skills/capability-retro/SKILL.md
--- name: capability-retro description: At session end (handoff / close-session) or on demand, scan THIS session for capability gaps — a manual multi-step dance that should become a skill, heavy context-filling work that should be an agent, or a repeatable workflow the user described ("if I ever X, do Y") — plus existing skills/agents that need editing. Triage each (create-skill / create-agent / edit-existing / already-exists / not-worth-it), dedup against the live registry, then with approval c
npx skillsauth add RonanCodes/ronan-skills skills/capability-retroInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Close the self-improvement loop: each session that hand-rolled something painful is a signal a tool should exist. This skill spots those signals and turns the good ones into new skills/agents (or edits to existing ones) before context clears.
The split with /ro:skill-retro: skill-retro sharpens skills you used this
session. capability-retro spots capabilities you lacked (create-new) and is the step
that feeds the handoff template's "Skills / subagents this session wished it had".
/ro:handoff (before writing the file) and a check inside
/ro:close-session — so the loop closes every time you wrap a session.Only the live thread can see these — a fresh subagent can't. Skim the conversation + this session's git diffs for:
/ro:skill-retro).ls ~/Dev/ronan-skills/skills ~/Dev/ronan-private-skills/skills 2>/dev/null # skills
# agents: project .claude/agents + ~/.claude/agents + the agent registry
grep -ril "<keyword>" ~/Dev/ronan-skills/skills 2>/dev/null | head
For each candidate, find the closest existing skill/agent. If one already covers it, the outcome is already-exists (point at it) or edit-existing, not create-new.
/. The work needs
the live context, or it's a reusable workflow/checklist. Most candidates.Classify each candidate: create-skill / create-agent / edit-existing /
already-exists / not-worth-it (one-tool-use things aren't worth a skill). Then
AskUserQuestion with the create/edit candidates — let the user pick which to act on
now. Show the proposed name + one-line description + why for each.
/ro:create-skill (or dispatch a general-purpose Agent to author the
SKILL.md against the create-skill template). Keep authoring in the agent so the main
context stays lean..claude/agents/<name>.md or
~/.claude/agents/), following existing agent conventions./ro:skill-retro --skill <name> --apply or a direct Edit.Anything approved-but-deferred or not-worth-it-now → the handoff's "Skills / subagents
this session wished it had" section, or a ready-for-agent issue on ronan-skills. So
the gap survives even if it wasn't built this session.
CAPABILITY RETRO
signals found: <N>
→ create skill: <name> — <why>
→ create agent: <name> — <why>
→ edit existing: <skill> — <what>
→ already covered: <candidate> → use <existing>
→ not worth it: <candidate> (one-off)
acted on: <N> | deferred → <issue/handoff>
--apply — also create/edit the approved candidates (otherwise just propose).--no-agents — only consider skills, skip agent candidates.[[skill-retro]] — sharpen skills you USED (this is the create-new counterpart).[[create-skill]] — the authoring step for new skills.[[handoff]] / [[close-session]] — the session-end skills that invoke this.testing
--- name: linear-pipeline description: The Fable orchestrator for a single dispatched Linear ticket. Holds almost no context itself; it receives `--issue <ID> --detached`, decides the stage sequence, and fans out a sub-agent per stage, passing forward only each stage's artifact (never re-derived, never inlined into its own context). Step zero, before any planning or stage routing, is a boundary triage against `canon/security-boundary.md` (#199): a match tags Ronan Connolly and stops the run, no
development
--- name: in-your-face description: Capture a chat-only answer into a durable artifact (markdown + HTML, PDF when cheap) and launch it automatically so the user cannot miss it. Use when user says "in your face", "don't let me lose this", "save that answer", "make that durable", or right after answering a substantive side question (a recipe, comparison, how-to, or generated prompt) that would otherwise die with the context. category: workflow argument-hint: [--no-open] [--vault <short>] [hint of
tools
One-shot headless OpenAI Codex CLI calls for background/admin AI tasks — summaries, classification, extraction, admin glue. The default engine for anything that runs AI constantly in the background (daemon-driven, per-event), because it bills the flat ChatGPT subscription instead of Claude usage or per-token API spend, and it keeps working while Claude is rate-limited. NEVER for coding — coding stays Claude. Use when a skill or daemon needs a cheap always-on AI call, when the user says "use codex", "ask codex", "codex as backup", or when building a background summarizer/classifier into a listener or loop. Reads auth from ~/.codex/auth.json (ChatGPT account, no API key).
research
Turn a warranty rejection, repair quote, or RMA email into a cited decision brief — legal read (NL/EU consumer law), is the part user-serviceable, live part and new-unit prices, repair-vs-DIY-vs-new economics, before-you-send-it checklist, deadlines. Use when the user pastes or screenshots a repair quote, warranty rejection, "not covered" email, onderzoekskosten fee, or asks "should I repair or replace this".