scientific-skills/Academic Writing/automated-soap-note-generator/SKILL.md
1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work. 2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported as.
npx skillsauth add aipoch/medical-research-skills automated-soap-note-generatorInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
scripts/main.py.references/ for task-specific guidance.Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.dataclasses: unspecified. Declared in requirements.txt.enum: unspecified. Declared in requirements.txt.See ## Usage above for related details.
cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Academic Writing/automated-soap-note-generator"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
Example run plan:
CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.python scripts/main.py with the validated inputs.See ## Workflow above for related details.
scripts/main.py.references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
python scripts/main.py --input "Audit validation sample with explicit symptoms, history, assessment, and next-step plan." --patient-id P12345 --provider "Dr. Smith" --format json
AI-powered clinical documentation tool that converts unstructured clinical input into professionally formatted SOAP notes compliant with medical documentation standards.
Key Capabilities:
Handle various input formats and prepare for NLP analysis:
from scripts.soap_generator import SOAPNoteGenerator
generator = SOAPNoteGenerator()
# Process text input
soap_note = generator.generate(
input_text="Patient presents with 2-day history of chest pain, radiating to left arm...",
patient_id="P12345",
encounter_date="2026-01-15",
provider="Dr. Smith"
)
# Process from audio transcript
soap_note = generator.generate_from_transcript(
transcript_path="consultation_transcript.txt",
patient_id="P12345"
)
Input Preprocessing Steps:
Parameters:
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description | Default |
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|---------|
| input_text | str | Yes* | Raw clinical text or dictation | None |
| transcript_path | str | Yes* | Path to transcript file | None |
| patient_id | str | No | Patient identifier (MUST be de-identified for testing) | None |
| encounter_date | str | No | Date in ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD) | Current date |
| provider | str | No | Healthcare provider name | None |
| specialty | str | No | Medical specialty context | "general" |
| verbose | bool | No | Include confidence scores | False |
*Either input_text or transcript_path required
Best Practices:
Identify and extract medical concepts from unstructured text:
# Extract entities with context
entities = generator.extract_medical_entities(
"Patient has history of hypertension and diabetes,
currently taking lisinopril 10mg daily and metformin 500mg BID"
)
# Returns structured entities:
# {
# "diagnoses": ["hypertension", "diabetes mellitus"],
# "medications": [
# {"name": "lisinopril", "dose": "10mg", "frequency": "daily"},
# {"name": "metformin", "dose": "500mg", "frequency": "BID"}
# ]
# }
Entity Types Recognized: | Category | Examples | Notes | |----------|----------|-------| | Diagnoses | diabetes, hypertension, pneumonia | ICD-10 compatible where possible | | Symptoms | chest pain, headache, nausea | Includes severity modifiers | | Medications | metformin, lisinopril, aspirin | Extracts dose, route, frequency | | Procedures | ECG, CT scan, blood draw | Includes body site | | Anatomy | left arm, chest, abdomen | Laterality and location | | Lab Values | glucose 120, BP 140/90 | Units and reference ranges | | Temporal | yesterday, 3 days ago, chronic | Normalized to relative dates |
Common Issues and Solutions:
Issue: Missed medications
Issue: Ambiguous abbreviations
Issue: Misspelled drug names
Automatically categorize sentences into appropriate SOAP sections:
# Classify content into SOAP sections
classified = generator.classify_soap_sections(
"Patient reports chest pain for 2 days. Physical exam shows BP 140/90.
Likely angina. Schedule stress test and start aspirin 81mg daily."
)
# Output structure:
# {
# "Subjective": ["Patient reports chest pain for 2 days"],
# "Objective": ["Physical exam shows BP 140/90"],
# "Assessment": ["Likely angina"],
# "Plan": ["Schedule stress test", "start aspirin 81mg daily"]
# }
Classification Rules: | Section | Content Type | Examples | |---------|--------------|----------| | S - Subjective | Patient-reported information | "Patient states...", "Patient reports...", "Complains of..." | | O - Objective | Observable/measurable findings | Vital signs, physical exam, lab results, imaging | | A - Assessment | Clinical interpretation | Diagnosis, differential, clinical impression | | P - Plan | Actions to be taken | Medications, procedures, follow-up, patient education |
Multi-label Handling: Some sentences span multiple sections (e.g., "Patient reports chest pain [S], which was sharp and 8/10 [S], with ECG showing ST elevation [O]")
Best Practices:
Parse and normalize timeline information:
# Extract temporal relationships
timeline = generator.extract_temporal_info(
"Patient had chest pain starting 3 days ago, worsening since yesterday.
Had similar episode 2 months ago that resolved with rest."
)
# Returns:
# {
# "onset": "3 days ago",
# "progression": "worsening",
# "previous_episodes": [
# {"time": "2 months ago", "resolution": "with rest"}
# ]
# }
Temporal Elements Extracted:
Normalization: Converts relative dates to standardized format:
Critical for accurate medical documentation:
# Detect negations and uncertainties
analysis = generator.analyze_certainty(
"Patient denies chest pain. No shortness of breath.
Possibly had fever yesterday but not sure."
)
# Identifies:
# - "denies chest pain" → Negative finding (important!)
# - "No shortness of breath" → Negative finding
# - "Possibly had fever" → Uncertain finding (flag for verification)
Detection Categories: | Type | Cues | Action | |------|------|--------| | Negation | denies, no, without, absent | Mark as negative finding | | Uncertainty | possibly, maybe, uncertain, ? | Flag for physician review | | Hypothetical | if, would, could | Note as conditional | | Family History | family history of, mother had | Separate from patient findings |
⚠️ Critical: Negation errors are high-risk (e.g., missing "denies" → documenting symptom they don't have)
Produce final formatted output:
# Generate complete SOAP note
soap_output = generator.generate_soap_document(
structured_data=classified,
format="markdown", # Options: markdown, json, hl7, text
include_metadata=True
)
Output Format:
# SOAP Note
**Patient ID:** P12345
**Date:** 2026-01-15
**Provider:** Dr. Smith
## Subjective
Patient reports [extracted symptoms with duration]. History of [chronic conditions].
Currently taking [medications]. Patient denies [negative findings].
## Objective
**Vital Signs:** [BP, HR, RR, Temp, O2Sat]
**Physical Examination:** [Exam findings by system]
**Laboratory/Data:** [Relevant results]
## Assessment
[Primary diagnosis/differential]
[Clinical reasoning summary]
## Plan
1. [Action item 1]
2. [Action item 2]
3. [Follow-up instructions]
---
*Generated by AI. REQUIRES PHYSICIAN REVIEW before entry into patient record.*
Export Formats: | Format | Use Case | Notes | |--------|----------|-------| | Markdown | Human review, documentation | Default, readable | | JSON | System integration, research | Structured data | | HL7 FHIR | EHR integration | Healthcare standard | | Plain Text | Simple documentation | Minimal formatting | | CSV | Data analysis, research | Tabular data export |
| Parameter | Type | Default | Required | Description |
|-----------|------|---------|----------|-------------|
| --input, -i | string | - | No | Input clinical text directly |
| --input-file, -f | string | - | No | Path to input text file |
| --output, -o | string | - | No | Output file path |
| --patient-id, -p | string | - | No | Patient identifier |
| --provider | string | - | No | Healthcare provider name |
| --format | string | markdown | No | Output format (markdown, json) |
# Generate SOAP from text
python scripts/main.py --input "Patient reports chest pain..." --output note.md
# From file
python scripts/main.py --input-file consultation.txt --patient-id P12345 --provider "Dr. Smith"
# JSON output
python scripts/main.py --input-file notes.txt --format json --output note.json
Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:
scripts/main.py fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of automated-soap-note-generator and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.
Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:
automated-soap-note-generatoronly handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.
Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:
If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.
tools
Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...
development
Generates complete conventional non-oncology bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, process-related gene family or biological theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on multi-dataset bulk transcriptome integration, DEG analysis, process-gene intersection, enrichment analysis, GSEA, PPI hub-gene prioritization, TF/miRNA regulatory networks, ROC-based biomarker evaluation, and immune infiltration analysis. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, enrichment/GSEA interpretation, hub-gene prioritization, regulatory-network and immune interpretation, multi-layer public validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
tools
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
testing
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.