scientific-skills/Others/chemical-storage-sorter/SKILL.md
Sort laboratory chemicals into safe storage groups by hazard classification (acids, bases, oxidizers, flammables, toxics). Identifies incompatible pairs, generates storage plans with warnings, and supports OSHA/NFPA compliance for lab safety.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills chemical-storage-sorterInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Organize laboratory chemicals into safe storage groups based on chemical compatibility and hazard classification. Prevents dangerous reactions by identifying incompatible pairs and providing segregation guidelines compliant with OSHA, NFPA, and institutional safety standards.
Key Capabilities:
This skill accepts: a list of chemical names (comma-separated or one per line), or a single chemical name for compatibility checking. Chemical names should be standard IUPAC or common names; CAS numbers are also accepted.
If the request does not involve sorting or checking laboratory chemicals for safe storage — for example, asking to synthesize chemicals, interpret SDS documents, or provide medical advice about chemical exposure — do not proceed. Instead respond:
"Chemical Storage Sorter is designed to classify and sort laboratory chemicals for safe storage. Please provide a list of chemical names. For other chemical safety tasks, use a more appropriate tool."
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
Fallback: If no chemicals are provided, respond: "No chemical list provided. Please supply chemical names via --chemicals or as a text list. Cannot sort without input chemicals."
from scripts.main import ChemicalStorageSorter
sorter = ChemicalStorageSorter()
group = sorter.classify_chemical("Hydrochloric acid") # → "acids"
| Group | Examples | Storage Requirements | |-------|----------|---------------------| | Acids | HCl, H₂SO₄, HNO₃ | Acid cabinet, secondary containment | | Bases | NaOH, KOH, ammonia | Base cabinet, separate from acids | | Oxidizers | H₂O₂, KMnO₄, nitrates | Cool, dry, away from organics | | Flammables | Ethanol, acetone, hexane | Flammable storage cabinet | | Toxics | Cyanides, mercury, arsenic | Locked cabinet, limited access | | General | NaCl, PBS, sucrose | Standard storage |
compatible, message = sorter.check_compatibility("Hydrochloric acid", "Sodium hydroxide")
# → False, "INCOMPATIBLE: acids cannot be stored with bases"
| Chemical Group | Incompatible With | Reaction Risk | |----------------|------------------|---------------| | Acids | Bases, oxidizers, cyanides | Violent neutralization, toxic gas | | Oxidizers | Flammables, acids, bases | Fire, explosion | | Flammables | Oxidizers, acids | Fire, combustion |
groups = sorter.sort_chemicals(inventory)
sorter.print_storage_plan(groups)
# Sort list of chemicals
python scripts/main.py --chemicals "HCl,NaOH,ethanol,H2O2"
# Check compatibility between two chemicals
python scripts/main.py --chemicals "HCl" --check "NaOH"
# List all storage groups
python scripts/main.py --list-groups
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
| --chemicals, -c | string | No | Comma-separated chemical list |
| --check | string | No | Check compatibility with another chemical |
| --list-groups, -l | flag | No | List all storage groups |
Every final response must make these explicit:
scripts/main.py fails, report the failure point and provide manual classification fallback using the hazard group table above.| Group | Cabinet Type | Special Requirements | |-------|-------------|---------------------| | Acids | Acid cabinet | Secondary containment, corrosion-resistant | | Bases | Base cabinet | Minimum 3 feet from acids | | Oxidizers | Standard/oxidizer | Away from ignition sources | | Flammables | Flammable cabinet | Bonding/grounding for dispensing | | Toxics | Locked cabinet | Access log, limited quantities |
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.