scientific-skills/Others/brainstorming/SKILL.md
Creative exploration and brainstorming; use it when you need to clarify goals/constraints, explore multiple options, and converge on a direction before implementation.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills brainstormingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
references/brainstorming-workflow.md.I want to build a feature that helps users learn faster in our app, but I’m not sure what exactly to build.
Constraints: 2-week implementation, no new backend services, must work on mobile.
Goal: increase weekly retention.
Please brainstorm options, compare them, and recommend a direction with next steps.
## 1) Clarify Goals & Boundaries
- Primary goal: increase weekly retention
- Constraints: 2-week build, no new backend services, mobile-first
- Success metrics: retention uplift, feature adoption, session frequency
## 2) Generate Options (Diverge)
1. **Spaced repetition reminders**
- What it is: ...
- Why it helps: ...
2. **Daily micro-challenges**
- What it is: ...
- Why it helps: ...
3. **Progress-based streaks + milestones**
- What it is: ...
- Why it helps: ...
4. **Personalized review queue (client-side)**
- What it is: ...
- Why it helps: ...
## 3) Compare & Evaluate
| Option | Effort | Risk | Expected impact | Notes |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---|
| Spaced repetition reminders | Medium | Low | Medium | ... |
| Daily micro-challenges | Medium | Medium | High | ... |
| Streaks + milestones | Low | Low | Medium | ... |
| Client-side review queue | Medium | Medium | Medium | ... |
## 4) Converge on a Recommendation
- Recommended direction: **Daily micro-challenges**
- Rationale: ...
- Key assumptions to validate: ...
## 5) Next Steps
- Prototype: ...
- Instrumentation: ...
- A/B test plan: ...
- Open questions: ...
Workflow: Follow the structured process described in references/brainstorming-workflow.md:
Core parameters to capture
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.