plugins/stardust/skills/uplift/SKILL.md
One-shot brand-faithful presales redesign of a website page. The user provides only the URL; everything else — extraction, tension identification, three differentiated variants (one fully cinematic), validation — is derived from the captured brand surface. Use when the user asks to "uplift", "refresh", or "redesign a site for presales" without wanting to coordinate the extract / direct / prototype chain themselves.
npx skillsauth add adobe/skills upliftInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
One entry point. One URL. Three presales-quality redesign variants.
uplift collapses the extract → direct → prototype × 3 chain into a
single opinionated command that picks every variability axis from the
captured brand surface rather than asking the user. The output is the
same as the long-form chain (state.json, brand-review.html, three
proposed files, motion validation) — the user just doesn't have to
coordinate it.
--page <slug> overrides.../prototype/reference/motion-registers.md § Selection
heuristic.reference/what-if-candidates.md or a derived
candidate per its § Extension rule. Different traits per variant.prototype/SKILL.md Phases 2.5–2.8 fires, including cinematic
Pass 6 for variant C.<URL> — required. The page to redesign. Defaults to homepage when
the URL has no path (https://example.com/ → home).--page <slug> — optional. Override the slug if the URL points
elsewhere or the user wants a different surface.--cinematic-register <name> — optional. Override the auto-picked
register for variant C. One of arrival, kinetic-display,
live-systems, editorial, kinetic-grid. Recorded as
registerSource: "user-override" in C's provenance.--two-variants — optional. Render only A and C (skip B). Useful
when the brand surface is thin and a forced three-way differentiation
would produce a weak middle (per the stop condition below).--re-extract — optional. Force a fresh crawl even when a prior
extraction of the same URL is < 7 days old (see § Setup,
reuse-if-fresh).There are no other flags. Everything else is derived from the captured brand surface or governed by the underlying skills' contracts.
../stardust/SKILL.md § Setup): impeccable dep check, context
loader, state read.extract will fail without it —
surface the same install message extract would).stardust/state.json if present. Reuse-if-fresh: when
a prior extraction of the same URL is < 7 days old, skip Phase 1
and render against the existing capture, with a one-line notice
("reusing extraction from <date> — pass --re-extract for a
fresh crawl"). --re-extract forces a fresh crawl regardless of
age; extractions ≥ 7 days old re-extract without asking.Six phases plus a reference-grounding interphase. Phases 1, 4, 5
delegate to existing skills; phases 2, 2.5, 3, 6 are owned by
uplift.
stardust:extract)Invoke stardust:extract <URL> --single (single-page mode).
Extract owns:
stardust/current/_brand-extraction.json (palette + type + motifs
stardust/current/pages/home.json (full per-page capture).stardust/current/brand-review.html with the tensions detectors
applied — this is the load-bearing input for Phase 2.stardust/current/PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md (descriptive — the
current state, not the target).uplift does not crawl beyond one page. The brand surface from a
single homepage is sufficient for three variants; multi-page extract
is what stardust:extract (without --single) is for.
uplift)Read stardust/current/brand-review.html § Tensions surfaced and
_brand-extraction.json. Produce two artifacts:
stardust/uplift-improvements.mdAt least 3 specific weaknesses observed in the captured site — as many as the evidence supports, no fixed count. Same load-bearing contract as the existing presales workflow: without specifics, "make it better" has no claim. Category tags (MAY repeat across items when the evidence supports it):
[dated-pattern] — patterns the design world has moved past (be
specific: "centered hero with stock photo + double CTA in primary
blue reads as the SaaS template circa 2019")[ia-clutter] — cluttered IA / unclear hierarchy / weak CTAs /
redundant sections[contrast-or-density] — contrast failures, accessibility gaps,
density issues[cliché] — conventions the brand could move past while staying
recognisably itself[missed-opportunity] — the captured surface doesn't capitalise
on its own strengths ("captured photography is excellent but the
layout crops it to thumbnail-size")Specificity bar — every item. Each item cites a measurement, tension ID, or screenshot observation from the capture, names the pattern at fault, and proposes one concrete fix. An item that fails the bar is cut, not padded.
Audit consumption. When stardust/audit/<domain-slug>/audit.json
exists for this origin (written by the stardust:audit skill),
consume its design findings as candidate improvements instead of
re-deriving them from scratch — cite the finding IDs in the item's
evidence and add the audit file to readArtifacts.
Refuse to proceed if fewer than 3 specific weaknesses can be named (see § Stop conditions).
Format (mirrors the provenance shape used by the rest of stardust):
---
_provenance:
writtenBy: stardust:uplift
writtenAt: <ISO-8601>
againstInput: <URL>
readArtifacts:
- stardust/current/_brand-extraction.json
- stardust/current/pages/<slug>.json
- stardust/current/brand-review.html
---
# Improvements — <URL>
1. **[<category-tag>]** <one-line headline> — <measurement /
tension ID / screenshot observation> · <pattern at fault> ·
fix: <one concrete fix>.
2. **[<category-tag>]** … (≥ 3 items; tags may repeat)
The bracketed tag preceding each weakness is a category from the list above. The headline is the one-sentence summary the agent will restate when variant A's shape brief applies the fix.
stardust/uplift-questions.mdSix to eight "what if we leaned into…" candidates derived from the
captured brand surface. Each candidate cites the captured evidence
that makes it concrete. Candidates are drawn from the catalog in
reference/what-if-candidates.md — eight worked examples that are
the floor, not a ceiling:
An out-of-catalog derived candidate is admissible when it
carries the same evidence shape as the catalog entries: ≥ 2
captured citations + an explicit disqualification test + the
variant role it serves (per reference/what-if-candidates.md
§ Extension rule). Record each candidate's source —
catalog | derived — in the candidate list.
For each candidate the agent generates: a one-line "what if…" phrasing, the captured evidence that makes the candidate concrete, the variant role it best serves (B's composition bet vs C's cinematic bet), and whether the candidate is disqualified for this brand (e.g. "Photography re-foregrounding disqualified — the captured photography is generic stock; amplifying it would expose the weakness").
The disqualification step is what keeps the agent from reflexively picking the same candidate for every brand.
uplift)When reference research is available (per
skills/stardust/reference/reference-research.md — when to fire,
the 3–5 reference budget, the evidence shape, and provenance
recording are all defined there), ground the Phase 2 claims in
real-world references before Phase 3 picks directions:
(a) Ground each [dated-pattern] claim in
uplift-improvements.md with a named contemporary
counter-example — a real site / screen citation showing what
the pattern's world moved to.
(b) Anchor variant B's composition bet with a named real-world
compositional anchor — a real screen whose composition the bet
resembles.
(c) Verify C's register pick against how motion is actually
used in the vertical — does the register match observed
contemporary practice for this kind of brand?
Record the references per reference-research.md's provenance
contract (_provenance.referencesUsed[] on the artifact each
grounding serves). When reference research is unavailable, skip
with a one-line note in that provenance and proceed — the phase
degrades gracefully.
This phase never replaces captured-evidence discipline: references justify the MOVE, captured evidence justifies the TRAIT. A candidate without captured citations is inadmissible no matter how well-referenced its move is.
uplift)Default: three variants (A + B + C). When --two-variants is
active, skip § 3c (B's candidate selection) and the direction.md
authored in § 3d declares only A + C. Phase 4 then writes only
DESIGN-A and DESIGN-C files at the project root, and Phase 5
renders accordingly. All downstream contracts (variant
differentiation, motion validation on C, summary in Phase 6)
operate over the reduced variant set without modification.
Read PRODUCT.md Brand Personality (from stardust/current/PRODUCT.md)
and apply the heuristic in ../prototype/reference/motion-registers.md
§ Selection heuristic. Record the picked register + the one-line
rationale.
The candidate must be the one the picked register naturally
amplifies through motion. The per-candidate Natural register
for C fields in reference/what-if-candidates.md are the single
source of truth for the register→candidate mapping — read the
mapping there (a derived candidate admitted per its § Extension
rule must declare the same field). This file does not duplicate
the table.
Fallback when C's natural candidates are all disqualified:
re-pick the second-choice register — the next-best match from
../prototype/reference/motion-registers.md § Selection heuristic
— and take its natural candidate. If the second-choice register's
natural candidates are also all disqualified, fall through to
--two-variants via stop condition (d): drop B and let C take the
strongest remaining non-disqualified candidate.
Pick from the remaining (non-disqualified, non-C) candidates in
uplift-questions.md. Prefer:
brand-review.html § Tensions.stardust/direction.mdWrite the resolved direction with three variant declarations:
## Variant A — Faithful + improvements
Role: risk-averse green-light. "Yes, that's us, with the obvious
fixes."
Composition: same as captured.
Motion: static (no cinematic layer).
Improvements applied: <list from uplift-improvements.md>.
## Variant B — What if we amplified <captured trait>?
Role: design-team motivator. The brand's underused capability
foregrounded.
What if: "<one-line "what if…" framing>"
Captured trait amplified: <trait from uplift-questions.md>
Evidence: <captured citation>
Composition: <specific layout strategy that amplifies the trait>
Motion: static (no cinematic layer).
## Variant C — What if motion was part of the identity?
Role: visionary pitch. The brand's third dimension — kinetic.
What if: "<one-line "what if…" framing tied to the register>"
Cinematic register: <register> (auto-picked from PRODUCT.md
Brand Personality)
Captured trait amplified: <trait — the one register naturally
amplifies>
Evidence: <captured citation>
Composition: identical IA to A; the bet is motion, not layout.
Motion: cinematic, register <register>.
stardust:direct)Invoke stardust:direct with the resolved direction. Pass the
three-variant declaration as the input phrase ("uplift presales
redesign — three variants per stardust/direction.md"). Direct owns:
uplift does not duplicate any of those checks; it relies on
direct's existing validators to refuse if the variants violate
the brand-faithful contract.
stardust:prototype)Render A first, then B and C:
stardust:prototype <slug> scoped to
variant A. A establishes and freezes the canon (tokens,
chrome, module renderings) that B and C inherit; rendering it
first removes the ordering race.state.json per
../stardust/reference/state-machine.md § Concurrency — so
in-place parallel rendering is unsafe. Parallel is permitted
only via isolated workspace copies: each subagent gets a copy
of the project (git worktree or directory copy) containing only
its own DESIGN-<id>.json at the root (siblings stashed), so
prototype's file-presence detection renders exactly that
variant. The subagent returns its <slug>-<id>-shape.md,
<slug>-<id>-proposed.html (and C's -cinematic.html) plus
provenance; the parent copies the artifacts back and performs
the single state.json update for both variants.open
mechanics in Phase 6 step 1) rather than waiting for all three.Prototype detects the variant set from the per-variant DESIGN-A,
DESIGN-B, DESIGN-C files that direct wrote in Phase 4 —
authoring <slug>-A-shape.md / -B-shape.md / -C-shape.md and
emitting <slug>-A-proposed.html / <slug>-B-proposed.html /
<slug>-C-proposed.html per the variant-convergence detector
contract (../prototype/SKILL.md § Phase 2.5 / Discipline 10).
Cinematic motion fires per-variant from the per-variant DESIGN
file, not from a CLI flag. Never pass --cinematic to
prototype from uplift. Because Phase 4 wrote
extensions.motion.register into DESIGN-C.json only (A and B
omit it), prototype's Phase 2.4 (motion application) fires only
for variant C. Variant C emits both <slug>-C-proposed.html
(the static reference) and <slug>-C-cinematic.html (the
register-applied surface). Variants A and B render static, never
acquiring the motion runtime.
Prototype owns:
$impeccable craft delegation, per variant.DESIGN-<id>.json
declares an extensions.motion.register.../prototype/reference/motion-validation.md.Multi-variant rendering is driven by the presence of multiple
DESIGN-<id>.json files at the project root, not by a CLI selector
— prototype has no --variant <id> input. That is exactly why the
parallel path in step 2 requires isolated workspace copies with a
single pinned DESIGN-<id>.json each: file presence is the only
variant selector prototype has. The A-first ordering above is what
keeps canon consistent across the B and C runs in either path.
uplift)After all three prototypes mark prototyped in state.json:
Confirm all three are open in the browser — each variant was
opened as it completed (Phase 5 step 3); open any that weren't,
using the open shell command (not playwright-cli open) so VFS
paths are served via the preview service worker:
open stardust/prototypes/<slug>-A-proposed.html
open stardust/prototypes/<slug>-B-proposed.html
open stardust/prototypes/<slug>-C-cinematic.html
playwright-cli open bypasses the preview service worker and produces
a FILE NOT FOUND error for VFS paths. Always use open <vfs-path> for
local prototype files.
Print the three-pitch summary in the chat:
uplift complete — three variants for <URL>
A · Tomorrow's version of the site you have today.
Improvements applied: <count>.
File: stardust/prototypes/<slug>-A-proposed.html
Pitch: "yes, that's us, fixed."
B · What if we amplified <captured trait>?
Trait: <name>.
Composition bet: <one-line summary>.
File: stardust/prototypes/<slug>-B-proposed.html
Pitch: "the brand's underused capability, foregrounded."
C · What if motion was part of the identity?
Cinematic register: <register>.
Motion bet: <one-line summary>.
File: stardust/prototypes/<slug>-C-cinematic.html
Pitch: "the brand's third dimension."
Differentiation: A vs B ≥ 2 changes (✓), A vs C ≥ 2 changes (✓),
B vs C ≥ 2 changes (✓).
Validation: all three pass critique + audit + adapt; C additionally
passes motion validation Pass 6.
Next: iterate any variant via chat ("make B's hero quieter") or
approve via the standard prototype approval flow (records the
approval in state.json).
The summary is the user's only direct touchpoint with the three variants. Keep it short — the work is on disk and openable.
| Variant | Pitch | Composition | Motion | Stakeholder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | "Tomorrow's version." | Same IA + improvements applied | Static | Risk-averse green-light buyer |
| B | "What if we amplified <captured trait>?" | One captured-but-underused trait foregrounded in IA / composition / voice | Static | Design team that wants brand exploration |
| C | "What if motion was part of the identity?" | Same IA as A | Fully cinematic, register from brand surface | Visionary buyer + design lead |
This contract is non-negotiable. The "C is cinematic" rule is
how uplift reliably ships a third proposition that's defensibly
different from A and B (rather than the C-cliff failure mode of
"everything from B but bigger").
If the captured brand surface can't support three differentiated
variants (e.g. the palette has only one color, the captured page
has only two sections, the brand register doesn't map cleanly to
any motion register), reduce to two variants (A + C) via
--two-variants rather than ship three weak ones.
Inherited from the underlying skills — uplift does not re-state
them but relies on them being enforced:
direct/SKILL.md § Mode A.direct/SKILL.md § IA-priority preservation audit.sectionPadding.desktop at ≤ 64px. Enforced by
direct/SKILL.md § Hard floor enforcement.direct/SKILL.md § Variant
differentiation contract.prototype/reference/proposed-file-shell.md § Content sourcing
hierarchy.[data-placeholder] not invented. Enforced
by prototype/SKILL.md Phase 2 § Content sourcing scan.stardust/current/assets/favicon.<ext> exists, each variant page
inlines it as a data: URI <link rel="icon">. Enforced by
prototype/reference/proposed-file-shell.md § Hard
requirements #8.prototype/reference/motion-validation.md § Pass 6f motion
C-cliff detector.prefers-reduced-motion: reduce.
Enforced by prototype/reference/motion-validation.md § Pass 6b.When any of these gates refuses, uplift surfaces the refusal
verbatim from the underlying skill — the user sees the specific
violation, not a generic "uplift failed" message.
Stop and ask only if:
(a) Extract fails — site unreachable, structure unparseable,
bot-management blocks past the headed-Chrome fallback.
(b) Brand surface insufficient — palette has fewer than 2
distinct colors after clustering; OR the captured page has
fewer than 3 sections; OR the captured PRODUCT.md Brand
Personality maps to none of the five motion registers.
Surface honestly: "the captured brand surface is too thin
for three differentiated variants — render one strong variant
instead?"
(c) Improvements list empty — Phase 2a cannot name 3 specific
weaknesses. Without specifics, variant A has no brief and
"uplift" has no claim. Surface honestly.
(d) Two candidates equally weak — if B's "what if…" candidate
and C's cinematic candidate would amplify the same captured
trait, the variants would not differentiate. Switch to
--two-variants (A + C only).
(e) Hard rule conflict — captured palette has a single color,
captured typography has no display register, captured site
has no system components. Brand-faithful constraint
impossible without invention. Surface and ask.
The skill does not stop for confirmation in normal flow. The "PROCEED. Run all phases without stopping" property of the original presales prompt is preserved.
stardust/
├── state.json ← extracted + 3× prototyped
├── direction.md ← resolved direction + 3 variant declarations
├── uplift-improvements.md ← load-bearing weakness list (≥ 3 items)
├── uplift-questions.md ← 6–8 "what if…" candidate list with disqualifications
├── current/ ← from extract
│ ├── PRODUCT.md
│ ├── DESIGN.md
│ ├── DESIGN.json
│ ├── brand-review.html
│ ├── _brand-extraction.json
│ ├── _crawl-log.json
│ ├── pages/<slug>.json
│ └── assets/
└── prototypes/
├── <slug>-A-shape.md
├── <slug>-A-proposed.html ← faithful + improvements
├── <slug>-B-shape.md
├── <slug>-B-proposed.html ← "what if amplifying <trait>"
├── <slug>-C-shape.md
├── <slug>-C-proposed.html ← static fallback for C
├── <slug>-C-cinematic.html ← cinematic variant C
├── lenis.min.js ← copied from skill assets
└── lenis.min.css
PRODUCT.md ← shared (Mode A)
DESIGN.md / DESIGN.json ← shared
DESIGN-A.md / DESIGN-A.json
DESIGN-B.md / DESIGN-B.json
DESIGN-C.md / DESIGN-C.json ← carries motion.register
extract → direct → prototype chain.prototype approval flow.
Migration is stardust:migrate.reference/what-if-candidates.md — the eight worked
captured-trait amplification candidates that B and C pick from,
plus the § Extension rule for evidence-shaped derived candidates.skills/stardust/reference/reference-research.md — procedure for
sourcing real-world design references (Phase 2.5): when to fire,
the 3–5 reference budget, the evidence shape, provenance
recording.../prototype/reference/motion-registers.md — register catalog
and selection heuristic used in Phase 3a.../prototype/reference/motion-validation.md § Pass 6 —
cinematic-mode validation gates that fire for variant C.../prototype/SKILL.md — multi-variant rendering and motion
driven by the per-variant DESIGN-<id>.json files direct wrote
in Phase 4, not by a CLI selector or flag (uplift never passes
--cinematic).../direct/SKILL.md § Phase 2.6 — multi-variant fork; uplift
passes the three-variant declaration through.../stardust/reference/data-attributes.md — structural section
attributes applied by prototype to all three variants.../prototype/reference/proposed-file-shell.md — content
sourcing hierarchy and placeholder convention.tools
Use the run-workflow MCP to discover, compose, execute, publish, and save Adobe Firefly workflows. TRIGGER when: user asks what actions are available, what the MCP can do, how to process images/video/3D via workflow, wants to build/run/save/publish a workflow, OR pastes any workflow/batch/execution ID. BARE ID (UUID/workflowId/batchId) = INSPECT ONLY — call inspect_run, NEVER run_workflow_submit. ALWAYS call list_actions first for capability/discovery questions. DO NOT TRIGGER for direct Firefly API calls without MCP (use firefly-api-specs).
tools
Run predefined featured workflows via run-workflow MCP. TRIGGER when user names a featured workflow (retargeting, banners at scale, localization, packaging, banner advertising, etc.) or asks to run a known marketing/production workflow. Requires run-workflow MCP. ALWAYS call get_featured_workflow before compose_workflow. DO NOT TRIGGER for custom one-off workflows with no named template — use run-workflow skill.
tools
Migrate an Adobe Commerce App Builder project from the Integration Starter Kit or Checkout Starter Kit to the new App Management approach. Run from the root of the App Builder project to be migrated. Pass --auto to skip confirmation prompts (suitable for CI or batch use) — auto mode prints a summary of all Q&A questions answered with their defaults. Pass --doc-scan-only to scan README.md and env.dist for outdated content without modifying any files. Use when the user wants to migrate an App Builder project from the Integration Starter Kit or Checkout Starter Kit to the App Management approach, or mentions upgrading their Adobe Commerce extension architecture.
development
Add or modify webhook interceptors in an Adobe Commerce app. Use when the user wants to intercept Commerce operations to validate input, append data, or modify behavior — before or after execution. Requires a base app initialized with commerce-app-init.