bmad-planning-orchestrator/skills/bmad-parallel-plan/SKILL.md
Turns a sequential, ready-for-dev story backlog into conflict-free CONCURRENT WAVES. Builds a dependency DAG from epic order, per-story dependency maps, and Owned File/Module Scope overlaps, then topologically sorts it into parallel waves of mutually disjoint, dependency-satisfied stories (capped by maxParallel), and emits a parallelization-plan.md with per-story git-worktree branch names and an ordered merge sequence. Use when the user says "plan parallel work", "which stories can run in parallel", "parallelize the backlog", "build the wave plan", "parallelization plan", "conflict-free workstreams", "what can we run concurrently", "split into worktrees", "dependency graph for the stories", "merge order", or "how do I fan this backlog out to multiple dev agents". Run AFTER stories are ready-for-dev (scrum-master) and an architecture exists. This skill PLANS parallelism only — it does NOT run agents, spawn worktrees, write code, run tests, or perform git operations.
npx skillsauth add aj-geddes/claude-code-bmad-skills bmad-parallel-planInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Convert a linear backlog into waves of stories that can be developed at the same time without colliding — then describe exactly how to merge them back together. This skill produces a plan. Your external dev tools execute it.
Persona flavor: Winston (Architect) reasons about isolation; the workflow does the math.
git.parallelization-plan.md (plus an
optional dependency-graph.json / waves.json for traceability).| Artifact | Path (under output folder) | Used for |
|----------|---------------------------|----------|
| Sprint status | sprint-status.yaml | story ids, epic, status, dependency lists |
| Ready stories | stories/{epic}.{story}.{slug}.story.md | Owned File/Module Scope + Dependency Maps |
| Architecture | architecture.md | semantic-conflict prevention (boundaries, shared modules) |
| Config | userConfig.maxParallel (default 3) | wave width cap |
Only stories at status ready-for-dev (or later) are eligible for a wave.
Lean on architecture for semantic safety. Read architecture.md. Architecture is
what makes parallelism safe — clean module boundaries mean two stories touching
different components won't create a hidden semantic conflict even if the files differ.
Note any shared/cross-cutting modules (auth, config, DB schema, shared types); stories
that touch them are high-conflict and rarely parallelizable.
Read each story's Owned File/Module Scope. Every ready story declares the explicit
list of paths it may touch. Collect {story_id -> [paths]}. A missing or empty scope
is a planning blocker — flag it; do not guess.
Build the dependency DAG, then topologically sort into waves. Edges come from three conflict classes (see REFERENCE.md):
depends_on).Topologically sort: wave N = all stories whose dependencies are already satisfied by
waves < N AND that are pairwise file-disjoint AND pairwise semantically safe. Cap each
wave at maxParallel; overflow rolls to the next wave (lowest id first).
Emit parallelization-plan.md. For each wave, list the ready-for-dev stories; give
each an isolated git-worktree branch name and its disjoint file scope. Then give the
ordered merge sequence: lowest story id first into an integration branch, an
integration review checkpoint, then a single PR integration -> main.
done, re-sort remaining).maxParallel; report drift.State the intent, then proceed.
Both scripts are deterministic and read-only. Resolve paths via ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}.
# 1) Build the dependency DAG (edges + conflict class) from status + story scopes
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bmad-parallel-plan/scripts/build-dependency-graph.py" \
--status "<output>/sprint-status.yaml" \
--stories "<output>/stories" \
--out "<output>/dependency-graph.json"
# 2) Topologically sort into capped waves
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bmad-parallel-plan/scripts/plan-parallel-waves.py" \
--graph "<output>/dependency-graph.json" \
--max-parallel 3 \
--out "<output>/waves.json"
# 3) (Optional) cross-check two scope lists for overlap — shared orchestrator helper
bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/scope-conflict-check.sh" \
"<output>/stories/2.1.foo.story.md" "<output>/stories/2.2.bar.story.md"
Then render waves.json into the human-facing plan using
templates/parallelization-plan.template.md
and write it to <output>/parallelization-plan.md.
story/{epic}.{story}-{slug} (one worktree each, fully isolated).integration/wave-{N}.integration/wave-{N}.integration/wave-{N} -> main. Wave N+1 branches off the merged main.<output>/parallelization-plan.md — the deliverable.<output>/dependency-graph.json, <output>/waves.json — traceability (optional).<output>/decision-log.md noting maxParallel, wave count,
and any stories deferred for missing scope.depends_on.maxParallel; the dev tool enforces real concurrency, the plan must not exceed it.See REFERENCE.md for the wave algorithm, conflict classes, and merge-order rationale.
Part of the BMAD Planning & Orchestrator plugin — a Claude Code harness for the BMAD Method by the BMAD Code Organization (https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD). Implements the spirit of
bmad-parallel-plan. All methodology credit belongs to the BMAD Code Organization.
testing
Solutioning-phase UX planning skill (optional; activate when the project has a UI). Produces TWO planning documents: DESIGN.md (the visual system — design tokens, color palette, typography, spacing, component specs, WCAG 2.1 AA contract) and EXPERIENCE.md (user journeys, flow diagrams, screen states, error/empty/loading handling). Use when the user says "design the UX", "create UX planning docs", "define the design system", "map the user flows", "UX for this feature", "wireframe the flows", "what are the user journeys", "accessibility design", "WCAG compliance", "design tokens", "responsive design plan", "mobile-first design", or "create DESIGN.md / EXPERIENCE.md". Runs after architecture is drafted and before stories are created. Supports Create / Update / Validate intents.
testing
Quick Flow lightweight technical specification for small-scope work (1-15 stories). Replaces the full PRD + architecture pair when scope is small and requirements are clear. Produces bmad-output/tech-spec.md as the single planning artifact before story creation. Use when the user says: "write a tech spec", "create a technical specification", "I need a tech spec for this feature", "quick spec", "small project spec", "we don't need a full PRD", "just a tech spec", "spec out this change", "document this feature". QUICK FLOW TRACK ONLY (1-15 stories). If scope grows beyond ~15 stories or involves multiple teams / external integrations at scale, stop and redirect to bmad-prd + bmad-architecture instead — those skills are built for that complexity. Supports three intents: Create (new spec), Update (revise an existing tech-spec.md), Validate (review a draft for completeness against BMAD criteria).
tools
Orchestration handoff bridge: emits and maintains sprint-status.yaml as the project's sequencing system-of-record. Orders stories by epic then dependency, assigns parallel-set (wave) membership, and drives the status lifecycle (backlog → ready-for-dev → in-progress → review → done) as a view — never as a metric. Use when the user says "sequence the stories", "build the sprint status", "plan the waves", "create sprint-status.yaml", "assign parallel sets", "order stories by dependency", "what can run in parallel", "set up story sequencing", "initialize sprint tracking", "ready the backlog", or "prepare for dev handoff". Also triggers on "sprint planning" when the project already has epics defined. SCOPE: SEQUENCING AND ORCHESTRATION ONLY. No velocity, no burndown, no committed points, no coverage metrics. Capacity is expressed as wave width (concurrent story count), not points. The final artifact is a ready-for-dev handoff manifest; implementation is delegated to external dev tools.
development
Distills ANY messy input — brain dump, transcript, long PRD, stakeholder notes, feature request, voice memo — into a tight five-field SPEC.md kernel that any downstream planning skill can consume. The five fields are: Problem, Capabilities, Constraints, Non-Goals, Success Metrics. Use when the user says "create a spec", "write a spec for", "distill this into a spec", "I have a brain dump", "turn this into something structured", "clean up these notes", "make a SPEC from", "I want to define the problem", "help me scope this", "summarize what we're building", "I have a PRD but need a kernel", "what are we actually solving?", or drops raw text/transcript and asks for structure. Also use when starting any new initiative and a clean shared definition is missing.