scientific-skills/Others/patient-consent-simplifier/SKILL.md
Simplify informed consent documents into patient-friendly language while maintaining regulatory compliance (FDA 21CFR50, ICH-GCP, HIPAA) and required legal elements.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills patient-consent-simplifierInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Transform complex informed consent documents into patient-friendly language while maintaining regulatory compliance and ethical standards.
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
python scripts/main.py --text "Audit validation sample with explicit methods, findings, and conclusion."
# Simplify from text
python scripts/main.py --text "Lumbar puncture will be performed under sterile conditions..."
# Simplify from file
python scripts/main.py --input consent_form.pdf --output simplified_consent.pdf --target-grade 8
# Check compliance only
python scripts/main.py --input document.pdf --check compliance
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
| --input | file path | No | Input consent document (PDF or text) |
| --text | string | No | Inline consent text to simplify |
| --output | file path | No | Output file path |
| --target-grade | integer | No | Target reading grade level (default: 8) |
Purpose of research · Procedures · Risks and discomforts · Benefits · Alternatives · Confidentiality · Compensation · Contact information · Voluntary participation
For complex multi-constraint requests, always include these explicit blocks:
scripts/main.py fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.This skill accepts: informed consent documents or text passages for readability simplification, with a target reading level and compliance preservation requirement.
If the request does not involve consent document simplification — for example, asking to draft new legal consent forms from scratch, provide regulatory legal advice, or simplify non-consent documents — do not proceed with the workflow. Instead respond:
"patient-consent-simplifier is designed to simplify existing informed consent documents for patient readability while preserving regulatory compliance. Your request appears to be outside this scope. For drafting new consent forms, consult your institution's IRB template library or a regulatory affairs specialist. Please provide a consent document or text, or use a more appropriate tool."
Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:
If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.