skills/i-animate/SKILL.md
Use when the user says: "add animations", "motion design", "transitions". Add meaningful animations and transitions to interfaces.
npx skillsauth add NodeJSmith/Claudefiles i-animateInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Analyze a feature and strategically add animations and micro-interactions that enhance understanding, provide feedback, and create delight.
Read ~/.claude/skills/i-frontend-design/SKILL.md for design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /i-teach-impeccable first. Additionally gather: performance constraints.
Analyze where motion would improve the experience:
Identify static areas:
Understand the context:
If any of these are not answered by design context (design/context.md, .impeccable.md, or design/direction.md), STOP and call the AskUserQuestion tool to clarify. Use the answer to inform your animation strategy. If the answer is unclear or deferred, proceed with subtle, opacity-only transitions as the safe default.
CRITICAL: Respect prefers-reduced-motion. Always provide non-animated alternatives for users who need them.
Create a purposeful animation plan:
IMPORTANT: One well-orchestrated experience beats scattered animations everywhere. Focus on high-impact moments.
After analyzing the current state, present your proposed changes to the user:
Then STOP and confirm before implementing:
AskUserQuestion:
question: "Here's what I propose. How would you like to proceed?"
header: "Confirm"
options:
- label: "Implement"
description: "Looks good — go ahead and make these changes."
- label: "Refine scope"
description: "I want to adjust what's included before you start."
- label: "Challenge this first"
description: "I'll run /mine.challenge against your proposal before we proceed."
- label: "Stop here"
description: "Don't implement anything. The proposal is in this conversation only."
If "Implement" → proceed to implementation below. If "Refine scope" → ask what to change, update proposal, re-confirm.
<!-- CHALLENGE-CALLER -->If "Challenge this first" → invoke /mine.challenge inline against the proposal, read findings, revise proposal, re-present this gate.
If "Stop here" → end the skill.
Add motion systematically across these categories:
Use appropriate techniques for each animation:
Durations by purpose:
Easing curves (use these, not CSS defaults):
/* Recommended - natural deceleration */
--ease-out-quart: cubic-bezier(0.25, 1, 0.5, 1); /* Smooth, refined */
--ease-out-quint: cubic-bezier(0.22, 1, 0.36, 1); /* Slightly snappier */
--ease-out-expo: cubic-bezier(0.16, 1, 0.3, 1); /* Confident, decisive */
/* AVOID - feel dated and tacky */
/* bounce: cubic-bezier(0.34, 1.56, 0.64, 1); */
/* elastic: cubic-bezier(0.68, -0.6, 0.32, 1.6); */
Exit animations are faster than entrances. Use ~75% of enter duration.
/* Prefer for simple, declarative animations */
- transitions for state changes
- @keyframes for complex sequences
- transform + opacity only (GPU-accelerated)
/* Use for complex, interactive animations */
- Web Animations API for programmatic control
- Framer Motion for React
- GSAP for complex sequences
transform and opacity, avoid layout propertiescontain where appropriate@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
* {
animation-duration: 0.01ms !important;
animation-iteration-count: 1 !important;
transition-duration: 0.01ms !important;
}
}
NEVER:
prefers-reduced-motion—this is an accessibility violationAlso review the anti-patterns reference for general visual anti-patterns to avoid when styling animated elements.
Test animations thoroughly:
Remember: Motion should enhance understanding and provide feedback, not just add decoration. Animate with purpose, respect performance constraints, and always consider accessibility. Great animation is invisible - it just makes everything feel right.
After implementation, summarize in conversation:
development
Use when the user says: "document how X works", "write up how this works", "durable explanation", "explain this for the docs", "document this subsystem". Writes a durable, architectural-altitude explanation that survives code churn.
development
Use when picking up a fresh session after /clear, a stop, or an unanswered AskUserQuestion. Reconstructs the prior session's intent from its transcript tail and surfaces any unresolved decision; user-invoked only — for a hand-written end-of-day handoff use /mine-good-morning instead.
development
Use when the user says: "what did we discuss", "continue where we left off", "remember when", "as I mentioned", "you suggested", "we decided", "search my conversations", "find the conversation where", "what did we work on", or uses implicit signals like past-tense references, possessives without context, or assumptive questions. Direct search over past Claude Code sessions via cass.
tools
Use when the user says: "what context do I have", "relevant history for this task", "what have we done related to this". Also usable proactively when starting work that likely has prior history. Assembles a structured context brief from past session history via cass, scoped to the current task and workspace.