scientific-skills/Data Analysis/meta-forest-model-plot/SKILL.md
Generate forest plots for meta-analysis of survival data. Input is a CSV file containing study names, HR and 95% confidence intervals, output forest plot PNG and data table CSV. Supports both R and Python scripts.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills meta-forest-model-plotInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
4 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
scripts/forest_survival.py plus 1 additional script(s).Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/meta-forest-model-plot"
python -m py_compile scripts/forest_survival.py
python scripts/forest_survival.py --help
Example run plan:
CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.python scripts/forest_survival.py with the validated inputs.See ## Workflow above for related details.
scripts/forest_survival.py with additional helper scripts under scripts/.Run this minimal command first to verify the supported execution path:
python scripts/validate_skill.py --help
Users need to provide a CSV file with the following columns: | Column Name | Description | Example | |------|------|------| | study | Study name (author + year) | Smith 2020 | | outcome_new | Outcome indicator name | Overall Survival | | group1_HR | Hazard Ratio | 0.85 | | group1_95%Lower CI or group1_95.Lower.CI | 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound | 0.72 | | group1_95%Upper CI or group1_95.Upper.CI | 95% Confidence Interval Upper Bound | 1.01 |
Note: HR, Lower CI, and Upper CI must all be positive numbers.
If there are data issues, prompt the user to correct and resubmit.
Command:
Rscript scripts/forest_survival.R "<csv_path>" "<outcome_name>" "<output_dir>"
Command:
python scripts/forest_survival.py "<csv_path>" "<outcome_name>" "<output_dir>"
Parameter Description (same for both scripts):
csv_path: Absolute path to the input CSV fileoutcome_name: Outcome indicator name (optional, default extracted from data)output_dir: Output directory (optional, default is current directory)Upon successful execution:
═══════════════════════════════════════════
Forest Plot Generation Complete
═══════════════════════════════════════════
【Outcome Indicator】{outcome_name}
【Included Studies】{n} studies
【Output Files】
• Forest Plot: {output_dir}/Survival_forest_{outcome}.png
• Data Table: {output_dir}/Survival_forest_{outcome}.csv
【Pooled Effect Size】
• HR = {value} [{lower}; {upper}]
• P value = {p_value}
【Heterogeneity】
• I² = {I2}%
• Tau² = {tau2}
• Q test P value = {pval_Q}
═══════════════════════════════════════════
Install the following R packages:
If the user's environment is missing these packages, prompt them to run:
install.packages(c("meta", "metafor", "grid", "stringr"))
Install the following Python packages (Python 3.7+ recommended):
If the user's environment is missing these packages, prompt them to run:
pip install pandas numpy matplotlib scipy
Or in a virtual environment:
python -m pip install pandas numpy matplotlib scipy
## When Not to Use
- Do not use this skill when the required source data, identifiers, files, or credentials are missing.
- Do not use this skill when the user asks for fabricated results, unsupported claims, or out-of-scope conclusions.
- Do not use this skill when a simpler direct answer is more appropriate than the documented workflow.
## Required Inputs
- A clearly specified task goal aligned with the documented scope.
- All required files, identifiers, parameters, or environment variables before execution.
- Any domain constraints, formatting requirements, and expected output destination if applicable.
## Output Contract
- Return a structured deliverable that is directly usable without reformatting.
- If a file is produced, prefer a deterministic output name such as `meta_forest_model_plot_result.md` unless the skill documentation defines a better convention.
- Include a short validation summary describing what was checked, what assumptions were made, and any remaining limitations.
## Validation and Safety Rules
- Validate required inputs before execution and stop early when mandatory fields or files are missing.
- Do not fabricate measurements, references, findings, or conclusions that are not supported by the provided source material.
- Emit a clear warning when credentials, privacy constraints, safety boundaries, or unsupported requests affect the result.
- Keep the output safe, reproducible, and within the documented scope at all times.
## Failure Handling
- If validation fails, explain the exact missing field, file, or parameter and show the minimum fix required.
- If an external dependency or script fails, surface the command path, likely cause, and the next recovery step.
- If partial output is returned, label it clearly and identify which checks could not be completed.
## Quick Validation
Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible:
```bash
python scripts/forest_survival.py --help
```
Expected output format:
```text
Result file: meta_forest_model_plot_result.md
Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes
Assumptions: explicit list if any
```
## Deterministic Output Rules
- Use the same section order for every supported request of this skill.
- Keep output field names stable and do not rename documented keys across examples.
- If a value is unavailable, emit an explicit placeholder instead of omitting the field.
## Completion Checklist
- Confirm all required inputs were present and valid.
- Confirm the supported execution path completed without unresolved errors.
- Confirm the final deliverable matches the documented format exactly.
- Confirm assumptions, limitations, and warnings are surfaced explicitly.
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.