scientific-skills/Data Analysis/rct-bias-assessment-rob2/SKILL.md
Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills rct-bias-assessment-rob2Install this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
4 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This skill assesses the risk of bias in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) using the ROB2 tool. It analyzes the text for specific domains (Randomization, Deviations, Missing Data, Measurement, Reported Result) and synthesizes an overall judgement.
scripts/assess_rob2.py is the most direct path to complete the request.rct-bias-assessment-rob2 package behavior rather than a generic answer.scripts/assess_rob2.py plus 1 additional script(s).references/ for task-specific guidance.Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.See ## Usage above for related details.
cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/rct-bias-assessment-rob2"
python -m py_compile scripts/assess_rob2.py
python scripts/assess_rob2.py --help
Example run plan:
CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.python scripts/assess_rob2.py with the validated inputs.scripts/assess_rob2.py with additional helper scripts under scripts/.references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.Refer to rob2_guidelines.md for the detailed questions and logic for each domain.
The final output should be a JSON object compatible with the following schema:
{
"Study": "Author, Year",
"D1": "Low/Some concerns/High",
"D2": "Low/Some concerns/High",
"D3": "Low/Some concerns/High",
"D4": "Low/Some concerns/High",
"D5": "Low/Some concerns/High",
"Overall": "Low/Some concerns/High"
}
When the user provides a PDF file path, use extract_pdf.py to extract the text content before assessment:
python extract_pdf.py
This script will:
gefitinib nejmoa0810699.pdf)full_text.txtUsage flow:
python extract_pdf.py to extract textfull_text.txt fileUse scripts/assess_rob2.py to clean the text output if needed (removing markdown code blocks) or to validate the JSON structure.
from scripts.assess_rob2 import clean_text
# usage
cleaned_json = clean_text(llm_output)
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.