scientific-skills/Evidence Insights/plagiarism-checker-pre-screener/SKILL.md
Use when: User provides text/document and asks to check originality, detect plagiarism, assess similarity, or rewrite high-duplicate content. Triggers: "check plagiarism", "originality check", "similarity detection", "改写重复内容", "降重", "查重", "原创性检测", "抄袭检查" Input: Text content or document (txt, md, docx support via text extraction) Output: Originality score, highlighted duplicate/similar paragraphs, paraphrasing suggestions
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills plagiarism-checker-pre-screenerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Pre-screens text for potential plagiarism by detecting similarity patterns and providing paraphrasing suggestions for high-duplicate sections.
AI自主验收状态: 需人工检查 This skill uses advanced NLP techniques. Results should be manually reviewed before submission.
python scripts/main.py --input "Your text here" --threshold 0.75
python scripts/main.py --file document.txt --output report.json
python scripts/main.py --input "text" --paraphrase --style academic
| Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|-----------|------|---------|-------------|
| --input | string | - | Direct text input (alternative to --file) |
| --file | path | - | Path to text file to analyze |
| --threshold | float | 0.70 | Similarity threshold (0.0-1.0) for flagging |
| --paraphrase | flag | false | Enable paraphrasing suggestions |
| --style | string | neutral | Paraphrasing style: academic/formal/casual/neutral |
| --output | path | stdout | Output file path (JSON format) |
| --segments | string | sentence | Analysis unit: sentence/paragraph |
{
"originality_score": 85.5,
"total_segments": 12,
"flagged_segments": 2,
"segments": [
{
"index": 1,
"text": "Original sentence text...",
"similarity_score": 0.92,
"flagged": true,
"paraphrase_suggestion": "Rewritten version..."
}
],
"summary": "Text shows high originality with minor flagged sections"
}
references/algorithm.md - Technical algorithm detailsreferences/paraphrasing_guide.md - Paraphrasing methodology| Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level | |----------------|------------|-------| | Code Execution | Python/R scripts executed locally | Medium | | Network Access | No external API calls | Low | | File System Access | Read input files, write output files | Medium | | Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low | | Data Exposure | Output files saved to workspace | Low |
# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.