aiskillstore/cc-devflow-orchestrator

CC-DevFlow Orchestrator

Purpose

Guide users to the correct agent/command WITHOUT duplicating their detailed standards.

Workflow Map

🏢 项目级工作流（Project-Level, 项目初期执行一次）

/core-roadmap → ROADMAP.md + BACKLOG.md (产品路线图)
/core-architecture → ARCHITECTURE.md (系统架构设计)
/core-guidelines → frontend-guidelines.md / backend-guidelines.md (项目规范)
/core-style → STYLE.md (设计风格指南) 

📦 需求级工作流（Requirement-Level, 每个需求执行一次）

/flow-init → research.md + tasks.json + BRAINSTORM.md (研究初始化 + 头脑风暴)
     ↓
/flow-clarify → clarifications/*.md (11 维度歧义扫描, 可选)
     ↓
/flow-prd → PRD.md (invoke prd-writer agent, 需 BRAINSTORM.md 对齐)
     ↓
/flow-checklist → checklists/*.md (需求质量检查, 可选)
     ↓
/flow-tech → TECH_DESIGN.md + data-model + contracts (invoke tech-architect agent)
     ↓
/flow-ui → UI_PROTOTYPE.html (invoke ui-designer agent, 可选, 引用 STYLE.md)
     ↓
/flow-epic → EPIC.md + TASKS.md (invoke planner, bite-sized tasks)
     ↓
/flow-dev → TASKS.md execution (TDD + Autonomous mode default)
     ↓
/flow-review → SPEC_REVIEW.md + CODE_QUALITY_REVIEW.md (Two-Stage Review) 
     ↓
/flow-qa → QA reports (invoke qa-tester + security-reviewer agents)
     ↓
/flow-release → PR creation + deployment (分支完成决策)
     ↓
/flow-verify → consistency check (invoke consistency-checker agent, 任意阶段可调用)

🐛 Bug 修复工作流

/flow-fix "BUG-123|描述" → 系统化调试 (4阶段: Root Cause → Pattern → Hypothesis → TDD Fix)

说明:

• 项目级命令建立全局标准（SSOT），需求级命令引用这些标准
• /flow-init 包含 Brainstorming 阶段，生成 BRAINSTORM.md 作为需求「北极星」
• /flow-prd 需要 BRAINSTORM.md 对齐检查
• /flow-clarify 在 PRD 前可选执行，消除 research.md 中的歧义
• /flow-epic 使用 bite-sized tasks 原则 (2-5分钟/任务)
• /flow-dev 默认 Autonomous 模式（自动重试），使用 --manual 退出到 Manual 模式
• /flow-review 是新增的两阶段审查 (Spec Compliance → Code Quality)
• /flow-ui 和 /flow-dev 自动加载 devflow/STYLE.md（如存在）
• 项目级命令可按需执行，无严格顺序要求

Agent Delegation Guide

When User Asks About Requirements Clarification

• DO: Recommend /flow-clarify command → invokes clarify-analyst agent
• DON'T: Duplicate clarification logic (flow-clarify.md has ~128 lines)
• Link: See .claude/commands/flow-clarify.md for details
• Outputs: clarifications/[timestamp]-flow-clarify.md (澄清报告)
• Features: 11-dimension scan, ≤5 prioritized questions, session recovery

When User Asks About PRD

• DO: Recommend /flow-prd command → invokes prd-writer agent
• DON'T: Duplicate PRD standards (prd-writer agent has ~300 lines)
• Link: See .claude/agents/prd-writer.md for PRD details
• Standards: INVEST principles, Anti-Expansion mandate, Given-When-Then criteria

When User Asks About Requirement Quality Checklist

• DO: Recommend /flow-checklist command → invokes checklist-agent
• DON'T: Duplicate checklist standards (checklist-agent has ~180 lines)
• Link: See .claude/commands/flow-checklist.md for details
• Outputs: checklists/*.md (ux, api, security, performance, data, general)
• Features: 5 quality dimensions, Anti-Example rules, 80% gate threshold
• Level: Requirement-level (optional, before /flow-epic)

When User Asks About Tech Design

• DO: Recommend /flow-tech command → invokes tech-architect agent
• DON'T: Duplicate tech standards (tech-architect agent has ~516 lines)
• Link: See .claude/agents/tech-architect.md for design details
• Outputs: TECH_DESIGN.md, data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md

When User Asks About Design Style Guide

• DO: Recommend /core-style command → invokes style-guide-generator agent
• DON'T: Duplicate style guide standards (style-guide-generator agent has ~400 lines)
• Link: See .claude/agents/style-guide-generator.md for details
• Outputs: STYLE.md (project-level SSOT for visual consistency)
• Level: Project-level (execute once per project)

When User Asks About UI Prototype

• DO: Recommend /flow-ui command → invokes ui-designer agent
• DON'T: Duplicate UI standards (ui-designer agent has ~485 lines)
• Link: See .claude/agents/ui-designer.md for UI details
• Features: 80+ design masters sampling, responsive design, NO PLACEHOLDER, references STYLE.md

When User Asks About Task Planning

• DO: Recommend /flow-epic command → invokes planner agent
• DON'T: Duplicate planning logic (planner agent has ~400 lines)
• Link: See .claude/agents/planner.md for task breakdown rules
• Enforces: Phase -1 Gates (Articles VII, VIII, IX), TDD sequence

When User Asks About QA/Security

• DO: Recommend /flow-qa command → invokes qa-tester + security-reviewer agents
• DON'T: Duplicate QA standards (qa-tester agent has ~300 lines)
• Link: See .claude/agents/qa-tester.md for QA details

When User Asks About Code Review (v2.1.0 新增)

• DO: Recommend /flow-review command → invokes spec-reviewer + code-quality-reviewer agents
• DON'T: Duplicate review standards (Two-Stage Review)
• Link: See .claude/commands/flow-review.md for details
• Features: Stage 1 (Spec Compliance) → Stage 2 (Code Quality), 不信任实现者报告

When User Asks About Bug Fix (v2.1.0 新增)

• DO: Recommend /flow-fix command → 4-phase systematic debugging
• DON'T: Guess and fix without investigation
• Link: See .claude/commands/flow-fix.md for details
• Features: Root Cause → Pattern → Hypothesis → TDD Fix, Iron Law enforcement

Phase Gates (Quick Reference Only)

Entry Gates

• flow-init Entry: Git 工作区干净, main 分支
• flow-clarify Entry: research.md 存在, phase0_complete == true
• flow-prd Entry: BRAINSTORM.md 存在, research.md 无 TODO placeholder
• flow-checklist Entry: PRD.md 必须完成 (prd_complete == true)
• flow-tech Entry: PRD.md 必须完成
• flow-ui Entry: PRD.md 必须完成（可与 tech 并行）
• flow-epic Entry: PRD 完成，tech/ui 推荐但可选，Checklist Gate (如存在 checklists/)
• flow-dev Entry: EPIC.md + TASKS.md 存在
• flow-review Entry: development_complete == true
• flow-qa Entry: review_complete == true (或 development_complete)
• flow-release Entry: qa_complete == true

Exit Gates

• flow-init Exit: research.md 5-level quality check, BRAINSTORM.md 完整
• flow-clarify Exit: clarification report 完整, orchestration_status.clarify_complete == true
• flow-prd Exit: PRD.md 无 placeholder, Constitution 合规, BRAINSTORM 对齐
• flow-tech Exit: TECH_DESIGN.md + data-model + contracts 完整
• flow-epic Exit: TASKS.md TDD 顺序正确, bite-sized tasks, Phase -1 Gates 通过
• flow-dev Exit: 所有 TASKS 完成, TDD Checkpoint 通过, 测试通过
• flow-review Exit: SPEC_REVIEW.md + CODE_QUALITY_REVIEW.md 均 PASS
• flow-qa Exit: 无 high-severity 漏洞
• flow-release Exit: PR 创建成功, 分支决策完成

For Details: See orchestration_status.json and EXECUTION_LOG.md

State Machine: Status → Recommended Command

Read orchestration_status.json to determine current phase:

status: "initialized"
  → Recommend: /flow-clarify (optional, clarify ambiguities)
  → Alternative: /flow-prd (skip clarification, generate PRD directly)
  → Note: BRAINSTORM.md 已在 /flow-init 生成 

status: "clarify_complete" OR "clarify_skipped"
  → Recommend: /flow-prd (generate PRD)

status: "prd_complete"
  → Recommend: /flow-tech (generate technical design)
  → Alternative: /flow-ui (generate UI prototype, optional)

status: "tech_design_complete"
  → If UI not done: /flow-ui (optional)
  → Else: /flow-epic (generate EPIC and TASKS)

status: "epic_complete"
  → Recommend: /flow-dev (TDD development, Autonomous mode default)
  → Alternative: /flow-dev --manual (Manual mode for complex requirements) 

status: "development_complete"
  → Recommend: /flow-review (Two-Stage Code Review) 
  → Alternative: /flow-qa (skip review, go directly to QA)

status: "review_complete"
  → Recommend: /flow-qa (quality assurance and security review)

status: "qa_complete"
  → Recommend: /flow-release (create PR and release)

status: "released"
  → Recommend: /flow-verify (final consistency check)

Troubleshooting Quick Routing

Phase gate blocked?

• Action: Check orchestration_status.json for current status
• Script: Run .claude/scripts/check-prerequisites.sh --json

Document missing?

• Action: Check which phase is incomplete
• Script: Run .claude/scripts/generate-status-report.sh

Need detailed standards?

• Clarify: See flow-clarify.md command + clarify-analyst agent
• PRD: Consult prd-writer agent
• Tech: Consult tech-architect agent
• UI: Consult ui-designer agent
• Tasks: Consult planner agent
• QA: Consult qa-tester agent

Constitution violation?

• Real-time check: constitution-guardian guardrail (PreToolUse hook)
• Batch validation: Run .claude/scripts/validate-constitution.sh
• Reference: See .claude/rules/project-constitution.md
• Rationalization Library: See .claude/rules/rationalization-library.md

TDD order violated?

• Real-time check: devflow-tdd-enforcer guardrail (PreToolUse hook)
• Manual check: See TASKS.md, tests MUST be marked [x] before implementation
• TDD Skill: See .claude/skills/flow-tdd/SKILL.md

Auxiliary Commands

Status and Progress

• /flow-status - Query requirement progress
• /flow-update "REQ-123" "T012" - Update task completion
• /flow-restart "REQ-123" --from=epic - Resume interrupted workflow

Upgrade and Analysis

• /flow-upgrade "REQ-123" --analyze - PRD version upgrade impact analysis
• /flow-constitution - Constitution management
• /flow-verify "REQ-123" - Comprehensive consistency verification

Bug Fix

• /flow-fix "BUG-123|登录超时" - 系统化 BUG 修复 (4阶段调试法)
• /problem-analyzer "<issue>" - Problem diagnosis

Code Review

• /flow-review "REQ-123" - Two-Stage Code Review (Spec → Quality)
• /code-review-high "<diff>" - High-rigor code review

Integration with Other Skills

Guardrails (实时阻断)

• devflow-tdd-enforcer: Enforces TDD order in TASKS.md
• constitution-guardian: Enforces Constitution compliance

Workflow Skills

• flow-brainstorming: 需求头脑风暴，生成 BRAINSTORM.md
• flow-tdd: TDD Iron Law 执行
• flow-debugging: 4阶段系统化调试
• flow-receiving-review: 处理代码审查反馈
• flow-finishing-branch: 分支完成决策
• verification-before-completion: 验证闸门

Reference Skills

• devflow-file-standards: File naming and directory structure reference
• devflow-constitution-quick-ref: Constitution quick reference

Design Principle

This skill does NOT contain:

• ❌ Detailed agent execution standards (those are in agent files)
• ❌ Full Phase Gate validation logic (those are in flow command files)
• ❌ Complete Constitution articles (those are in project-constitution.md)

This skill ONLY contains:

• ✅ Workflow routing (which command to run next)
• ✅ Agent delegation (which agent handles what)
• ✅ Quick reference (Phase Gates summary, not full details)
• ✅ Links to detailed documentation

Rationale: Avoid duplication ("不重不漏" principle). Agents and Commands own detailed standards.