paper2skill/paper2skill-application-transfer/SKILL.md
Convert arXiv papers that apply ML techniques to real-world domains into application-transfer skills. Extracts problem formulation, domain adaptation gaps, and deployment recipes. Use this skill when extracting skills from Category 1 (Application Transfer) papers — papers about AlphaFold-style domain applications, robotics deployment, interdisciplinary ML crossings, or any paper where the novelty is in what was solved rather than the method itself.
npx skillsauth add ADu2021/skillXiv paper2skill-application-transferInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Apply this skill when you encounter arXiv papers that:
Examples: AlphaFold applying attention to protein structure, quadrupedal locomotion adapting RL to embodied agents, BLIP adapting vision-language models to multimodal tasks.
Do not use this skill for:
Extract what real-world or domain-specific problem the paper solves and why it matters.
**Domain Problem:** What specific problem is being solved? Why is it important?
**Domain Context:** What makes this problem different from standard benchmarks?
**Existing Approaches:** What was the baseline approach before this work?
Identify what existing methods lack and why naive application fails.
**The Gap:** What specific limitations did existing methods have for this domain?
**Why It Matters:** How does this gap translate to real-world failure modes?
**Domain Constraints:** What domain-specific constraints forced adaptation?
- Hardware/computational limits
- Data availability or annotation cost
- Real-time requirements
- Physical/safety constraints
Document the foundational technique being adapted.
**Source Technique:** What is the core ML method (architecture, loss, training procedure)?
**Original Context:** Where did this method originate and what was it designed for?
**Key Properties:** What properties make it suitable for adaptation to this domain?
Map the specific modifications made to fit the domain.
**Key Adaptations:**
1. [Specific change]: Why this change was necessary
2. [Specific change]: Why this change was necessary
3. [Specific change]: Why this change was necessary
**Why These Work:** How do these adaptations address the domain gap?
Synthesize a reusable template for similar transfers.
**Recipe for Domain Transfer:**
1. Identify source technique that has property X, Y, Z
2. Analyze your domain problem for constraint A, B, C
3. Map constraints to required modifications:
- For constraint A, modify [component]
- For constraint B, modify [component]
4. Validate with domain-specific metrics
5. Deploy with [deployment considerations]
Document practical insights for real-world use.
**Deployment Considerations:**
- Data pipeline: [how to prepare domain data]
- Integration points: [where the method fits in larger systems]
- Failure modes: [what goes wrong and how to detect it]
- Scaling considerations: [production deployment constraints]
- Monitoring: [metrics that indicate healthy operation]
Generate a new SKILL.md with:
Frontmatter:
---
name: [kebab-case-domain-method]
title: [Domain Transfer: Adapting {Method} to {Domain}]
version: 0.0.2
engine: skillxiv-v0.0.2-claude-opus-4.6
license: MIT
url: [verified arxiv link to source paper]
keywords: [domain, method, constraint1, constraint2, outcome]
description: Apply {Method} to {Domain} by bridging the gap between {original context} and {domain requirements}. Focuses on {key adaptation}, enabling {outcome} when solving {problem class}.
---
Content structure:
Length: 150-250 lines including code examples (if applicable)
testing
Uses flow maps as look-ahead operators to enable principled reward-guided diffusion by predicting trajectory endpoints at any denoising step. Deploy when applying rewards or preferences to diffusion trajectories with meaningful gradients throughout generation.
testing
Train language models where each expert learns independently on closed datasets, enabling flexible inference with selective data inclusion or exclusion. 41% performance improvement while allowing users to opt out of specific data sources without retraining.
data-ai
Understand how token generation flexibility in diffusion LMs paradoxically constrains reasoning, as models exploit ordering flexibility to avoid uncertain tokens, and apply simplified approaches that preserve parallel decoding benefits. Use when optimizing diffusion-based language models for reasoning tasks.
devops
Enable LLM agents to improve continuously during deployment by constructing structured experience libraries through self-reflection on successes and failures—achieving 23% improvement on reasoning without gradient-based parameter updates or external training.