bmad-planning-orchestrator/skills/bmad-epics-and-stories/SKILL.md
Solutioning flagship — shards a PRD + architecture into epics.md and individual {epic}.{story}.{slug}.story.md context objects, the LAST planning artifact before external dev handoff. Each story is a self-contained ~8K-token compiled context object: Dev Notes with SOURCE CITATIONS back to prd.md/architecture.md, Acceptance Criteria, Tasks/Subtasks mapped to ACs, Testing strategy, Dependency Maps, an explicit Owned File/Module Scope list (the lever for parallel-conflict-free scheduling), and Learnings from Previous Stories. Sized to one dev-day; split if larger; NO story points. Use when the user says "shard the PRD", "create epics", "break the PRD into epics", "break this epic into stories", "create stories", "create a story", "draft story files", "generate the story for X", "prepare stories for dev", "mark the story ready for dev", "validate this story", or "what stories are in this epic". Three intents: Create new epics/stories, Update an existing story, or Validate a draft against the contract.
npx skillsauth add aj-geddes/claude-code-bmad-skills bmad-epics-and-storiesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Track-adaptive sharding. Turn approved planning docs into the executable backlog: one
epics.md map plus per-story context objects. This is the final planning step — the next
thing that touches a story is an external dev tool, not this plugin.
Persona flavor: the Architect (Winston) shards; the PM (John) confirms scope. Lightweight flavor only — this is a workflow.
This skill PLANS. It NEVER writes application code, runs tests, lints, checks coverage, or
builds. The last artifact it emits is a story file marked status: ready-for-dev. Acceptance
Criteria, a Testing strategy, and Dev Notes are planning outputs you author. Executing
tests or writing implementation is out of scope — plan it and hand it off. If tempted to
"implement" or "run the suite", STOP.
| File | Why |
|------|-----|
| bmad-output/project-context.md | Project constitution — load every run |
| bmad-output/prd.md | Functional requirements, epic intent |
| bmad-output/architecture.md | Tech stack, components, module boundaries |
| bmad-output/ux-design.md (if present) | UI acceptance details |
| bmad-output/decision-log.md | Threaded decisions to honor |
| existing bmad-output/stories/*.story.md | Learnings + ID continuity |
Output folder default: bmad-output/ (honor user override). Stories go in
bmad-output/stories/, the map in bmad-output/epics.md.
epics.md, then compile story files.Ask which intent if ambiguous. Do not silently regenerate existing stories.
Pick interactively; the heuristic suggests, the user confirms.
epics.md.A story must be small enough for one agent session — roughly 2-8h, one dev-day max. If a story is larger, split it; never inflate scope to fill a sprint. There are NO Fibonacci points, NO velocity, NO burndown. Delivery is tracked by COUNT: stories remaining vs. completion rate. See REFERENCE.md for the split heuristics.
bmad-output/epics.md from templates/epic.template.md:
epic goal, in-scope requirements (cited), ordered story list, cross-epic dependencies.bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bmad-epics-and-stories/scripts/generate-story-id.sh <epic-number>
gives the next {epic}.{story} and a slug stub. Filename: {epic}.{story}.{slug}.story.md.(AC: #N).[Source: architecture.md#auth-service], [Source: prd.md#FR-12]). LOCKED.bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/scope-conflict-check.sh bmad-output/stories/
Resolve any overlapping Owned Scope before marking stories parallel-safe.backlog while drafting; flip to ready-for-dev only when every section
is complete, ACs are testable, scope is declared, and the conflict check is clean.decision-log.md; tell the user which stories are
ready-for-dev and hand off to the external dev tool. Do NOT implement.backlog → ready-for-dev → in-progress → review → done. This skill only owns
backlog and ready-for-dev. Everything past handoff belongs to external dev tooling.
Acceptance Criteria, Dev Notes, and Testing are LOCKED. The story template states that external dev tools MUST NOT edit them. They are the compiled, cited source of truth.
Pattern: parallel section/story generation — one agent per epic or per independent story.
| Agent | Task | Output |
|-------|------|--------|
| Agent N | Compile stories for Epic N as full context objects | bmad-output/stories/N.*.story.md |
Coordination: write shared context (PRD/architecture/track/sizing rule) to
bmad-output/context/sharding-context.md; fan out one agent per epic; on return, the main
context runs the scope-conflict check across ALL stories and resolves overlaps before any
story is marked ready-for-dev.
Example prompt:
Task: Compile stories for Epic 2 (Payments) as context objects.
Context: read bmad-output/context/sharding-context.md.
For each story: number AC, map every Task to an AC (AC: #N), cite Dev Notes to
prd.md/architecture.md sections, declare an explicit Owned File/Module Scope, leave
Dev Agent Record empty. Size to one dev-day; split anything larger. NO story points.
Output: bmad-output/stories/2.*.story.md, status: backlog.
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bmad-epics-and-stories/scripts/generate-story-id.sh — next {epic}.{story} ID + slug.${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/scope-conflict-check.sh — shared Owned-Scope overlap checker.
Part of the BMAD Planning & Orchestrator plugin — a Claude Code harness for the BMAD Method by the BMAD Code Organization (https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD). Implements the spirit of
bmad-create-epics-and-stories. All methodology credit belongs to the BMAD Code Organization.
testing
Solutioning-phase UX planning skill (optional; activate when the project has a UI). Produces TWO planning documents: DESIGN.md (the visual system — design tokens, color palette, typography, spacing, component specs, WCAG 2.1 AA contract) and EXPERIENCE.md (user journeys, flow diagrams, screen states, error/empty/loading handling). Use when the user says "design the UX", "create UX planning docs", "define the design system", "map the user flows", "UX for this feature", "wireframe the flows", "what are the user journeys", "accessibility design", "WCAG compliance", "design tokens", "responsive design plan", "mobile-first design", or "create DESIGN.md / EXPERIENCE.md". Runs after architecture is drafted and before stories are created. Supports Create / Update / Validate intents.
testing
Quick Flow lightweight technical specification for small-scope work (1-15 stories). Replaces the full PRD + architecture pair when scope is small and requirements are clear. Produces bmad-output/tech-spec.md as the single planning artifact before story creation. Use when the user says: "write a tech spec", "create a technical specification", "I need a tech spec for this feature", "quick spec", "small project spec", "we don't need a full PRD", "just a tech spec", "spec out this change", "document this feature". QUICK FLOW TRACK ONLY (1-15 stories). If scope grows beyond ~15 stories or involves multiple teams / external integrations at scale, stop and redirect to bmad-prd + bmad-architecture instead — those skills are built for that complexity. Supports three intents: Create (new spec), Update (revise an existing tech-spec.md), Validate (review a draft for completeness against BMAD criteria).
tools
Orchestration handoff bridge: emits and maintains sprint-status.yaml as the project's sequencing system-of-record. Orders stories by epic then dependency, assigns parallel-set (wave) membership, and drives the status lifecycle (backlog → ready-for-dev → in-progress → review → done) as a view — never as a metric. Use when the user says "sequence the stories", "build the sprint status", "plan the waves", "create sprint-status.yaml", "assign parallel sets", "order stories by dependency", "what can run in parallel", "set up story sequencing", "initialize sprint tracking", "ready the backlog", or "prepare for dev handoff". Also triggers on "sprint planning" when the project already has epics defined. SCOPE: SEQUENCING AND ORCHESTRATION ONLY. No velocity, no burndown, no committed points, no coverage metrics. Capacity is expressed as wave width (concurrent story count), not points. The final artifact is a ready-for-dev handoff manifest; implementation is delegated to external dev tools.
development
Distills ANY messy input — brain dump, transcript, long PRD, stakeholder notes, feature request, voice memo — into a tight five-field SPEC.md kernel that any downstream planning skill can consume. The five fields are: Problem, Capabilities, Constraints, Non-Goals, Success Metrics. Use when the user says "create a spec", "write a spec for", "distill this into a spec", "I have a brain dump", "turn this into something structured", "clean up these notes", "make a SPEC from", "I want to define the problem", "help me scope this", "summarize what we're building", "I have a PRD but need a kernel", "what are we actually solving?", or drops raw text/transcript and asks for structure. Also use when starting any new initiative and a clean shared definition is missing.