scientific-skills/Evidence Insights/citation-management/SKILL.md
Comprehensive citation management for academic research; use when you need to discover papers (Google Scholar/PubMed), extract/verify metadata (DOI/PMID/arXiv/URL), and produce validated, clean BibTeX for manuscripts.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills citation-managementInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
4 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
.bib file before submission..bib files for LaTeX/Overleaf workflows and complements literature review pipelines.requests>=2.31.0scholarly>=1.7.11 (optional; required only for Google Scholar automation)A complete, end-to-end workflow that searches, extracts metadata, formats, deduplicates, and validates a bibliography:
# 1) Search PubMed (biomedical focus)
python scripts/search_pubmed.py \
--query '"CRISPR-Cas Systems"[MeSH] AND "Gene Editing"[MeSH]' \
--date-start 2020-01-01 \
--date-end 2024-12-31 \
--limit 200 \
--output crispr_pubmed.json
# 2) Search Google Scholar (broad coverage)
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "CRISPR gene editing therapeutics" \
--year-start 2020 \
--year-end 2024 \
--limit 100 \
--output crispr_scholar.json
# 3) Extract metadata from search outputs (or mixed identifiers)
cat crispr_pubmed.json crispr_scholar.json > combined_results.json
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
--input combined_results.json \
--output combined.bib
# 4) Add known papers by DOI (append)
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 >> combined.bib
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1126/science.aam9317 >> combined.bib
# 5) Format + deduplicate + sort (newest first)
python scripts/format_bibtex.py combined.bib \
--deduplicate \
--sort year \
--descending \
--output formatted.bib
# 6) Validate + auto-fix common issues + emit report
python scripts/validate_citations.py formatted.bib \
--auto-fix \
--report validation.json \
--output final_references.bib
# 7) Inspect validation results
cat validation.json
Google Scholar (scripts/search_google_scholar.py)
"deep learning"), author filters (author:LeCun), title-only (intitle:"neural networks"), exclusions (-survey), and year ranges.--year-start, --year-end: constrain publication years--limit: cap results--sort-by citations: prioritize highly cited papers (when supported by the script)PubMed (scripts/search_pubmed.py)
--query: supports MeSH terms, field tags, and Boolean logic--date-start, --date-end: publication date filtering--publication-types: e.g., Clinical Trial,Review--format: JSON or BibTeX output (if supported)(See: references/google_scholar_search.md, references/pubmed_search.md)
author, title, yearjournal, volume, number, pages, doibooktitle, pageseprint, archivePrefix)(See: references/metadata_extraction.md)
@article, @inproceedings, @book, @misc.-- (e.g., 123--145){CRISPR})Last, First and Last, First)FirstAuthorYearKeyword)(See: references/bibtex_formatting.md)
Validation typically checks:
doi.org and matches CrossRef metadata.Outputs may include a machine-readable report (e.g., JSON) with errors and warnings.
(See: references/citation_validation.md)
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.