offensive-tools/vuln-scanners/slither/SKILL.md
slither: smart contract static analyzer for Solidity and Vyper with detectors, printers, and custom analysis APIs. Use when auditing Foundry, Hardhat, Brownie, or standalone contracts for reentrancy, unsafe delegatecall, tx.origin misuse, upgradeability mistakes, weak randomness, and other EVM security issues.
npx skillsauth add aeondave/malskill slitherInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Fast static analysis for Solidity and Vyper codebases.
Use Slither when you need to:
# Recommended
uv tool install slither-analyzer
# Or pip
python3 -m pip install slither-analyzer
Upstream recommends solc-select or a supported build framework when multiple compiler versions are in play.
# Preferred for real projects with imports
slither .
# Single self-contained file
slither contracts/Token.sol
# Markdown checklist report
slither . --checklist
If the project uses Hardhat, Foundry, Brownie, or another framework, ensure its normal compile command succeeds before blaming Slither.
Run Slither from the project root, not from an isolated contract file, when imports and dependencies exist.
slither .
This gives broad coverage for issues like:
tx.origin misuseslither . --checklist
slither . --print human-summary
slither . --print call-graph,cfg,function-summary
Use printers for comprehension, not just bug hunting.
slither . --checklist
slither . --print human-summary,inheritance-graph,entry-points
Use Slither's Python API when a one-off audit question is too specific for stock detectors.
mythril for symbolic execution depth on suspicious paths.No bundled scripts/, references/, or assets/.
Use the upstream detector and printer documentation for the full detector list and tuning options.
data-ai
Scoped routing: Linux operator; hosts, sessions, users, services, packages, logs, containers, SSH, network paths, privilege evidence.
development
Offensive methodology for ICS/OT/SCADA environments in authorized industrial penetration testing and red team operations. Use when assessing PLCs, RTUs, HMIs, engineering workstations, historians, or field devices running Modbus, DNP3, EtherNet/IP, S7comm/S7+, Profinet, IEC 60870-5-104, BACnet, or OPC-UA. Covers passive OT network enumeration, protocol-level device interrogation, PLC coil/register read-write attacks, HMI session exploitation, historian and engineering workstation compromise, and safe escalation rules for critical infrastructure scope. Does not cover: general IT network exploitation (network-technique), physical hardware interfaces UART/JTAG/SPI (hardware-technique), wireless sensor network attacks (wireless-technique), RF/SDR signal analysis (hardware-ctf or wireless-technique), or CTF-framed ICS lab tasks (ics-ctf).
tools
Offensive methodology for authorized game security assessments, game client security research, and game-adjacent penetration testing in real-world engagements. Use when assessing game clients for cheating vulnerabilities, testing anti-cheat effectiveness, auditing game server protocols for score manipulation or economic fraud, reverse engineering game DRM or license validation, analyzing game save file protection, or assessing game mod/plugin security. Covers: process memory scanning and manipulation (Cheat Engine methodology), game binary reversing for license and DRM bypass, game network protocol analysis and packet replay, anti-cheat mechanism analysis, save file format reversing and tampering, speed hack and value injection techniques. Does NOT cover: CTF game challenges (game-ctf), game engine source code auditing (web-exploit-technique or vuln-search-technique for the backend), or general binary exploitation (pwn-ctf or reversing-technique).
development
Auth assessment: hardware/embedded methodology; UART/JTAG/SWD/SPI/I2C, firmware extraction, boot/debug paths, embedded OS evidence.