/cs:boardroom - Write success + kill criteria BEFORE the decision (this is the rigor moment)
- Save to
~/.claude/briefs/
Why This Step Exists
The biggest decision-making failure is debating implementation before agreeing on the question. The brief locks the question, options, and success criteria so the boardroom can deliberate without scope creep.
This is also the artifact handoff — the next command consumes this file, not your memory.
Routing
/cs:boardroom <brief>— multi-role deliberation/cs:cross-eval <brief>— multi-model sanity check before boardroom (for high-stakes)/cs:freeze <brief>— cooldown lock for irreversible decisions
Related
- Agent:
cs-chief-of-staff - Skills:
context-engine,board-meeting
Version: 1.0.0
Related Skills
alirezarezvani/collab-proof
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when you want to understand what Claude contributed vs what you drove in a session. Triggers on: /collab-proof, session retrospective, ai contribution analysis, collaboration evidence, what did claude do.
17,936SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 13, 2026
alirezarezvani/claude-coach
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Personal coach that teaches users to become Claude power users. Use this skill the FIRST time a user asks to "learn Claude", "be a power user", "coach me", "teach me Claude tricks", "what can Claude do", "make me better at prompting", or any variation. After activation, also use it on EVERY subsequent turn to detect missed optimization opportunities (vague prompts, ignored capabilities, manual work Claude could automate) and surface a single power-user tip. Trigger generously — most users do not know what they do not know, so err on the side of coaching.
17,936SKILL.mdUpdated May 23, 2026
alirezarezvani/pricing-strategist
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when designing or revisiting product pricing — selecting a pricing model (subscription seat-based, usage-based, value-based, freemium, or hybrid), running Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis on WTP survey data, or designing Good/Better/Best packaging tiers. Recommends a model and a price range with trade-offs, never a single number. For Commercial leads, Product Marketing, and CMOs at the pricing-design moment — not deal-by-deal discounting, not brand positioning.
17,936SKILL.mdUpdated May 20, 2026
alirezarezvani/partnerships-architect
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when a startup is approached by a prospective partner and someone has to decide should we sign this partner, at what partner tier (referral / reseller / OEM / SI-consulting / strategic alliance), with what joint GTM commitment, and at what revshare. Classifies partner tier from independent-demand evidence vs. preferential-terms hunting, designs a 90-day joint GTM plan, models revshare against direct-sale margin, and surfaces kill criteria for unwinding under-performing partnerships. For Head of Partnerships, Head of BD, and Founder-CEOs doing reseller agreement, OEM deal, or strategic alliance review — not technical sale enablement, not channel cost economics, not M&A.
17,936SKILL.mdUpdated May 20, 2026