engineering/agenthub/skills/agenthub/SKILL.md
Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills agenthubInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Spawn N parallel AI agents that compete on the same task. Each agent works in an isolated git worktree. The coordinator evaluates results and merges the winner.
| Command | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| /hub:init | Create a new collaboration session — task, agent count, eval criteria |
| /hub:spawn | Launch N parallel subagents in isolated worktrees |
| /hub:status | Show DAG state, agent progress, branch status |
| /hub:eval | Rank agent results by metric or LLM judge |
| /hub:merge | Merge winning branch, archive losers |
| /hub:board | Read/write the agent message board |
| /hub:run | One-shot lifecycle: init → baseline → spawn → eval → merge |
When spawning with --template, agents follow a predefined iteration pattern:
| Template | Pattern | Use Case |
|----------|---------|----------|
| optimizer | Edit → eval → keep/discard → repeat x10 | Performance, latency, size |
| refactorer | Restructure → test → iterate until green | Code quality, tech debt |
| test-writer | Write tests → measure coverage → repeat | Test coverage gaps |
| bug-fixer | Reproduce → diagnose → fix → verify | Bug fix approaches |
Templates are defined in references/agent-templates.md.
Trigger phrases:
The main Claude Code session is the coordinator. It follows this lifecycle:
INIT → DISPATCH → MONITOR → EVALUATE → MERGE
Run /hub:init to create a session. This generates:
.agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/config.yaml — task config.agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/state.json — state machine.agenthub/board/ — message board channelsRun /hub:spawn to launch agents. For each agent 1..N:
.agenthub/board/dispatch/isolation: "worktree"Run /hub:status to check progress:
dag_analyzer.py --status --session {id} shows branch stateprogress/ channel has agent updatesRun /hub:eval to rank results:
Run /hub:merge to finalize:
git merge --no-ff winner into base branchgit tag hub/archive/{session}/agent-{i}Each subagent receives this prompt pattern:
You are agent-{i} in hub session {session-id}.
Your task: {task description}
Instructions:
1. Read your assignment at .agenthub/board/dispatch/{seq}-agent-{i}.md
2. Work in your worktree — make changes, run tests, iterate
3. Commit all changes with descriptive messages
4. Write your result summary to .agenthub/board/results/agent-{i}-result.md
5. Exit when done
Agents do NOT see each other's work. They do NOT communicate with each other. They only write to the board for the coordinator to read.
hub/{session-id}/agent-{N}/attempt-{M}
YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS)Frontier = branch tips with no child branches. Equivalent to AgentHub's "leaves" query.
python scripts/dag_analyzer.py --frontier --session {id}
The DAG is append-only:
Location: .agenthub/board/
| Channel | Writer | Reader | Purpose |
|---------|--------|--------|---------|
| dispatch/ | Coordinator | Agents | Task assignments |
| progress/ | Agents | Coordinator | Status updates |
| results/ | Agents + Coordinator | All | Final results + merge summary |
---
author: agent-1
timestamp: 2026-03-17T14:30:22Z
channel: results
parent: null
---
## Result Summary
- **Approach**: Replaced O(n²) sort with hash map
- **Files changed**: 3
- **Metric**: 142ms (baseline: 180ms, delta: -38ms)
- **Confidence**: High — all tests pass
{seq:03d}-{author}-{timestamp}.mdBest for: benchmarks, test pass rates, file sizes, response times.
python scripts/result_ranker.py --session {id} \
--eval-cmd "pytest bench.py --json" \
--metric p50_ms --direction lower
The ranker runs the eval command in each agent's worktree directory and parses the metric from stdout.
Best for: code quality, readability, architecture decisions.
The coordinator reads each agent's diff (git diff base...agent-branch) and ranks by:
Run metric first. If top agents are within 10% of each other, use LLM judge to break ties.
init → running → evaluating → merged
→ archived (if no winner)
State transitions managed by session_manager.py:
| From | To | Trigger |
|------|----|---------|
| init | running | /hub:spawn completes |
| running | evaluating | All agents return |
| evaluating | merged | /hub:merge completes |
| evaluating | archived | No winner / all failed |
The coordinator should act when:
| Signal | Action |
|--------|--------|
| All agents crashed | Post failure summary, suggest retry with different constraints |
| No improvement over baseline | Archive session, suggest different approaches |
| Orphan worktrees detected | Run session_manager.py --cleanup {id} |
| Session stuck in running | Check board for progress, consider timeout |
# Copy to your Claude Code skills directory
cp -r engineering/agenthub ~/.claude/skills/agenthub
# Or install via ClawHub
clawhub install agenthub
| Script | Purpose |
|--------|---------|
| hub_init.py | Initialize .agenthub/ structure and session |
| dag_analyzer.py | Frontier detection, DAG graph, branch status |
| board_manager.py | Message board CRUD (channels, posts, threads) |
| result_ranker.py | Rank agents by metric or diff quality |
| session_manager.py | Session state machine and cleanup |
tools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.