bundled-skills/logic-explain/SKILL.md
Explain what a specific piece of code actually does for a given input by producing a step-by-step execution trace (interprocedural, with name resolution and type transitions). Trigger when the user is confused about behavior or asks why code produces X instead of Y — "walk me through...
npx skillsauth add FrancoStino/opencode-skills-antigravity logic-explainInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Use this skill when you need explain what a specific piece of code actually does for a given input by producing a step-by-step execution trace (interprocedural, with name resolution and type transitions). Trigger when the user is confused about behavior or asks why code produces X instead of Y — "walk me through...
Use lazy loading per ../_shared/common.md §13:
../_shared/common.md only for language, report header variants, scope routing, and loading budget.logic-explain-guide.md as you reach it.../_shared/semiformal-guide.md, ../_shared/semiformal-checklist.md, and ../_shared/report-template.md on demand when the current step needs them.Note: logic-risks.md is intentionally skipped — logic-explain does not produce L-code findings, and Remedy is intentionally out of scope for this mode. If the trace reveals a bug, stop and recommend logic-review or logic-locate. When handing off, do not discard work already done — present the premises established and trace steps completed under a "Partial trace context (carry into next skill):" heading so the user can pass them directly to the follow-on skill.
Step 0. Language + scope routing. Detect language per common.md §1. Confirm a single function + a single input scenario. If the user wants bug-finding without a scenario, hand off to logic-review.
Step 1. Entry point and scenario (guide Step 1) — name the function, the input scenario, and what the user is trying to understand.
Step 2. Build premises (guide Step 2) — resolve every non-obvious name, state the types of key variables at entry, note global/module state accessed.
Step 3. Produce step-by-step trace (guide Step 3) — numbered, interprocedural, active voice; cross function boundaries whenever relevant to the user's scenario. Keep the trace scenario-bound; do not branch into alternative paths unless they explain the user's confusion.
Step 4. Highlight non-obvious behavior (guide Step 4) — name resolutions, implicit coercions, hidden side effects; the "gotchas" the casual reader would miss.
Step 5. Summarize actual vs. assumed (guide Step 5) — one sentence each; this is the core value for the user.
Mode line in report: Execution Explain (Chinese: 执行解释).
Note: Execution Explain is descriptive, not evaluative. Omit the Logic Score / Fault Confidence / Verdict line from the report header.
tools
Authorized security assessment of LLM applications and AI agents: prompt injection, tool abuse, RAG exposure, memory poisoning, system-prompt extraction, and agent-compliance engineering per OWASP LLM/ASI Top 10.
development
Builds two parameterized UI modes—流光溢彩白 (iridescent white) and 五彩斑斓黑 (colorful black)—with OKLCH, WebGL/CSS fallback, vision gating, screenshot QA, and total/per-color intensity reports. Use when a UI request names either mode or needs measured color parameters.
tools
Delegate coding tasks to the Kimi Code CLI (`kimi`) only when the user explicitly requests it, while the orchestrator retains review and landing responsibility.
development
Front-end JavaScript reverse engineering: locate signature chains, analyze encrypted request parameters, sample runtime behavior, and reproduce logic locally in Node for evidence-based output.