abhichandra21/writing-assistant
skills/writing-assistant/SKILL.md
Rephrase, correct, and expand writing with context-aware improvements. Use when the user needs help with (1) Rephrasing text for clarity, tone, or style improvements, (2) Correcting grammatical errors, typos, or spelling mistakes, (3) Expanding rough ideas, bullet points, or fragments into full prose. Trigger phrases include "rephrase this", "fix this text", "help me write", "expand this idea", or simply providing text that needs improvement.
documentation
Updated Mar 29, 2026
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add abhichandra21/dotclaude writing-assistantInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 1, 2026, 12:04 AM54.0s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- writing-assistant
- description:
- >
Writing Assistant
Improve text through rephrasing, correction, or expansion based on user intent and context.
Modes
Determine which mode applies based on input analysis:
| Input Characteristics | Mode | Action | |----------------------|------|--------| | Mostly correct but could be clearer/better | Rephrase | Improve clarity, tone, style | | Obvious errors (grammar, typos, spelling) | Correction | Fix errors, minimal changes | | Fragments, bullets, rough ideas | Idea Expansion | Develop into full prose |
Workflow
1. Analyze Input
Identify the mode that best matches the input. If ambiguous, ask the user which approach they prefer.
2. Gather Context
Ask these questions before making changes:
For all modes:
- Audience: casual, professional, technical, executive?
- Tone: formal, friendly, assertive, neutral?
- Length: concise or expanded?
- Context: email, doc, slack, presentation?
Additional for Idea Expansion:
- Main point to convey?
- Specific details to include?
- Desired reader action?
3. Present Result
Show revised text, then note what changed (2-3 bullets max). Ask if adjustments are needed.
Examples
Rephrase/Correction:
Input: "i think we shoud move the meeting to tuesday becuase john cant make it monday"
Questions:
- Casual team chat or formal email?
- Keep brief or add context?
Output (casual, brief): "Let's move the meeting to Tuesday - John isn't available Monday."
Changes:
- Fixed spelling (should, because)
- Made more direct
- Kept casual tone
Idea Expansion:
Input: "idea: need to tell team about new deployment process, its complicated, people keep messing it up"
Questions:
- What's the new process briefly?
- What are people getting wrong?
- Announcement, guide, or feedback request?
Output: [Full prose based on responses]
Constraints
- Never change meaning or intent
- Preserve technical terms and proper nouns exactly
- Ask rather than assume when intent is unclear
- Keep corrections minimal - avoid over-editing
Related Skills
abhichandra21/review-board
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Multi-LLM review board. Sends any document (architecture docs, design docs, RFCs, API specs, runbooks) to external LLM CLIs (Codex, Gemini, GitHub Copilot) for independent review, synthesizes feedback, then optionally drives rebuttal rounds and consensus building. Multi-round, each round is opt-in. Trigger phrases include "review this doc", "get external review", "send to chatgpt and gemini", "review board", or any request to have a document reviewed by other LLMs.
SKILL.mdUpdated Mar 29, 2026
abhichandra21/review-board-copilot
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Multi-model review board powered by GitHub Copilot CLI. Sends any document to multiple AI models (GPT, Claude, Gemini) via a single Copilot CLI for independent review, synthesizes feedback, then optionally drives rebuttal rounds and consensus building. Uses Copilot subscription tokens instead of separate API keys. Trigger phrases include "copilot review", "review board copilot", "multi-model review", "debate this", "copilot debate", or any request for Copilot-powered document review or focused design debate.
SKILL.mdUpdated Mar 29, 2026
abhichandra21/promptheus
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
AI-powered prompt refinement and improvement using the Promptheus MCP server. Use this skill whenever the user asks to refine, improve, rewrite, or optimize a prompt. Trigger phrases include "refine this prompt", "improve this prompt", "make this prompt better", "optimize this prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or any request that involves taking an existing prompt/instruction and making it more effective. Also triggers when the user provides rough ideas, requirements, or specifications and asks for a well-crafted prompt to be generated from them.
SKILL.mdUpdated Mar 29, 2026
abhichandra21/code-review-copilot
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Multi-model code review board powered by GitHub Copilot CLI. Reviews PRs, branches, commits, or uncommitted changes by sending review targets to multiple AI models (GPT, Claude, Gemini) via Copilot CLI. Models fetch diffs and browse the codebase independently, then Claude synthesizes findings through optional rebuttal and consensus rounds. Uses Copilot subscription tokens instead of separate API keys. Trigger phrases include "code review copilot", "copilot code review", "review this PR", "review my changes", "review this branch", "copilot debate code", or any request for Copilot-powered code review or code-focused design debate.
SKILL.mdUpdated Mar 29, 2026