activer007/multi-cloud-architecture
skills_categorized/cicd/multi-cloud-architecture/SKILL.md
Design multi-cloud architectures using a decision framework to select and integrate services across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Use when building multi-cloud systems, avoiding vendor lock-in, or leveraging best-of-breed services from multiple providers.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add activer007/ordinary-claude-skills multi-cloud-architectureInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Mar 30, 2026, 1:35 AM37.1s2 files scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- multi-cloud-architecture
- description:
- Design multi-cloud architectures using a decision framework to select and integrate services across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Use when building multi-cloud systems, avoiding vendor lock-in, or leveraging best-of-breed services from multiple providers.
Multi-Cloud Architecture
Decision framework and patterns for architecting applications across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Purpose
Design cloud-agnostic architectures and make informed decisions about service selection across cloud providers.
When to Use
- Design multi-cloud strategies
- Migrate between cloud providers
- Select cloud services for specific workloads
- Implement cloud-agnostic architectures
- Optimize costs across providers
Cloud Service Comparison
Compute Services
| AWS | Azure | GCP | Use Case | |-----|-------|-----|----------| | EC2 | Virtual Machines | Compute Engine | IaaS VMs | | ECS | Container Instances | Cloud Run | Containers | | EKS | AKS | GKE | Kubernetes | | Lambda | Functions | Cloud Functions | Serverless | | Fargate | Container Apps | Cloud Run | Managed containers |
Storage Services
| AWS | Azure | GCP | Use Case | |-----|-------|-----|----------| | S3 | Blob Storage | Cloud Storage | Object storage | | EBS | Managed Disks | Persistent Disk | Block storage | | EFS | Azure Files | Filestore | File storage | | Glacier | Archive Storage | Archive Storage | Cold storage |
Database Services
| AWS | Azure | GCP | Use Case | |-----|-------|-----|----------| | RDS | SQL Database | Cloud SQL | Managed SQL | | DynamoDB | Cosmos DB | Firestore | NoSQL | | Aurora | PostgreSQL/MySQL | Cloud Spanner | Distributed SQL | | ElastiCache | Cache for Redis | Memorystore | Caching |
Reference: See references/service-comparison.md for complete comparison
Multi-Cloud Patterns
Pattern 1: Single Provider with DR
- Primary workload in one cloud
- Disaster recovery in another
- Database replication across clouds
- Automated failover
Pattern 2: Best-of-Breed
- Use best service from each provider
- AI/ML on GCP
- Enterprise apps on Azure
- General compute on AWS
Pattern 3: Geographic Distribution
- Serve users from nearest cloud region
- Data sovereignty compliance
- Global load balancing
- Regional failover
Pattern 4: Cloud-Agnostic Abstraction
- Kubernetes for compute
- PostgreSQL for database
- S3-compatible storage (MinIO)
- Open source tools
Cloud-Agnostic Architecture
Use Cloud-Native Alternatives
- Compute: Kubernetes (EKS/AKS/GKE)
- Database: PostgreSQL/MySQL (RDS/SQL Database/Cloud SQL)
- Message Queue: Apache Kafka (MSK/Event Hubs/Confluent)
- Cache: Redis (ElastiCache/Azure Cache/Memorystore)
- Object Storage: S3-compatible API
- Monitoring: Prometheus/Grafana
- Service Mesh: Istio/Linkerd
Abstraction Layers
Application Layer
↓
Infrastructure Abstraction (Terraform)
↓
Cloud Provider APIs
↓
AWS / Azure / GCP
Cost Comparison
Compute Pricing Factors
- AWS: On-demand, Reserved, Spot, Savings Plans
- Azure: Pay-as-you-go, Reserved, Spot
- GCP: On-demand, Committed use, Preemptible
Cost Optimization Strategies
- Use reserved/committed capacity (30-70% savings)
- Leverage spot/preemptible instances
- Right-size resources
- Use serverless for variable workloads
- Optimize data transfer costs
- Implement lifecycle policies
- Use cost allocation tags
- Monitor with cloud cost tools
Reference: See references/multi-cloud-patterns.md
Migration Strategy
Phase 1: Assessment
- Inventory current infrastructure
- Identify dependencies
- Assess cloud compatibility
- Estimate costs
Phase 2: Pilot
- Select pilot workload
- Implement in target cloud
- Test thoroughly
- Document learnings
Phase 3: Migration
- Migrate workloads incrementally
- Maintain dual-run period
- Monitor performance
- Validate functionality
Phase 4: Optimization
- Right-size resources
- Implement cloud-native services
- Optimize costs
- Enhance security
Best Practices
- Use infrastructure as code (Terraform/OpenTofu)
- Implement CI/CD pipelines for deployments
- Design for failure across clouds
- Use managed services when possible
- Implement comprehensive monitoring
- Automate cost optimization
- Follow security best practices
- Document cloud-specific configurations
- Test disaster recovery procedures
- Train teams on multiple clouds
Reference Files
references/service-comparison.md- Complete service comparisonreferences/multi-cloud-patterns.md- Architecture patterns
Related Skills
terraform-module-library- For IaC implementationcost-optimization- For cost managementhybrid-cloud-networking- For connectivity
Related Skills
activer007/ts-agent-sdk
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generate typed TypeScript SDKs for AI agents to interact with MCP servers. Converts verbose JSON-RPC curl commands to clean function calls (docs.createDocument() vs curl). Auto-detects MCP tools from server modules, generates TypeScript types and client methods, creates runnable example scripts. Use when: building MCP-enabled applications, need typed programmatic access to MCP tools, want Claude Code to manage apps via scripts, eliminating manual JSON-RPC curl commands, validating MCP inputs/outputs, or creating reusable agent automation.
10SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 16, 2026
activer007/task-generator
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generate structured task lists from specs or requirements. IMPORTANT: After completing ANY spec via ExitSpecMode, ALWAYS ask the user: "Would you like me to generate a task list for this spec?" Use when user confirms or explicitly requests task generation from a plan/spec/PRD.
10SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 16, 2026
activer007/story-explanation
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Create compelling story-format summaries using UltraThink to find the best narrative framing. Support multiple formats - 3-part narrative, n-length with inline links, abridged 5-line, or comprehensive via Foundry MCP. USE WHEN user says 'create story explanation', 'narrative summary', 'explain as a story', or wants content in Daniel's conversational first-person voice.
10SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 16, 2026
activer007/Siberian Shamanic Navigation
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Navigate through the original three-world shamanic technology. Deploy when soul retrieval, power animal guidance, or journey between realms emerges. Deeply respectful of Tungus, Buryat, Yakut, Evenki traditions. Use for consciousness navigation, NOT cultural appropriation.
10SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 16, 2026