AmbroseTriC/qa-quarto
.claude/skills/qa-quarto/SKILL.md
Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA. Critic finds issues, fixer applies fixes, loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds).
testing
Updated Apr 16, 2026
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add AmbroseTriC/ECON53_DAC qa-quartoInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 15, 2026, 10:08 AM5.7s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- qa-quarto
- description:
- Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA. Critic finds issues, fixer applies fixes, loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds).
- argument-hint:
- [LectureN]
- allowed-tools:
- ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Edit", "Bash", "Task"]
- context:
- fork
Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA Workflow
Compare Quarto HTML slides against their Beamer PDF benchmark using an iterative critic/fixer loop.
Philosophy: The Beamer PDF is the gold standard. The Quarto translation must be at least as good in every dimension.
Workflow
Phase 0: Pre-flight → Phase 1: Critic audit → Phase 2: Fixer → Phase 3: Re-audit → Loop until APPROVED (max 5 rounds)
Hard Gates (Non-Negotiable)
| Gate | Condition | |------|-----------| | Overflow | NO content cut off | | Plot Quality | Interactive charts >= static plots | | Content Parity | No missing slides/equations/text | | Visual Regression | Quarto >= Beamer in all dimensions | | Slide Centering | Content centered, no jumping | | Notation Fidelity | All math verbatim from Beamer |
Phase 0: Pre-flight
- Locate Beamer (.tex/.pdf) and Quarto (.qmd/.html) files
- Check freshness (re-render if QMD newer than HTML)
- Verify TikZ SVGs if applicable
Phase 1: Initial Audit
Launch the quarto-critic agent to compare Beamer vs Quarto comprehensively. Report saved to quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_critic_round1.md.
Phase 2: Fix Cycle
If not APPROVED, launch quarto-fixer agent to apply fixes (Critical → Major → Minor), re-render, and verify.
Phase 3: Re-Audit
Re-launch critic to verify fixes. Loop back to Phase 2 if needed.
Iteration Limits
Max 5 fix rounds. After that, escalate to user with remaining issues.
Final Report
Save to quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_final.md with hard gate status, iteration summary, and remaining issues.
Related Skills
AmbroseTriC/visual-audit
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Perform adversarial visual audit of Quarto or Beamer slides checking for overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, and layout issues.
SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 16, 2026
AmbroseTriC/validate-bib
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Validate bibliography entries against citations in all lecture files. Find missing entries and unused references.
SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 16, 2026
AmbroseTriC/translate-to-quarto
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Translate Beamer LaTeX to Quarto RevealJS. Multi-phase workflow with TikZ extraction and QA.
SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 16, 2026
AmbroseTriC/slide-excellence
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Multi-agent slide review (visual, pedagogy, proofreading). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.
SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 16, 2026