skills/mcp-builder/SKILL.md
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
npx skillsauth add MoonBoi9001/claude-code-cli-tools mcp-builderInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Create MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. The quality of an MCP server is measured by how well it enables LLMs to accomplish real-world tasks.
Creating a high-quality MCP server involves four main phases:
API Coverage vs. Workflow Tools: Balance comprehensive API endpoint coverage with specialized workflow tools. Workflow tools can be more convenient for specific tasks, while comprehensive coverage gives agents flexibility to compose operations. Performance varies by client—some clients benefit from code execution that combines basic tools, while others work better with higher-level workflows. When uncertain, prioritize comprehensive API coverage.
Tool Naming and Discoverability:
Clear, descriptive tool names help agents find the right tools quickly. Use consistent prefixes (e.g., github_create_issue, github_list_repos) and action-oriented naming.
Context Management: Agents benefit from concise tool descriptions and the ability to filter/paginate results. Design tools that return focused, relevant data. Some clients support code execution which can help agents filter and process data efficiently.
Actionable Error Messages: Error messages should guide agents toward solutions with specific suggestions and next steps.
Navigate the MCP specification:
Start with the sitemap to find relevant pages: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/sitemap.xml
Then fetch specific pages with .md suffix for markdown format (e.g., https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft.md).
Key pages to review:
Recommended stack:
Load framework documentation:
For TypeScript (recommended):
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/main/README.mdFor Python:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/main/README.mdUnderstand the API: Review the service's API documentation to identify key endpoints, authentication requirements, and data models. Use web search and WebFetch as needed.
Tool Selection: Prioritize comprehensive API coverage. List endpoints to implement, starting with the most common operations.
See language-specific guides for project setup:
Create shared utilities:
For each tool:
Input Schema:
Output Schema:
outputSchema where possible for structured datastructuredContent in tool responses (TypeScript SDK feature)Tool Description:
Implementation:
Annotations:
readOnlyHint: true/falsedestructiveHint: true/falseidempotentHint: true/falseopenWorldHint: true/falseReview for:
TypeScript:
npm run build to verify compilationnpx @modelcontextprotocol/inspectorPython:
python -m py_compile your_server.pySee language-specific guides for detailed testing approaches and quality checklists.
After implementing your MCP server, create comprehensive evaluations to test its effectiveness.
Load ✅ Evaluation Guide for complete evaluation guidelines.
Use evaluations to test whether LLMs can effectively use your MCP server to answer realistic, complex questions.
To create effective evaluations, follow the process outlined in the evaluation guide:
Ensure each question is:
Create an XML file with this structure:
<evaluation>
<qa_pair>
<question>Find discussions about AI model launches with animal codenames. One model needed a specific safety designation that uses the format ASL-X. What number X was being determined for the model named after a spotted wild cat?</question>
<answer>3</answer>
</qa_pair>
<!-- More qa_pairs... -->
</evaluation>
Load these resources as needed during development:
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/sitemap.xml, then fetch specific pages with .md suffixhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/main/README.mdhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/main/README.md🐍 Python Implementation Guide - Complete Python/FastMCP guide with:
@mcp.tool⚡ TypeScript Implementation Guide - Complete TypeScript guide with:
server.registerTooltesting
Bring a branch up to date with its base by MERGING the base in (a merge commit), never rebasing — so no commit hashes are rewritten and no force-push is needed. Use this whenever the user asks to "use the merge skill", "bring my branch up to date", "merge main/the base into this branch", "update my branch from its base without rebasing", "do a merge commit instead of rebasing", or "clear the conflict on my stacked PR without a force-push" (a common situation right after a parent PR squash-merges and the child branch suddenly shows conflicts). It handles both cases: a base that only re-packaged work the branch already has, and a base that carries genuinely new work to fold in. It always verifies the merge preserved exactly the branch's own change before pushing. This is an explicitly-invoked workflow — reach for it when the user talks about merging or updating a branch from its base, but don't hijack unrelated git merges.
development
Run a deep multi-agent review of a GitHub PR — 6 specialized agents covering architecture, correctness, security, tests, code quality, and integration. ONLY trigger when the user's message contains the explicit phrase 'deep review' (e.g. 'deep review this PR', 'deep review PR #1234', 'do a deep review of 1234', '/deep-review'). Do NOT trigger on bare 'review', 'review this', 'review the PR', 'code review', 'what do you think of this PR', or pasted PR URLs without 'deep review' in the message — those are handled by the lighter /review skill. The literal phrase 'deep review' must appear in the user's message; absence of that phrase means do not invoke this skill.
data-ai
--- name: re-explain description: Re-explain a concept from the ground up when an earlier explanation didn't land. Trigger aggressively whenever the user signals confusion about recent technical content — phrases like "i don't get it", "from scratch", "ground up", "explain again", "this makes no sense", "try again", "you need to work better", "what's X" (where X was something just mentioned), or invoking /re-explain directly. Also trigger on quieter cues like the user re-quoting a phrase from th
development
Load a high-fidelity recap of a prior Claude Code session into the current session's context. The goal is to be LESS lossy than running /compact would be — the user is invoking this skill precisely because /compact discards detail they need. Use this when the user wants to "resume", "pick up", "continue", or "load context from" a previous session — especially a long one (hundreds of thousands of tokens) where actually resuming the session would be prohibitively expensive, or where the session was auto-compacted mid-flow and a lot of detailed work happened after the last compaction that another /compact pass would crush. Also trigger on phrases like "recap the last session", "what was I working on yesterday", "load the prior chat", or "/load-prior-session". The skill extracts via a subagent so the full transcript never enters the current session's context.