scientific-skills/Evidence Insights/research-article-weekly/SKILL.md
Generates a weekly academic literature report based on keywords using PubMed. Use when the user wants to track recent research progress on a specific topic, automatically retrieving, classifying, and summarizing relevant papers from the last 7 days.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills research-article-weeklyInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This skill generates a weekly report of academic literature for a given keyword. It searches PubMed for articles published in the last 7 days, classifies them into generic research categories (Fundamental, Applied, Methodology, Review, Other), and produces a summarized report. This tool is domain-agnostic and adapts to any research field indexed in PubMed.
scripts/pubmed_search.py is the most direct path to complete the request.research-article-weekly package behavior rather than a generic answer.scripts/pubmed_search.py.Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Evidence Insight/research-article-weekly"
python -m py_compile scripts/pubmed_search.py
python scripts/pubmed_search.py --help
Example run plan:
CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.python scripts/pubmed_search.py with the validated inputs.See ## Workflow above for related details.
scripts/pubmed_search.py.keywords: The search term(s) for the literature (e.g., "lung cancer", "CRISPR", "machine learning", "climate change").Search & Generate Draft Report: The skill executes the bundled Python script to search PubMed and generate a draft Markdown report using rule-based classification. This provides an immediate, usable output even without LLM processing.
python scripts/pubmed_search.py --keywords "{keywords}" --days 7 --limit 20 --format markdown
Refine Report (Optional - AI Enhanced):
If an AI environment is available, the Agent can take the raw JSON output (by running with --format json) or the draft Markdown report and refine it using the advanced logic below for better summarization and topic extraction.
Classification Logic (for AI Refinement): For each retrieved article (Title + Abstract), classify it using the following logic:
System Prompt:
Act as a versatile research analyst. Your task is to categorize the research article based on its title and abstract in relation to the user's keyword: "{keywords}".
Research Types:
- Fundamental Research: Theoretical studies, mechanisms, basic science, discovery, or foundational work.
- Applied Research: Practical applications, clinical trials, engineering implementations, case studies, or field deployments.
- Methodology & Tools: New algorithms, techniques, software, instruments, or experimental frameworks.
- Review & Survey: Literature reviews, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or perspectives.
- Other: Education, policy, news, editorials, or papers that do not fit the above.
- Irrelevant: Not related to the keyword.
Task:
- Assign the most appropriate Research Type from the list above.
- Extract a specific Topic Tag (1-3 words) representing the core subject (e.g., "Deep Learning", "Gene Editing", "Market Analysis").
Output Format: Return a valid JSON object:
{"type": "Research Type Name", "topic": "Topic Tag"}. Do not output anything else.
Generate Final Report (for AI Refinement): Group the articles by their assigned Research Type. For each type that contains articles, generate a summary section.
System Prompt:
Act as a comprehensive research summarizer compiling a "Weekly Research Update".
Input: A list of research papers (Title, Journal, Abstract, Topic Tag) belonging to the Research Type: "{category}".
Task: Write a concise, engaging summary for this research type.
- Synthesize: Group papers with similar Topic Tags and summarize their collective contribution.
- Highlight: Identify the most significant findings or innovations.
- Tone: Professional, objective, and adapted to the specific domain of the papers (e.g., formal for physics, analytical for social science). Avoid generic "excitement" unless warranted by a major breakthrough.
- Reference: List the papers with their Titles and Journals.
Format:
{Category Name}
[General Summary Paragraph highlighting key themes]
Key Updates:
- [Topic Tag]: [Summary of findings from related papers]. Refs: [Title] (Journal)
- ...
(If a paper stands alone, list it individually)
Final Output: Combine all sections into a single Markdown document titled "Weekly Research Report: {keywords}". Add a brief "Executive Summary" at the top highlighting the distribution of papers (e.g., "This week saw a focus on Applied Research in [Topic]...").
pubmed_search.py script. Do not hallucinate papers.tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.