.cursor/skills/business-plan-context/SKILL.md
Read and maintain business decisions in `business-plan-desicions/`. Use when any task touches product scope, pricing, audience, branding, copy, funnel structure, or go-to-market — read the folder first so decisions stay consistent, and write back when new decisions are made.
npx skillsauth add alexwox/genesis-template business-plan-contextInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Keep business decisions centralized, discoverable, and consistent across all agent work. The business-plan-desicions/ folder at the repo root is the single source of truth for product strategy, pricing, audience, branding, and go-to-market decisions. This skill ensures the agent reads existing decisions before acting and writes new decisions back when they're made.
Apply this skill when the task involves any of:
Also apply when the user says things like:
Before making any recommendation or change that touches business strategy, read the relevant files in business-plan-desicions/.
Procedure:
ls business-plan-desicions/If the folder is empty or the relevant topic has no document yet, say so and proceed — but flag that the decision should be written back after the task.
Do not make product, pricing, or audience recommendations that contradict existing decisions in this folder without explicitly flagging the contradiction and getting user approval to change it.
When a conversation produces a new business decision or updates an existing one, write it to the folder.
NNN-topic-name.md
NNN = zero-padded sequence number (001, 002, 003...)topic-name = kebab-case description of what the file coversExamples:
001-product-pricing-and-market-research.md002-target-avatar.md003-brand-guide.md004-funnel-and-checkout-flow.md005-launch-plan.mdEvery decision document should follow this structure:
# NNN — [Title]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Status:** Draft | Active | Superseded by NNN
---
## Context
[Why this decision was needed — 2-3 sentences]
## Decision
[The actual decision, stated clearly]
## Rationale
[Why this option was chosen over alternatives]
## Implications
[What this decision affects downstream — other decisions, implementation, constraints]
## Open questions
[Anything unresolved that needs follow-up]
## Sources
[If backed by research, list sources with dates]
Not every document needs all sections — use judgment. A brand guide will look different from a pricing decision. But every document needs at minimum: title, date, status, and the decision itself.
When a decision changes:
Superseded by NNN if it's a fundamental changeWhen the current task depends on a prior decision, cite it:
"Per
001-product-pricing-and-market-research.md, the $499 tier is an anchor with ~12% expected take rate. The checkout flow should present $249 as the recommended tier."
This keeps the human oriented and makes it easy to trace why a recommendation was made.
This is not exhaustive — add documents as decisions are made. Common topics:
| Topic | Covers | | ---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | | Product & pricing | SKU definitions, price ladder, guarantee structure, bundling rules | | Market research | Competitive landscape, market gaps, benchmark data | | Target avatar | Who the buyer is, what they need, where they hang out | | Brand guide | Name, positioning, voice, tone, visual identity, associations | | Messaging & copy | Headline frameworks, value propositions, objection handling | | Funnel & checkout | Page sequence, upsell/downsell paths, post-purchase flow | | Product specifications | What's included in each tier, delivery format, access rules | | Launch plan | Timeline, channels, launch sequence, success criteria | | Financial model | LTV projections, CAC targets, unit economics, revenue model | | Content strategy | Distribution channels, content calendar, SEO/social plan |
001-product-pricing-and-market-research.md, the agent wasted the user's time.001, don't redefine it in 004. Cross-reference instead.tools
Translate role-based organizations into workflow-based organizations by decomposing roles into scored tasks, extracting dark playbooks (proprietary tacit knowledge), formalizing workflows, calculating automation ROI, and producing a sequenced automation roadmap. Use when a company wants to identify what work can be automated, extract undocumented expert knowledge, or build an automation strategy.
development
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
development
Builds stakeholder-friendly project status updates from markdown sources. Use when asked for progress reports, implementation status, future plans, UI/UX flow summaries, infrastructure/data-flow summaries, risks, code smells, or scout-principle improvement notes.
development
Repeatable playbook for finding and interviewing key stakeholders to validate an offer pillar hypothesis. Produces a pain proximity map, target list, outreach plan, interview protocol, and structured synthesis of findings. Use when a hypothesis needs human validation before building.