
Cancel active execution mode (ralph, autopilot) and clean up state
Full autonomous execution from idea to working code — expand, plan, implement, QA, validate
Socratic deep interview with mathematical ambiguity scoring before planning and execution
Use when performing a comprehensive multi-agent code review of a pull request or branch diff
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Unified planning entry point — detects broad vs. specific requests and routes to appropriate planning workflow
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Review changed code for reuse, quality, and efficiency, then fix any issues found
Use when diagnosing bugs using multi-agent parallel investigation
Thorough codebase search using structured search strategy via scout agent
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Deep codebase initialization — create hierarchical AGENTS.md documentation across the entire project
Token-efficient model routing modifier — shifts tier preferences down to save costs
Fetch external documentation and references — decompose query into facets, search in parallel
Use when performing a security-focused review of code changes to identify exploitable vulnerabilities
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Consensus planning with adversarial review — planner, architect, and critic iterate until approved
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
PRD-driven persistence loop — keep working until all user stories pass with architect verification
Extract a hard-won debugging insight from the current conversation into a reusable skill file
Autonomous QA cycling - verify, diagnose, fix, repeat until goal met (max 5 cycles)
Parallel execution engine — fire multiple independent agents simultaneously with smart model tier routing
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback
Evidence-driven causal tracing — competing hypotheses, disconfirmation, discriminating probe
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Clean AI-generated code slop with a regression-safe, deletion-first workflow and optional reviewer-only mode