scientific-skills/Evidence Insights/encode-api/SKILL.md
Access the ENCODE Project REST API to search for and retrieve biological data (biosamples, experiments, etc.). Use this skill when the user needs to query ENCODE data, search by keywords, or retrieve specific objects by accession ID.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills encode-apiInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This skill allows you to interact with the ENCODE Project database via its REST API.
scripts/encode_client.py.requests (Install via pip install -r requirements.txt)See ## Usage above for related details.
cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Evidence Insight/encode-api"
python -m py_compile scripts/encode_client.py
python scripts/encode_client.py --help
Example run plan:
CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.python scripts/encode_client.py with the validated inputs.scripts/encode_client.py.You can use the provided Python script scripts/encode_client.py to perform searches or retrieve specific objects.
To search for data using keywords:
from scripts.encode_client import search_encode
results = search_encode(term="bone chip", limit=10)
print(results)
To retrieve a specific object (e.g., a Biosample or Experiment) by its accession ID:
from scripts.encode_client import get_object
data = get_object(accession="ENCBS000AAA")
print(data)
https://www.encodeproject.org/api_key and api_secret to the functions.encode_api_result.md unless the skill documentation defines a better convention.Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible:
python scripts/encode_client.py --help
Expected output format:
Result file: encode_api_result.md
Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes
Assumptions: explicit list if any
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.