skills/m13-domain-error/SKILL.md
Use when designing domain error handling. Keywords: domain error, error categorization, recovery strategy, retry, fallback, domain error hierarchy, user-facing vs internal errors, error code design, circuit breaker, graceful degradation, resilience, error context, backoff, retry with backoff, error recovery, transient vs permanent error, 领域错误, 错误分类, 恢复策略, 重试, 熔断器, 优雅降级
npx skillsauth add actionbook/rust-skills m13-domain-errorInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Layer 2: Design Choices
Who needs to handle this error, and how should they recover?
Before designing error types:
| Error Type | Audience | Recovery | Example |
|------------|----------|----------|---------|
| User-facing | End users | Guide action | InvalidEmail, NotFound |
| Internal | Developers | Debug info | DatabaseError, ParseError |
| System | Ops/SRE | Monitor/alert | ConnectionTimeout, RateLimited |
| Transient | Automation | Retry | NetworkError, ServiceUnavailable |
| Permanent | Human | Investigate | ConfigInvalid, DataCorrupted |
Before designing error types:
Who sees this error?
Can we recover?
What context is needed?
To domain constraints (Layer 3):
"How should I handle payment failures?"
↑ Ask: What are the business rules for retries?
↑ Check: domain-fintech (transaction requirements)
↑ Check: SLA (availability requirements)
| Question | Trace To | Ask | |----------|----------|-----| | Retry policy | domain-* | What's acceptable latency for retry? | | User experience | domain-* | What message should users see? | | Compliance | domain-* | What must be logged for audit? |
To implementation (Layer 1):
"Need typed errors"
↓ m06-error-handling: thiserror for library
↓ m04-zero-cost: Error enum design
"Need error context"
↓ m06-error-handling: anyhow::Context
↓ Logging: tracing with fields
"Need retry logic"
↓ m07-concurrency: async retry patterns
↓ Crates: tokio-retry, backoff
| Recovery Pattern | When | Implementation |
|------------------|------|----------------|
| Retry | Transient failures | exponential backoff |
| Fallback | Degraded mode | cached/default value |
| Circuit Breaker | Cascading failures | failsafe-rs |
| Timeout | Slow operations | tokio::time::timeout |
| Bulkhead | Isolation | separate thread pools |
#[derive(thiserror::Error, Debug)]
pub enum AppError {
// User-facing
#[error("Invalid input: {0}")]
Validation(String),
// Transient (retryable)
#[error("Service temporarily unavailable")]
ServiceUnavailable(#[source] reqwest::Error),
// Internal (log details, show generic)
#[error("Internal error")]
Internal(#[source] anyhow::Error),
}
impl AppError {
pub fn is_retryable(&self) -> bool {
matches!(self, Self::ServiceUnavailable(_))
}
}
use tokio_retry::{Retry, strategy::ExponentialBackoff};
async fn with_retry<F, T, E>(f: F) -> Result<T, E>
where
F: Fn() -> impl Future<Output = Result<T, E>>,
E: std::fmt::Debug,
{
let strategy = ExponentialBackoff::from_millis(100)
.max_delay(Duration::from_secs(10))
.take(5);
Retry::spawn(strategy, || f()).await
}
| Mistake | Why Wrong | Better | |---------|-----------|--------| | Same error for all | No actionability | Categorize by audience | | Retry everything | Wasted resources | Only transient errors | | Infinite retry | DoS self | Max attempts + backoff | | Expose internal errors | Security risk | User-friendly messages | | No context | Hard to debug | .context() everywhere |
| Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better | |--------------|---------|--------| | String errors | No structure | thiserror types | | panic! for recoverable | Bad UX | Result with context | | Ignore errors | Silent failures | Log or propagate | | Box<dyn Error> everywhere | Lost type info | thiserror | | Error in happy path | Performance | Early validation |
| When | See | |------|-----| | Error handling basics | m06-error-handling | | Retry implementation | m07-concurrency | | Domain modeling | m09-domain | | User-facing APIs | domain-* |
development
CRITICAL: Use for ALL Rust questions including errors, design, and coding. HIGHEST PRIORITY for: 比较, 对比, compare, vs, versus, 区别, difference, 最佳实践, best practice, tokio vs, async-std vs, 比较 tokio, 比较 async, Triggers on: Rust, cargo, rustc, crate, Cargo.toml, 意图分析, 问题分析, 语义分析, analyze intent, question analysis, compile error, borrow error, lifetime error, ownership error, type error, trait error, value moved, cannot borrow, does not live long enough, mismatched types, not satisfied, E0382, E0597, E0277, E0308, E0499, E0502, E0596, async, await, Send, Sync, tokio, concurrency, error handling, 编译错误, compile error, 所有权, ownership, 借用, borrow, 生命周期, lifetime, 类型错误, type error, 异步, async, 并发, concurrency, 错误处理, error handling, 问题, problem, question, 怎么用, how to use, 如何, how to, 为什么, why, 什么是, what is, 帮我写, help me write, 实现, implement, 解释, explain
development
Internal maintenance support for checking and fixing generated Rust skill documentation references. Use only when explicitly invoked by /fix-skill-docs.
development
Internal command support for dynamic Rust crate skill management. Use only when explicitly invoked by /sync-crate-skills, /clean-crate-skills, or /update-crate-skill.
tools
Internal support skill for agent-browser CLI workflows used by rust-learner, docs-researcher, and crate-researcher. Use only when browser automation is explicitly required.