FrancoStino/vulnerability-scanner

Vulnerability Scanner

Think like an attacker, defend like an expert. 2025 threat landscape awareness.

🔧 Runtime Scripts

Execute for automated validation:

| Script | Purpose | Usage | |--------|---------|-------| | scripts/security_scan.py | Validate security principles applied | python scripts/security_scan.py <project_path> |

📋 Reference Files

| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | checklists.md | OWASP Top 10, Auth, API, Data protection checklists |

---

1. Security Expert Mindset

Core Principles

| Principle | Application | |-----------|-------------| | Assume Breach | Design as if attacker already inside | | Zero Trust | Never trust, always verify | | Defense in Depth | Multiple layers, no single point | | Least Privilege | Minimum required access only | | Fail Secure | On error, deny access |

Threat Modeling Questions

Before scanning, ask:

1. What are we protecting? (Assets)
2. Who would attack? (Threat actors)
3. How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
4. What's the impact? (Business risk)

---

2. OWASP Top 10:2025

Risk Categories

| Rank | Category | Think About | |------|----------|-------------| | A01 | Broken Access Control | Who can access what? IDOR, SSRF | | A02 | Security Misconfiguration | Defaults, headers, exposed services | | A03 | Software Supply Chain 🆕 | Dependencies, CI/CD, build integrity | | A04 | Cryptographic Failures | Weak crypto, exposed secrets | | A05 | Injection | User input → system commands | | A06 | Insecure Design | Flawed architecture | | A07 | Authentication Failures | Session, credential management | | A08 | Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, tampered data | | A09 | Logging & Alerting | Blind spots, no monitoring | | A10 | Exceptional Conditions 🆕 | Error handling, fail-open states |

2025 Key Changes

2021 → 2025 Shifts:
├── SSRF merged into A01 (Access Control)
├── A02 elevated (Cloud/Container configs)
├── A03 NEW: Supply Chain (major focus)
├── A10 NEW: Exceptional Conditions
└── Focus shift: Root causes > Symptoms

---

3. Supply Chain Security (A03)

Attack Surface

| Vector | Risk | Question to Ask | |--------|------|-----------------| | Dependencies | Malicious packages | Do we audit new deps? | | Lock files | Integrity attacks | Are they committed? | | Build pipeline | CI/CD compromise | Who can modify? | | Registry | Typosquatting | Verified sources? |

Defense Principles

• Verify package integrity (checksums)
• Pin versions, audit updates
• Use private registries for critical deps
• Sign and verify artifacts

---

4. Attack Surface Mapping

What to Map

| Category | Elements | |----------|----------| | Entry Points | APIs, forms, file uploads | | Data Flows | Input → Process → Output | | Trust Boundaries | Where auth/authz checked | | Assets | Secrets, PII, business data |

Prioritization Matrix

Risk = Likelihood × Impact

High Impact + High Likelihood → CRITICAL
High Impact + Low Likelihood  → HIGH
Low Impact + High Likelihood  → MEDIUM
Low Impact + Low Likelihood   → LOW

---

5. Risk Prioritization

CVSS + Context

| Factor | Weight | Question | |--------|--------|----------| | CVSS Score | Base severity | How severe is the vuln? | | EPSS Score | Exploit likelihood | Is it being exploited? | | Asset Value | Business context | What's at risk? | | Exposure | Attack surface | Internet-facing? |

Prioritization Decision Tree

Is it actively exploited (EPSS >0.5)?
├── YES → CRITICAL: Immediate action
└── NO → Check CVSS
         ├── CVSS ≥9.0 → HIGH
         ├── CVSS 7.0-8.9 → Consider asset value
         └── CVSS <7.0 → Schedule for later

---

6. Exceptional Conditions (A10 - New)

Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed

| Scenario | Fail-Open (BAD) | Fail-Closed (GOOD) | |----------|-----------------|---------------------| | Auth error | Allow access | Deny access | | Parsing fails | Accept input | Reject input | | Timeout | Retry forever | Limit + abort |

What to Check

• Exception handlers that catch-all and ignore
• Missing error handling on security operations
• Race conditions in auth/authz
• Resource exhaustion scenarios

---

7. Scanning Methodology

Phase-Based Approach

1. RECONNAISSANCE
   └── Understand the target
       ├── Technology stack
       ├── Entry points
       └── Data flows

2. DISCOVERY
   └── Identify potential issues
       ├── Configuration review
       ├── Dependency analysis
       └── Code pattern search

3. ANALYSIS
   └── Validate and prioritize
       ├── False positive elimination
       ├── Risk scoring
       └── Attack chain mapping

4. REPORTING
   └── Actionable findings
       ├── Clear reproduction steps
       ├── Business impact
       └── Remediation guidance

---

8. Code Pattern Analysis

High-Risk Patterns

| Pattern | Risk | Look For | |---------|------|----------| | String concat in queries | Injection | "SELECT * FROM " + user_input | | Dynamic code execution | RCE | eval(), exec(), Function() | <!-- security-allowlist: defensive vulnerability taxonomy --> | Unsafe deserialization | RCE | pickle.loads(), unserialize() | | Path manipulation | Traversal | User input in file paths | | Disabled security | Various | verify=False, --insecure |

Secret Patterns

| Type | Indicators | |------|-----------| | API Keys | api_key, apikey, high entropy | | Tokens | token, bearer, jwt | | Credentials | password, secret, key | | Cloud | AWS_, AZURE_, GCP_ prefixes |

---

9. Cloud Security Considerations

Shared Responsibility

| Layer | You Own | Provider Owns | |-------|---------|---------------| | Data | ✅ | ❌ | | Application | ✅ | ❌ | | OS/Runtime | Depends | Depends | | Infrastructure | ❌ | ✅ |

Cloud-Specific Checks

• IAM: Least privilege applied?
• Storage: Public buckets?
• Network: Security groups tightened?
• Secrets: Using secrets manager?

---

10. Anti-Patterns

| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do | |----------|-------| | Scan without understanding | Map attack surface first | | Alert on every CVE | Prioritize by exploitability + asset | | Ignore false positives | Maintain verified baseline | | Fix symptoms only | Address root causes | | Scan once before deploy | Continuous scanning | | Trust third-party deps blindly | Verify integrity, audit code |

---

11. Reporting Principles

Finding Structure

Each finding should answer:

1. What? - Clear vulnerability description
2. Where? - Exact location (file, line, endpoint)
3. Why? - Root cause explanation
4. Impact? - Business consequence
5. How to fix? - Specific remediation

Severity Classification

| Severity | Criteria | |----------|----------| | Critical | RCE, auth bypass, mass data exposure | | High | Data exposure, privilege escalation | | Medium | Limited scope, requires conditions | | Low | Informational, best practice |

---

Remember: Vulnerability scanning finds issues. Expert thinking prioritizes what matters. Always ask: "What would an attacker do with this?"

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.