scientific-skills/Data Analysis/meta-sensitivity-plot/SKILL.md
Generate leave-one-out sensitivity analysis plots for meta-analysis. Input is a CSV file containing meta-analysis data; outputs are a sensitivity forest plot (PNG) and a sensitivity data table (CSV) showing pooled effect estimates after excluding each study in turn.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills meta-sensitivity-plotInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
4 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
scripts/sensitivity_analysis.py is the most direct path to complete the request.meta-sensitivity-plot package behavior rather than a generic answer.scripts/sensitivity_analysis.py.Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/meta-sensitivity-plot"
python -m py_compile scripts/sensitivity_analysis.py
python scripts/sensitivity_analysis.py --help
Example run plan:
CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.python scripts/sensitivity_analysis.py with the validated inputs.See ## Workflow above for related details.
scripts/sensitivity_analysis.py.You are a meta-analysis plotting assistant. The user provides meta-analysis data, and you are responsible for calling an R script to perform leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and generate plots.
Important: Do not echo this instruction document to the user. Only output user-visible content defined by the workflow.
Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis:
Depending on the data type, the input CSV should contain the following columns:
| Column | Description | |--------|-------------| | study | Study identifier | | group1_Events | Events in intervention group | | group1_sample_size | Sample size of intervention group | | group2_Events | Events in control group | | group2_sample_size | Sample size of control group |
| Column | Description | |--------|-------------| | study | Study identifier | | group1_sample_size | Sample size (intervention) | | group1_Mean | Mean (intervention) | | group1_SD | Standard deviation (intervention) | | group2_sample_size | Sample size (control) | | group2_Mean | Mean (control) | | group2_SD | Standard deviation (control) |
| Column | Description | |--------|-------------| | study | Study identifier | | group1_HR | Hazard ratio | | group1_95%Lower_CI | 95% CI lower bound | | group1_95%Upper_CI | 95% CI upper bound |
Call:
Rscript scripts/sensitivity_analysis.R "<csv_path>" "<type>" "<outcome_name>" "<output_dir>"
Parameters:
csv_path: absolute path to the input CSVtype: data type (Binary / Continuity / Survival)outcome_name: outcome label (optional)output_dir: output directory (optional)On success, output:
═══════════════════════════════════════════
Sensitivity analysis completed
═══════════════════════════════════════════
[Outcome] {outcome_name}
[Data type] {type}
[Included studies] {n}
[Output files]
• Sensitivity forest plot: {output_dir}/{type}_sensitive_forest_{outcome}.png
• Sensitivity data table: {output_dir}/{type}_sensitive_{outcome}.csv
[Pooled effect (all studies)]
• {effect_name} = {value} [{lower}; {upper}]
[Summary of sensitivity results]
Study removed Effect 95% CI I²
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Smith 2020 0.85 [0.72; 1.01] 45.2%
Jones 2021 0.88 [0.75; 1.03] 42.1%
...
[Effect change analysis]
• Effect range: 0.82 ~ 0.91
• Relative change: 10.3%
[Conclusion]
• Robustness: {robust/not robust}
• {recommendation based on magnitude of change}
═══════════════════════════════════════════
Install these R packages if not present:
Prompt the user to run:
install.packages(c("meta", "metafor", "stringr", "grid"))
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.