Regtransfers/code-review-checklist

@ Code Review Checklist

@ Overview

Provide a systematic checklist for conducting thorough code reviews. This skill helps reviewers ensure code quality, catch bugs, identify security issues, and maintain consistency across the codebase.

@ When to Use This Skill

• Use when reviewing pull requests
• Use when conducting code audits
• Use when establishing code review standards for a team
• Use when training new developers on code review practices
• Use when you want to ensure nothing is missed in reviews
• Use when creating code review documentation

@ How It Works

@ Step 1: Understand the Context

Before reviewing code, I'll help you understand:

• What problem does this code solve?
• What are the requirements?
• What files were changed and why?
• Are there related issues or tickets?
• What's the testing strategy?

@ Step 2: Review Functionality

Check if the code works correctly:

• Does it solve the stated problem?
• Are edge cases handled?
• Is error handling appropriate?
• Are there any logical errors?
• Does it match the requirements?

@ Step 3: Review Code Quality

Assess code maintainability:

• Is the code readable and clear?
• Are names descriptive?
• Is it properly structured?
• Are functions/methods focused?
• Is there unnecessary complexity?

@ Step 4: Review Security

Check for security issues:

• Are inputs validated?
• Is sensitive data protected?
• Are there SQL injection risks?
• Is authentication/authorization correct?
• Are dependencies secure?

@ Step 5: Review Performance

Look for performance issues:

• Are there unnecessary loops?
• Is database access optimized?
• Are there memory leaks?
• Is caching used appropriately?
• Are there N+1 query problems?

@ Step 6: Review Tests

Verify test coverage:

• Are there tests for new code?
• Do tests cover edge cases?
• Are tests meaningful?
• Do all tests pass?
• Is test coverage adequate?

@ Examples

@ Example 1: Functionality Review Checklist

## Functionality Review

### Requirements
- [ ] Code solves the stated problem
- [ ] All acceptance criteria are met
- [ ] Edge cases are handled
- [ ] Error cases are handled
- [ ] User input is validated

### Logic
- [ ] No logical errors or bugs
- [ ] Conditions are correct (no off-by-one errors)
- [ ] Loops terminate correctly
- [ ] Recursion has proper base cases
- [ ] State management is correct

### Error Handling
- [ ] Errors are caught appropriately
- [ ] Error messages are clear and helpful
- [ ] Errors don't expose sensitive information
- [ ] Failed operations are rolled back
- [ ] Logging is appropriate

### Example Issues to Catch:

**❌ Bad - Missing validation:**
\`\`\`javascript
function createUser(email, password) {
  // No validation!
  return db.users.create({ email, password });
}
\`\`\`

**✅ Good - Proper validation:**
\`\`\`javascript
function createUser(email, password) {
  if (!email || !isValidEmail(email)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid email address');
  }
  if (!password || password.length < 8) {
    throw new Error('Password must be at least 8 characters');
  }
  return db.users.create({ email, password });
}
\`\`\`

@ Example 2: Security Review Checklist

## Security Review

### Input Validation
- [ ] All user inputs are validated
- [ ] SQL injection is prevented (use parameterized queries)
- [ ] XSS is prevented (escape output)
- [ ] CSRF protection is in place
- [ ] File uploads are validated (type, size, content)

### Authentication & Authorization
- [ ] Authentication is required where needed
- [ ] Authorization checks are present
- [ ] Passwords are hashed (never stored plain text)
- [ ] Sessions are managed securely
- [ ] Tokens expire appropriately

### Data Protection
- [ ] Sensitive data is encrypted
- [ ] API keys are not hardcoded
- [ ] Environment variables are used for secrets
- [ ] Personal data follows privacy regulations
- [ ] Database credentials are secure

### Dependencies
- [ ] No known vulnerable dependencies
- [ ] Dependencies are up to date
- [ ] Unnecessary dependencies are removed
- [ ] Dependency versions are pinned

### Example Issues to Catch:

**❌ Bad - SQL injection risk:**
\`\`\`javascript
const query = \`SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '\${email}'\`;
db.query(query);
\`\`\`

**✅ Good - Parameterized query:**
\`\`\`javascript
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = $1';
db.query(query, [email]);
\`\`\`

**❌ Bad - Hardcoded secret:**
\`\`\`javascript
const API_KEY = 'sk_live_abc123xyz';
\`\`\`

**✅ Good - Environment variable:**
\`\`\`javascript
const API_KEY = process.env.API_KEY;
if (!API_KEY) {
  throw new Error('API_KEY environment variable is required');
}
\`\`\`

@ Example 3: Code Quality Review Checklist

## Code Quality Review

### Readability
- [ ] Code is easy to understand
- [ ] Variable names are descriptive
- [ ] Function names explain what they do
- [ ] Complex logic has comments
- [ ] Magic numbers are replaced with constants

### Structure
- [ ] Functions are small and focused
- [ ] Code follows DRY principle (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- [ ] Proper separation of concerns
- [ ] Consistent code style
- [ ] No dead code or commented-out code

### Maintainability
- [ ] Code is modular and reusable
- [ ] Dependencies are minimal
- [ ] Changes are backwards compatible
- [ ] Breaking changes are documented
- [ ] Technical debt is noted

### Example Issues to Catch:

**❌ Bad - Unclear naming:**
\`\`\`javascript
function calc(a, b, c) {
  return a * b + c;
}
\`\`\`

**✅ Good - Descriptive naming:**
\`\`\`javascript
function calculateTotalPrice(quantity, unitPrice, tax) {
  return quantity * unitPrice + tax;
}
\`\`\`

**❌ Bad - Function doing too much:**
\`\`\`javascript
function processOrder(order) {
  // Validate order
  if (!order.items) throw new Error('No items');

  // Calculate total
  let total = 0;
  for (let item of order.items) {
    total += item.price * item.quantity;
  }

  // Apply discount
  if (order.coupon) {
    total *= 0.9;
  }

  // Process payment
  const payment = stripe.charge(total);

  // Send email
  sendEmail(order.email, 'Order confirmed');

  // Update inventory
  updateInventory(order.items);

  return { orderId: order.id, total };
}
\`\`\`

**✅ Good - Separated concerns:**
\`\`\`javascript
function processOrder(order) {
  validateOrder(order);
  const total = calculateOrderTotal(order);
  const payment = processPayment(total);
  sendOrderConfirmation(order.email);
  updateInventory(order.items);

  return { orderId: order.id, total };
}
\`\`\`

@ Best Practices

@ ✅ Do This

• Review Small Changes - Smaller PRs are easier to review thoroughly
• Check Tests First - Verify tests pass and cover new code
• Run the Code - Test it locally when possible
• Ask Questions - Don't assume, ask for clarification
• Be Constructive - Suggest improvements, don't just criticize
• Focus on Important Issues - Don't nitpick minor style issues
• Use Automated Tools - Linters, formatters, security scanners
• Review Documentation - Check if docs are updated
• Consider Performance - Think about scale and efficiency
• Check for Regressions - Ensure existing functionality still works

@ ❌ Don't Do This

• Don't Approve Without Reading - Actually review the code
• Don't Be Vague - Provide specific feedback with examples
• Don't Ignore Security - Security issues are critical
• Don't Skip Tests - Untested code will cause problems
• Don't Be Rude - Be respectful and professional
• Don't Rubber Stamp - Every review should add value
• Don't Review When Tired - You'll miss important issues
• Don't Forget Context - Understand the bigger picture

@ Complete Review Checklist

@ Pre-Review

• [ ] Read the PR description and linked issues
• [ ] Understand what problem is being solved
• [ ] Check if tests pass in CI/CD
• [ ] Pull the branch and run it locally

@ Functionality

• [ ] Code solves the stated problem
• [ ] Edge cases are handled
• [ ] Error handling is appropriate
• [ ] User input is validated
• [ ] No logical errors

@ Security

• [ ] No SQL injection vulnerabilities
• [ ] No XSS vulnerabilities
• [ ] Authentication/authorization is correct
• [ ] Sensitive data is protected
• [ ] No hardcoded secrets

@ Performance

• [ ] No unnecessary database queries
• [ ] No N+1 query problems
• [ ] Efficient algorithms used
• [ ] No memory leaks
• [ ] Caching used appropriately

@ Code Quality

• [ ] Code is readable and clear
• [ ] Names are descriptive
• [ ] Functions are focused and small
• [ ] No code duplication
• [ ] Follows project conventions

@ Tests

• [ ] New code has tests
• [ ] Tests cover edge cases
• [ ] Tests are meaningful
• [ ] All tests pass
• [ ] Test coverage is adequate

@ Documentation

• [ ] Code comments explain why, not what
• [ ] API documentation is updated
• [ ] README is updated if needed
• [ ] Breaking changes are documented
• [ ] Migration guide provided if needed

@ Git

• [ ] Commit messages are clear
• [ ] No merge conflicts
• [ ] Branch is up to date with main
• [ ] No unnecessary files committed
• [ ].gitignore is properly configured

@ Common Pitfalls

@ Problem: Missing Edge Cases Symptoms: Code works for happy path but fails on edge cases Solution: Ask "What if...?" questions

• What if the input is null?
• What if the array is empty?
• What if the user is not authenticated?
• What if the network request fails?

@ Problem: Security Vulnerabilities Symptoms: Code exposes security risks Solution: Use security checklist

• Run security scanners (npm audit, Snyk)
• Check OWASP Top 10
• Validate all inputs
• Use parameterized queries
• Never trust user input

@ Problem: Poor Test Coverage Symptoms: New code has no tests or inadequate tests Solution: Require tests for all new code

• Unit tests for functions
• Integration tests for features
• Edge case tests
• Error case tests

@ Problem: Unclear Code Symptoms: Reviewer can't understand what code does Solution: Request improvements

• Better variable names
• Explanatory comments
• Smaller functions
• Clear structure

@ Review Comment Templates

@ Requesting Changes

**Issue:** [Describe the problem]

**Current code:**
\`\`\`javascript
// Show problematic code
\`\`\`

**Suggested fix:**
\`\`\`javascript
// Show improved code
\`\`\`

**Why:** [Explain why this is better]

@ Asking Questions

**Question:** [Your question]

**Context:** [Why you're asking]

**Suggestion:** [If you have one]

@ Praising Good Code

**Nice!** [What you liked]

This is great because [explain why]

@ Related Skills

• @requesting-code-review - Prepare code for review
• @receiving-code-review - Handle review feedback
• @systematic-debugging - Debug issues found in review
• @test-driven-development - Ensure code has tests

@ Additional Resources

• Google Code Review Guidelines
• OWASP Top 10
• Code Review Best Practices
• How to Review Code

Pro Tip: Use a checklist template for every review to ensure consistency and thoroughness. Customize it for your team's specific needs!

@ Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• never treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.