scientific-skills/Evidence Insights/literature-extensive-read/SKILL.md
--- name: literature-extensive-read description: Rapidly skim and summarize academic papers (default: PDF-to-Markdown full text with `## Page XX` pagination and image references) and output a structured extensive-reading summary in Markdown when you need to quickly understand research questions, methods, key results, conclusions, and decide whether intensive reading is worthwhile. license: MIT skill-author: AIPOCH --- ## When to Use - You have a paper converted from PDF to Markdown an
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills scientific-skills/Evidence Insights/literature-extensive-readInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
## Page XX pagination headers.) to briefly describe charts/tables when explicitly interpretable.outputs/ (created if missing).pdf-extract (version: Not specified) — used only when the input is PDF and must be converted to Markdown first.securityclaw (version: Not specified) — optional security audit report saved alongside outputs.Assume you have one of the following:
paper.md (contains full text, may include ## Page XX and image references)paper.pdf (convert it first using pdf-extract)pdf-extract paper.pdf > paper.md
paper.md, prioritizing: Title → Abstract → Conclusion, then scan Methods and Results.references/guide.mdassets/rapid_summary_template.mdoutputs/rapid_summary.mdsecurityclaw report to:
outputs/Input format
## Page XX may appear and should be treated as page markers, not section headings.) may be used to support brief figure/table descriptions only when the content is explicitly interpretable.Reading strategy (algorithm)
Output rules
assets/rapid_summary_template.md as the sole structure for the final summary..md) and saved in UTF-8 to avoid encoding issues.tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.