
개발 커뮤니티에서 기술 주제에 대한 다양한 의견 수집. "개발자 반응", "커뮤니티 의견", "developer reactions" 요청에 사용. Reddit, HN, Dev.to, Lobsters 등 종합.
Invoke when Claude ignores instructions, behaves inconsistently, hooks malfunction, or MCP servers need auditing. Audits the full six-layer config stack and flags issues by severity. Not for debugging code or reviewing PRs.
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Internal helper contract for calling the codex-companion runtime from Claude Code
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
Invoke before writing any code for a new feature, design, or architecture decision. Turns rough ideas into approved plans with validated structure. Not for bug fixes or small edits.
Invoke when debugging any error, crash, unexpected behavior, or failing test. Finds root cause before applying any fix. Not for code review or new features.
Analyze today's work (git commits + session conversation) and upload categorized pages to a Notion DB. Each page is written in engineering blog style with why/trade-off/before-after structure. Use /cnotion analyze for session insight extraction mode.
Invoke when diving deep into an unfamiliar domain, preparing a research article, or turning collected sources into publishable output. Runs a six-phase workflow: collect, digest, outline, fill in, refine, publish. Not for quick lookups or single-file reads.
김영한 스타일 Spring/Java 백엔드 강사 모드로 전환. 인프런 강의처럼 점진적 역사 진화법으로 개념을 설명하고, 코드 블록으로만 코드를 보여주며, 학습자가 직접 타이핑하도록 유도한다. 파일 직접 수정 금지.
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
This skill should be used when the user asks to "기술 의사결정", "뭐 쓸지 고민", "A vs B", "비교 분석", "라이브러리 선택", "아키텍처 결정", "어떤 걸 써야 할지", "트레이드오프", "기술 선택", "구현 방식 고민", or needs deep analysis for technical decisions. Provides systematic multi-source research and synthesized recommendations.
This skill should be used when the user's request or requirement is ambiguous and needs iterative questioning to become actionable. Trigger on "clarify requirements", "refine requirements", "요구사항 명확히", "요구사항 정리", "뭘 원하는 건지", "make this clearer", "spec this out", "scope this", "/clarify". Turns vague inputs into concrete specs. For strategy blind spots use unknown; for content-vs-form reframing use metamedium.
This skill should be used when the user provides a strategy, plan, or decision document and wants to surface hidden assumptions and blind spots using the Known/Unknown 4-quadrant framework. Trigger on "known unknown", "4분면 분석", "blind spots", "뭘 놓치고 있지", "뭘 모르는지 모르겠어", "전략 점검", "전략 분석", "assumption check", "가정 점검", "quadrant analysis", "what am I missing". Strategy-level blind spot analysis with hypothesis-driven questioning. For requirement clarification use vague; for content-vs-form reframing use metamedium.
Invoke only when explicitly asked to write, edit, or polish prose in Chinese or English. Strips AI writing patterns and rewrites to sound natural. Not for code comments, commit messages, or inline docs.
Invoke after any implementation task completes or before merging. Reviews the diff, auto-fixes safe issues, runs specialist security and architecture reviewers on large diffs. Not for exploring ideas or debugging.
Analyze today's git commits and session conversation, then save categorized markdown files to ~/devlog/{repo-name}/{date}/. Based on cnotion templates but saves locally instead of Notion. All output in Korean.
Internal guidance for presenting Codex helper output back to the user
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
Internal guidance for composing Codex and GPT-5.4 prompts for coding, review, diagnosis, and research tasks inside the Codex Claude Code plugin
This skill should be used when user wants to access, capture, or reference Claude Code session history. Trigger when user says "capture session", "save session history", or references past/current conversation as a source - whether for saving, extracting, summarizing, or reviewing. This includes any mention of "what we discussed", "today's work", "session history", or when user treats the conversation itself as source material (e.g., "from our conversation").
툴 실행(Bash, Read, Edit, Write, Grep, Glob 등)이 포함된 모든 작업에서 각 툴 호출 아래에 지금 무엇을 하고 있는지 한국어로 한 줄 설명을 추가한다. 항상 활성화.
This skill should be used when the user is building, planning, or strategizing and the key question is whether to optimize content (what) or change form (how/medium). Trigger on "내용 vs 형식", "content vs form", "metamedium", "형식을 바꿔볼까", "새로운 포맷", "관점 전환", "perspective shift", "다른 방법 없을까", "같은 방식이 안 먹혀", "diminishing returns". Applies Alan Kay's metamedium concept to surface form-level alternatives. For requirement clarification use vague; for strategy blind spots use unknown.
Interactive markdown review with web UI. Use when user says "review this", "check this plan", "피드백", "검토해줘" or specifies a file path to review.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze session", "세션 분석", "evaluate skill execution", "스킬 실행 검증", "check session logs", "로그 분석", provides a session ID with a skill path, or wants to verify that a skill executed correctly in a past session. Post-hoc analysis of Claude Code sessions to validate skill/agent/hook behavior against SKILL.md specifications.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "wrap up session", "end session", "session wrap", "/wrap", "document learnings", "what should I commit", or wants to analyze completed work before ending a coding session.