skills/i-adapt/SKILL.md
Use when the user says: "responsive design", "make it mobile-friendly", "adapt for mobile". Make interfaces work across screen sizes with responsive design.
npx skillsauth add NodeJSmith/Claudefiles i-adaptInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Adapt existing designs to work effectively across different contexts - different screen sizes, devices, platforms, or use cases.
Read ~/.claude/skills/i-frontend-design/SKILL.md for design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /i-teach-impeccable first. Additionally gather: target platforms/devices and usage contexts.
Understand what needs adaptation and why:
Identify the source context:
Understand target context:
Identify adaptation challenges:
CRITICAL: Adaptation is not just scaling - it's rethinking the experience for the new context.
Create context-appropriate strategy:
Layout Strategy:
Interaction Strategy:
Content Strategy:
Navigation Strategy:
Layout Strategy:
Interaction Strategy:
Layout Strategy:
Interaction Strategy:
Content Strategy:
Layout Strategy:
Content Strategy:
Layout Strategy:
Interaction Strategy:
After analyzing the current state, present your proposed changes to the user:
Then STOP and confirm before implementing:
AskUserQuestion:
question: "Here's what I propose. How would you like to proceed?"
header: "Confirm"
options:
- label: "Implement"
description: "Looks good — go ahead and make these changes."
- label: "Refine scope"
description: "I want to adjust what's included before you start."
- label: "Challenge this first"
description: "I'll run /mine.challenge against your proposal before we proceed."
- label: "Stop here"
description: "Don't implement anything. The proposal is in this conversation only."
If "Implement" → proceed to implementation below. If "Refine scope" → ask what to change, update proposal, re-confirm.
<!-- CHALLENGE-CALLER -->If "Challenge this first" → invoke /mine.challenge inline against the proposal, read findings, revise proposal, re-present this gate.
If "Stop here" → end the skill.
Apply changes systematically:
Choose appropriate breakpoints:
clamp(): Fluid sizing between min and maxdisplay: none sparingly (still downloads)srcset, picture element)IMPORTANT: Test on real devices, not just browser DevTools. Device emulation is helpful but not perfect.
NEVER:
Test thoroughly across contexts:
Remember: You're a cross-platform design expert. Make experiences that feel native to each context while maintaining brand and functionality consistency. Adapt intentionally, test thoroughly.
After implementation, summarize in conversation:
development
Use when the user says: 'create an issue', 'file an issue', 'open an issue', 'write an issue', 'new issue for this'. Codebase-aware issue creation — investigates the code to produce well-structured issues with acceptance criteria, affected areas, and enough detail for automated triage.
development
Use when the user says: 'triage issues', 'classify issues by complexity', 'assess issue complexity', 'find quick wins', 'which issues are small', 'batch issue assessment'. Batch codebase-aware issue triage — parallel Haiku subagents assess actual complexity and effort by reading the code, not just titles.
development
Use when the user says: "review my changes", "run the reviewers", "code and integration review", "readability review", "maintainability review", "sniff test this", "WTF check", "code smells", "is this code any good", "fresh eyes on this branch", "review this directory", "check this module". Dispatches three parallel reviewers — code, integration, and a readability pass — and consolidates findings into one prioritized report.
development
Use when the user says: "clean code check", "style review", "LLM smell check", "code hygiene", "nitpick this", "style check", "find style sins", "nitpicker review", "anal retentive review", "exhaustive style review", "no-filter style report". Dispatches three parallel stylistic checkers — llm-checker (training-bias patterns), lazy-checker (deferred debt), and nitpicker (style hygiene) — and consolidates findings into a report organized by checker with a Summary section for orchestration consumption.